PROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN AMIODARONE Versus LIDOCAINE IN SVT

NCT ID: NCT03299517

Last Updated: 2018-10-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-08-02

Study Completion Date

2022-08-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Introduction: Recent studies have suggested that other medications may be superior to amiodarone in controlling ventricular arrhythmias. However, a prospective and randomized comparison with lidocaine has not yet been described.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the use of amiodarone versus lidocaine in patients with stable ventricular tachycardias.

Methodology: For this, a unicentric, randomized and prospective study will be carried out, in which the two drugs will be administered in a comparative manner. Hospital data (test results, medical outcomes, arrhythmia reversal, complications) of patients will be analyzed for safety and effectiveness.

Expected results: The use of lidocaine is not inferior to amiodarone in the tolerability and reversion of stable ventricular tachycardias.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Arrhythmias Ventricular

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

lidocaine

Initial dose: antiarrythmic drugs Lidocaine (1.5 mg / kg EV in 30 minutes).

Adittional dose: Lidocaine (0.75 mg / kg EV in 30 minutes).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Antiarrythmic Drugs

Intervention Type DRUG

Patient will be randomly randomized 1: 1 for the antiarrythmic drugs. If there is no reversal and there is no adverse event, a further dose of the same pre-administered medicinal product will be performed in another 30 minutes.

amiodarone

Initial dose: antiarrythmic drugs Amiodarone (5 mg / kg EV in 30 minutes)

Adittional dose: Amiodarone (3 mg / kg EV in 30 minutes)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Antiarrhythmic drugs

Intervention Type DRUG

Patient will be randomly randomized 1: 1 for the the antiarrythmic drugs. If there is no reversal and there is no adverse event, a further dose of the same pre-administered medicinal product will be performed in another 30 minutes.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Antiarrythmic Drugs

Patient will be randomly randomized 1: 1 for the antiarrythmic drugs. If there is no reversal and there is no adverse event, a further dose of the same pre-administered medicinal product will be performed in another 30 minutes.

Intervention Type DRUG

Antiarrhythmic drugs

Patient will be randomly randomized 1: 1 for the the antiarrythmic drugs. If there is no reversal and there is no adverse event, a further dose of the same pre-administered medicinal product will be performed in another 30 minutes.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

lidocaine amiodarone

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult men and women\> 18 years old
* Presence of sustained ventricular tachycardia with HR\> 120 bpm
* Systolic blood pressure\> 90 mmHg
* No signs of poor peripheral perfusion
* Absence of dyspnea
* Absence of severe angina
* Signed consent form

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy
* Hemodynamic instability
* Body mass index greater than 40 kg / m2
* Use of intravenous amiodarone or lidocaine in the last 24 hours
* Acute coronary syndrome
* Presence of tachycardia with irregular or supraventricular RR
* Contraindications to study drugs
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alexandre Soeiro, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Unidade Clínica de Emergência

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Instituto do Coração - HMFMUSP

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Alexandre Soeiro, MD

Role: CONTACT

1126615299

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Alexandre Soeiro, MD

Role: primary

5511-2661-5299

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Somberg JC, Bailin SJ, Haffajee CI, Paladino WP, Kerin NZ, Bridges D, Timar S, Molnar J; Amio-Aqueous Investigators. Intravenous lidocaine versus intravenous amiodarone (in a new aqueous formulation) for incessant ventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol. 2002 Oct 15;90(8):853-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02707-8.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 12372573 (View on PubMed)

Link MS, Berkow LC, Kudenchuk PJ, Halperin HR, Hess EP, Moitra VK, Neumar RW, O'Neil BJ, Paxton JH, Silvers SM, White RD, Yannopoulos D, Donnino MW. Part 7: Adult Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2015 Nov 3;132(18 Suppl 2):S444-64. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000261. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26472995 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PSInCor-AMIOLIDO-VT

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Recurrent Ventricular Arrythmias in ICU
NCT07033065 NOT_YET_RECRUITING