Automatic External Defibrillation Monitoring in Cardiac Arrest
NCT ID: NCT00382928
Last Updated: 2015-07-15
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
192 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-10-31
2009-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
We hypothesize that the automatic, rapid, accurate and specific diagnostic and therapeutic technology used in AECDs will further increase the rate of survival in patients with cardiac arrest through rapid and automatic defibrillation, independent of operator initiation, as compared to standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation initiated by healthcare providers.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Myocardial Injury in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Undergoing Defibrillation Threshold Testing
NCT04284800
The Role of Electrophysiology Testing in Survivors of Unexplained Cardiac Arrest
NCT03079414
Acute Defibrillation Study
NCT02227121
Electrophysiological Optimization of Left Ventricular Lead Placement in CRT
NCT02346097
Remote Interrogation in Rural Emergency Departments
NCT02421549
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Comparison: By using AECDs we will evaluate if an automatic, rapid, accurate and specific diagnostic technology will further increase the rate of survival in patients with VT/VF by rapid and automatic defibrillation, independent of operator initiation, as compared to standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with conventional defibrillators initiated by healthcare providers. This trial will be a randomized, controlled trial and will test if AECDs can improve outcome measures when compared to traditional responses.
Conventional defibrillators are manually operated defibrillators that have to be attached to the patient and operated by a healthcare provider or layperson. In contrast, the purpose of AECDs is to automatically detect life-threatening arrhythmias and deliver external shocks according to a programmable prescription for hospitalized patients, who may be at transient risk for the development of life-threatening arrhythmias. AECDs immediately and automatically monitor, detect and treat cardiac arrhythmias with no human intervention. The AECD proposed to be utilized in this trial, PowerHeart CRM, a product of Cardiac Science, Inc, has been evaluated in the hospital setting to assess safety and efficacy, and has been approved by the FDA to be prophylactically attached to hospital patients and provide automatic defibrillation therapy without human intervention.
All patients admitted to the telemetry unit will be asked to volunteer for this study. Up to 3,000 patients will be asked to volunteer in this study during their stay in the telemetry unit. This study will evaluate if there is a way to improve survival in CA by comparing two groups
Group 1: This group includes patients admitted to telemetry unit who will undergo standard measures of CPR in case cardiac arrest is suspected.
Group 2: This group includes patients admitted to telemetry unit who will have an AECD attached to the chest wall and who will also undergo standard measures of CPR in case of cardiac arrest.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard of Care Group
Patients will receive standard of care measures in case of cardiac arrest. They will not receive AECD monitoring or intervention
No interventions assigned to this group
AECD Monitoring + Standard of Care Group
Patients will receive AECD monitoring and intervention in addition to standard of care in case of cardiac arrest during admission to the hospital. Defibrillation of pulseless VT/VF by AECD.
Defibrillation of pulseless VT/VF by AECD
In case of cardiac arrest caused by shockable rhythms the automatic external cardioverter defibrillator (AECD) will automatically deliver defibrillation. Automated External Cardioverter Defibrillator (AECD; The PowerHeart CRM, Cardiac Science Inc., Seattle, WA) is a device attached to the chest wall by pads, monitors the electrocardiogram, and is capable of automatically delivering electric countershock to appropriate rhythms without operator intervention. The device will deliver only one shock of 150 Joules for pulseless ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Defibrillation of pulseless VT/VF by AECD
In case of cardiac arrest caused by shockable rhythms the automatic external cardioverter defibrillator (AECD) will automatically deliver defibrillation. Automated External Cardioverter Defibrillator (AECD; The PowerHeart CRM, Cardiac Science Inc., Seattle, WA) is a device attached to the chest wall by pads, monitors the electrocardiogram, and is capable of automatically delivering electric countershock to appropriate rhythms without operator intervention. The device will deliver only one shock of 150 Joules for pulseless ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age \> 18 years.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with R wave less than 0.5 millivolts.
* Patients with functioning Internal Cardiac Device.
* Patients with cardiac pacemakers if oversensing by AECD is demonstrated (double counting of pacer spikes).
* Patients with visible chest lesions that would prevent AECD pad placement.
* Patients who are designated Do Not Resuscitate.
* Right bundle branch block.
* Patients with Parkinson's disease.
* Patients with seizure disorders
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Emory University
OTHER
Foundation for Atlanta Veterans Education and Research, Inc.
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
A. Maziar Zafari
Chief, Cardiology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
A. Maziar Zafari, M.D., Ph.D
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Division of Cardiology, Atlanta Veterans Adminstration Medical Center/ Emory University, Decatur, GA
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Atlanta Veterans Adminstration Medical Center
Decatur, Georgia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ali B, Bloom H, Veledar E, House D, Norvel R, Dudley SC, Zafari AM. Automated external cardioversion defibrillation monitoring in cardiac arrest: a randomized trial. Trials. 2008 Jun 11;9:36. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-9-36.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Click here for detailed information about this study: Automated external cardioversion defibrillation monitoring in cardiac arrest: a randomized trial
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1216-2004
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.