Rotational Atherectomy Prior to Taxus Stent

NCT ID: NCT00380809

Last Updated: 2019-07-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

240 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-08-31

Study Completion Date

2011-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the long term effects of the polymer-based slow-release paclitaxel-eluting stent (TAXUS; Boston Scientific), with or without prior rotablation, in an angiographically well defined group of patients with complex calcified coronary lesions.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Calcification is an essential part of all atherosclerotic plaques. Its extent increases with the progression of atherosclerotic disease. Heavily calcified lesions form a particular threat to DES; both damage to the polymer coating during vigorous advancement and inadequate diffusion of the drug to the subintima through extensive calcium arcs could contribute to the ineffectiveness of DES when implanted into such lesions, or may lead to primary stent delivery or expansion failure. Rotational atherectomy can effectively ablate calcified plaques. In the DES era, data concerning rotational atherectomy are scarce. DES implantation following rotablation seems a rational combination, but is only poorly supported by controlled studies. In the present study, we are using the polymer-based slow-release paclitaxel-eluting stent (TAXUS; Boston Scientific), with or without prior rotablation, in an angiographically well defined group of patients with complex calcified coronary lesions. This prospective, randomized, controlled study aims at evaluating the long term effects of both strategies in this complex cohort of patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Complex Calcified Coronary Lesions

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Rotational Atherectomy + PES

Elective lesion preparation with rotational atherectomy priot to stent implantation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Rotational Atherectomy + PES

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Standard Treatment (PES without Rotational Atherectomy)

Stenting without prior rotational atherectomy, usually preceeded with balloon dilatation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard Treatment (PES without Rotational Atherectomy)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Rotational Atherectomy + PES

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Standard Treatment (PES without Rotational Atherectomy)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Angiographically proven coronary artery disease
* Angina II-IV° following the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification criteria and/or reproducible ischemia in the target area by ECG or scintigraphy
* The patient signing an informed written consent

From the following angiographic criteria, lesions must fulfil all first degree criteria and at least one second-degree criterion to be eligible for inclusion.

First degree criteria

* De-novo lesion in a native coronary artery
* Target reference vessel diameter between 2.5 and 4.0 mm by visual estimation
* Luminal diameter reduction of 70-99% by visual estimation
* Moderate to severe calcification of the target lesion (clearly defined)

Second degree criteria

* Ostial location
* Bifurcational lesions
* Long lesions (≥ 15mm)

Exclusion Criteria

* Myocardial infarction within 4 weeks
* Left ventricular ejection fraction \< 30%
* Limited long term prognosis due to other conditions


* Unprotected left main lesions
* Coronary artery bypass graft stenoses
* In-stent restenoses
* Chronic total occlusions
* Target vessel thrombus
* Target vessel dissection
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Segeberger Kliniken GmbH

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gert Richardt, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Herz-Kreislauf-Zentrum Segeberger Kliniken GmbH

Ahmed A. Khattab, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Herz-Kreislauf-Zentrum Segeberger Kliniken GmbH

Mohamed Abdel-Wahab, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Herz-Kreislauf-Zentrum Segeberger Kliniken GmbH

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Herz-Kreislauf-Zentrum Segeberger Kliniken GmbH

Bad Segeberg, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cox DA, Hermiller J, O'Shaughnessy C, Mann JT, Turco M, Caputo R, Bergin P, Greenberg J, Popma JJ, Russell ME; TAXUS-IV Investigators. A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jan 15;350(3):221-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032441.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14724301 (View on PubMed)

Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cox DA, Hermiller J, O'Shaughnessy C, Mann JT, Turco M, Caputo R, Bergin P, Greenberg J, Popma JJ, Russell ME; TAXUS-IV Investigators. One-year clinical results with the slow-release, polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent: the TAXUS-IV trial. Circulation. 2004 Apr 27;109(16):1942-7. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000127110.49192.72. Epub 2004 Apr 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15078803 (View on PubMed)

Morice MC, Serruys PW, Sousa JE, Fajadet J, Ban Hayashi E, Perin M, Colombo A, Schuler G, Barragan P, Guagliumi G, Molnar F, Falotico R; RAVEL Study Group. Randomized Study with the Sirolimus-Coated Bx Velocity Balloon-Expandable Stent in the Treatment of Patients with de Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions. A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jun 6;346(23):1773-80. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012843.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12050336 (View on PubMed)

Moses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ, Fitzgerald PJ, Holmes DR, O'Shaughnessy C, Caputo RP, Kereiakes DJ, Williams DO, Teirstein PS, Jaeger JL, Kuntz RE; SIRIUS Investigators. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med. 2003 Oct 2;349(14):1315-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa035071.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14523139 (View on PubMed)

Schofer J, Schluter M, Gershlick AH, Wijns W, Garcia E, Schampaert E, Breithardt G; E-SIRIUS Investigators. Sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of patients with long atherosclerotic lesions in small coronary arteries: double-blind, randomised controlled trial (E-SIRIUS). Lancet. 2003 Oct 4;362(9390):1093-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14462-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14550694 (View on PubMed)

Warth DC, Leon MB, O'Neill W, Zacca N, Polissar NL, Buchbinder M. Rotational atherectomy multicenter registry: acute results, complications and 6-month angiographic follow-up in 709 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Sep;24(3):641-8. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90009-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8077533 (View on PubMed)

Moussa I, Di Mario C, Moses J, Reimers B, Di Francesco L, Martini G, Tobis J, Colombo A. Coronary stenting after rotational atherectomy in calcified and complex lesions. Angiographic and clinical follow-up results. Circulation. 1997 Jul 1;96(1):128-36. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.1.128.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9236427 (View on PubMed)

Abdel-Wahab M, Richardt G, Joachim Buttner H, Toelg R, Geist V, Meinertz T, Schofer J, King L, Neumann FJ, Khattab AA. High-speed rotational atherectomy before paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in complex calcified coronary lesions: the randomized ROTAXUS (Rotational Atherectomy Prior to Taxus Stent Treatment for Complex Native Coronary Artery Disease) trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jan;6(1):10-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.07.017. Epub 2012 Dec 19.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23266232 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SK 106

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.