Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
3 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-05-31
2011-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
TMS Treatment for Pain in Chronic Pancreatitis
NCT00250484
tDCS for the Management of Chronic Visceral Pain in Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis
NCT01857492
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Cancer Pain Management
NCT06949618
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Effects on Pain Perception
NCT01861574
RTMS for Treatment of Pain and Craving
NCT03310138
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Visceral sensation is processed in the secondary somatosensory area (SII). Therefore, pancreatic cancer pain may be sustained by dysfunction of SII rather than by local effects of the cancer alone. We hypothesize further, that dysfunction of SII is one of hyper-excitability. According to this hypothesis, suppression of SII activity may help control the pain in patients with pancreatic cancer and may provide synergy with pharmacologic treatment.
Temporary inhibition of SII activity can be obtained by a novel, non-invasive procedure called transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). TMS can suppress brain excitability beyond the duration of the direct application of TMS if appropriate stimulation parameters are utilized. This hypothesis is supported by a sham controlled, double blind pilot trial of 5 subjects with idiopathic chronic pancreatitis: active rTMS applied to SII resulted in significant pain improvement in three of the subjects while sham did not provide any benefit in any of these patients. Furthermore, recent evidence suggests that stimulation of other brain areas, such as the dorsolateral pre-frontal cortex, can modulate acute, experimentally invoked pain (Graff-Guerrero et al 2005).
We will rigorously test the hypothesis that pain due to pancreatic cancer is sustained by dysfunction of SII characterized by hyperexcitability through two specific aims:
1. The first aim of this study is to examine whether 1Hz repetitive TMS (rTMS) applied to SII for ten days during two consecutive weeks in patients with abdominal pain due to pancreatic cancer has an analgesic effect.
1. The primary outcome for this aim is the difference in pain score level on the Visual Analogue Scale at Day 11 and at Day 28 compared to the week before rTMS. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in pain score between pre and post-treatment.
2. The secondary outcome for this aim is to assess the difference in the use of narcotics for pain control on Day 11 and Day 28 compared to Day 1. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in narcotic use (in IV morphine equivalency units) between pre and post-treatment.
2. The second aim of the study is to assess the safety of rTMS in patients with pancreatic cancer.
3. The third aim of this study is to investigate whether rTMS treatment is associated with a change in the activity of right SII using magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Therefore we will compare the levels of these substances between the two different time points (baseline and post-treatment) and between left and right SII. We expect a decrease in the excitatory neurotransmitters levels (Glutamine - Glx) in the stimulated area as a result of the inhibitory rTMS.
SAFETY In a pilot study of chronic pancreatitis patients, no subject experienced adverse effects from a single session of rTMS. Subjects in an ongoing study of a 10-day course or rTMS in chronic pancreatitis patients also have not experienced adverse events (10 patients thus far). Fifteen-day courses of rTMS have been used for the treatment of various neuropsychiatric diseases without any complications if safety guidelines are carefully followed. We will adhere to the current safety recommendations for rTMS endorsed by the International Society for Transcranial Stimulation and the International Federation for Clinical Neurophysiology. Therefore, we hypothesize that the proposed rTMS protocol will be safe for our patient population.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)
This arm provides active 1Hz repetitive TMS (rTMS) applied to SII
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
1Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for 10 days 26 minutes each day
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Sham
This arm provides sham 1Hz repetitive TMS (rTMS) applied to SII
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
1Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for 10 days 26 minutes each day
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
1Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for 10 days 26 minutes each day
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Abdominal pain attributable to pancreatic cancer that requires daily narcotic use
* Stable narcotic dosage the week before study entry
* A computed tomography of the abdomen within four weeks of study entry
* CA19-9 within four weeks of study entry
* ECOG Performance status \>=3
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with major depression with suicidal risk
* Prior neurosurgical procedures
* History of epilepsy
* Previous head injury
* History of Stroke
* Abnormal neurological examination other than as signs of the condition studied in the present protocol
* Contraindication to TMS:
Implanted pacemaker;Medication pump;Vagal stimulator;Deep brain stimulator;Metallic hardware in the head or scalp: shrapnel, surgical clips, or fragments from welding;Signs of increased intracranial pressure
* TENS unit and ventriculo-peritoneal shunt
* Pregnancy
Unable to undergo a brain MR
* claustrophobia refractory to anxiolytics
* ferromagnetic metal in the body such as a prosthetic heart valve, a pacemaker, or a brain aneurysm clip).
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
NIH
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Felipe Fregni
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Felipe Fregni, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
TMS for the treatment of Chronic Pancreatitis
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2005P000311
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.