Safety and Efficacy of the ZoMaxx™ Drug-Eluting Stent System in Coronary Arteries

NCT ID: NCT00140101

Last Updated: 2012-01-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

1099 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-05-31

Study Completion Date

2012-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the ZoMaxx drug-eluting stent in patients with blockage of native coronary arteries. The study is designed to demonstrate non-inferiority to the TAXUS Express2 Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent that has proven superior to bare metal stents and is a recognized standard of care.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Coronary artery disease is the major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. The American Heart Association estimates that 571,000 Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) procedures were performed in 2001 in the United States and that 80% to 90% of these patients also underwent stent placement. Despite the effectiveness of intracoronary stents in maintaining a larger luminal diameter as compared to angioplasty alone, 15 to 35% in-stent restenosis occurs within 6 to 9 months after stent placement. While stents can reduce restenosis by blocking vascular recoil and remodeling, mechanical intervention alone is incapable of treating the biological problem of neointimal hyperplasia. Various approaches have been used to treat in-stent restenosis, including balloon angioplasty, repeat stenting, rotational and directional atherectomy, laser, and local delivery of radiation at the time of stenting (brachytherapy). However, these techniques add complexity to the interventional procedure and have not had documented success in preventing in-stent restenosis. Drug-eluting stents (DES) using antiproliferative agents delivered via a polymer based stent platform have shown significant success in the reduction of restenosis in de novo lesions over the traditional bare metal stents in randomized clinical trials. Local delivery of the pharmacological agent allows for controlled delivery of high drug concentrations to the targeted tissue while minimizing systemic drug effects. The ZoMaxx II Trial represents the first US study of the ZoMaxx(TM) Drug Eluting Coronary Stent System to evaluate the potential benefits of the local application of the zotarolimus drug in combination with a phosphorylcholine (PC)-coated tri-metal stent.

ZoMaxx™ Drug-Eluting Stent System is an Investigational device. Limited by Federal (U.S.) law to investigational use only.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Disease Coronary Artery Disease Coronary Restenosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

ZoMaxx™ Drug-Eluting Stent System

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ZoMaxx™ Drug-Eluting Coronary Stent System

Intervention Type DEVICE

Drug eluting stent implantation stent in the treatment of coronary artery disease.

2

TAXUS™ EXPRESS2™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent System

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

TAXUS™ EXPRESS2™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent

Intervention Type DEVICE

Drug eluting stent implantation stent in the treatment of coronary artery disease.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ZoMaxx™ Drug-Eluting Coronary Stent System

Drug eluting stent implantation stent in the treatment of coronary artery disease.

Intervention Type DEVICE

TAXUS™ EXPRESS2™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent

Drug eluting stent implantation stent in the treatment of coronary artery disease.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subject is ≥ 18 years old
* Subject is eligible for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and has a single lesion requiring treatment
* Subject is an acceptable candidate for CABG
* Clinical evidence of ischemic heart disease or a positive functional study
* Documented stable angina pectoris
* The target lesion is a single de novo coronary artery lesion with ≥50 and \<100% stenosis by visual estimate

Exclusion Criteria

* Female of childbearing potential. Female subjects must be medically or surgically sterile or diagnosed as post-menopausal (i.e. one year since final menstrual cycle.
* Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction and/or CK-MB\>2x upper limit of normal within 72 hours of the intended treatment
* Known allergies to the following: aspirin, clopidogrel (Plavix) or ticlopidine (Ticlid), heparin, stainless steel, tantalum, contrast agent (that cannot be adequately premedicated), paclitaxel or drugs similar to zotarolimus (ABT-578) (i.e. tacrolimus, sirolimus, everolimus)
* A platelet count \<100,000 cells/mm3or \>700,000 cells/mm3; a WBC \<3,000 cells/mm3; or hemoglobin \<10.0g/dL
* Acute or chronic renal dysfunction (creatinine \>2.0 mg/dl or \>150µmol/L)
* Subject has had any previous or planned brachytherapy in the target vessel
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Abbott Medical Devices

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alan Yeung, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Stanford University

David Lee, M.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Stanford University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Huntsville Hospital

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

ACS-Mesa General Hospital

Gilbert, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Foundation for Cardiovascular Medicine

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Scripps Memorial Hospital

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Sequoia Hospital

Redwood City, California, United States

Site Status

Stanford University Medical Center

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

University of Colorado

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Hartford Hospital

Hartford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Washington Hospital Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

University of Florida Health Science Center

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Univ of Florida Health Science Center Shands

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Florida Hospital

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Morton Plant Hospital

Safety Harbor, Florida, United States

Site Status

Emory Crawford Long Hospital

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Piedmont Hospital

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Emory Hospital

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

St. Joseph's Hospital of Atlanta

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

NE Georgia Medical Center

Gainesville, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Medical Center of Central GA (MCCG)

Macon, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Rush University Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

OSF St. Francis Medical Center

Peoria, Illinois, United States

Site Status

St. John's Hospital and Memorial Medical Center

Springfield, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Clarion Health/Methodist Hospital

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

The Heart Center of IN, LLC

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Genesis Medical Center

Davenport, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Iowa Heart Center/Methodist Hospital

Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Site Status

University of Iowa Hospital

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

University of Kansas Medical Center

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Central Baptist Hospital

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Ochsner Clinic Foundation

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

St. Joseph Medical Center

Towson, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Brigham & Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Cape Cod Research Institute

Hyannis, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

St. John's Hospital

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Northern Michigan Hospital

Petoskey, Michigan, United States

Site Status

William Beaumont Hospital

Royal Oak, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Abbott Northwestern Hospital

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Baptist Hospital Desoto

Southaven, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Barnes Jewish Hospital

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center

Cherry Hill, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center

Liverpool, New York, United States

Site Status

Lenox Hill Hospital

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

New York Presbyterian Hospital-Cornell

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Columbia Presbyterian Hospital

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

St. Francis Hospital

Roslyn, New York, United States

Site Status

Novant Medical Group

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wake Medical Hospital

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Forsyth Medical Center

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Aultman Health Foundation

Canton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

The Christ Hospital

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Riverside Methodist Hospital

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

EMH Regional Medical Center

Elyria, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma Heart

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Pinnacle Health at Harrisburg Hospital

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Hahnemann University Hospital Drexel University

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Thomas Jefferson University Hospital

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Univ of Pittsburgh Medical Center Health System

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Holy Spirit Hospital

Wormleysburg, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC)

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Erlanger Medical Center

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Lubbock Heart Hospital

Lubbock, Texas, United States

Site Status

Intermountain Medical Center

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Inova Fairfax Hospital

Falls Church, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Overlake Hospital Medical Center

Bellevue, Washington, United States

Site Status

North Cascade Cardiology / St. Joseph's Hospital

Bellingham, Washington, United States

Site Status

Swedish Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Deaconess Medical Center

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Heart Clinics Northwest/ Sacred Heart Medical Center

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

St. Luke's Medical Center

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

St. Vincent's Hospital Sydney

Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Eastern Heart Clinic, The Prince of Wales Hospital

Randwick, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

The Prince Charles Hospital

Chermside, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

The Princess Alexandra Hospital

Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Royal Adelaide Hospital

Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Monash Medical Center - Cardiovascular Research Centre

Clayton, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

St. Vincent's Hospital

Fitzroy, , Australia

Site Status

Liverpool Hospital

New South Wales, , Australia

Site Status

RWTH Aachen

Aachen, , Germany

Site Status

Charité - Campus Benjamin Franklin

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

St.Johannes Krankenhaus

Dortmund, , Germany

Site Status

UKE Hamburg - Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Uniklinik Homburg

Homburg, , Germany

Site Status

Leipzig Heart Center

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Uniklinik Mainz - Johannes Gutenberg Universitat

Mainz, , Germany

Site Status

Krankenhaus Siegburg - Heart Center Siegburg

Siegburg, , Germany

Site Status

Auckland City Hospital

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Christchurch Hospital

Christchurch, , New Zealand

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Germany New Zealand

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gray WA, Yeung AC, Cutlip DE, Popma JJ, Fitzgerald PJ, Williams DO, Heuer H, O'Shaughnessy CD, Overlie PA, Mann JT, Cannon LA, Hermiller JB, Henry TD, Whitbourn R, Stuckey TD, Midei MG, Coe J, Schwartz LB. A randomized, controlled, multi-center trial comparing the safety and efficacy of zotarolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo lesions in coronary arteries: final results of the ZoMaxx II trial. Int J Cardiol. 2012 May 17;157(1):96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.05.061. Epub 2011 Jun 11.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21658783 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

96039

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

640-0048

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The TRIMAXX Coronary Stent Trial
NCT00596661 COMPLETED PHASE1
The Medtronic RESOLUTE Clinical Trial
NCT00248079 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2
TAXUS PERSEUS Small Vessel
NCT00489541 COMPLETED PHASE3