Safety and Efficacy of Dexlansoprazole Modified Release Formulation to Treat Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

NCT ID: NCT00321984

Last Updated: 2011-04-28

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

947 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-06-30

Study Completion Date

2006-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of Dexlansoprazole modified release (MR) (30 mg once daily \[QD\] or 60 mg QD) compared to placebo in relief of daytime and nighttime heartburn over 4 weeks in subjects with symptomatic, nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled, 3-arm study with a 4 week treatment period. This study will compare the efficacy of Dexlansoprazole MR (30 mg QD and 60 mg QD) with that of placebo when administered orally as a single daily dose in the morning, before breakfast. The study is designed to evaluate symptom relief in subjects with symptomatic nonerosive GERD. Approximately 900 subjects will be enrolled at approximately 200 United States (US) and potentially ex-US sites. The study consists of two periods: a screening period, which will last a minimum of 7 days and a maximum of 21 days, and a treatment period, which will last 4 weeks.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Dexlansoprazole MR 30 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dexlansoprazole MR

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexlansoprazole MR 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for 4 weeks.

Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dexlansoprazole MR

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for 4 weeks.

Placebo

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexlansoprazole placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for 4 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dexlansoprazole MR

Dexlansoprazole MR 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for 4 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexlansoprazole MR

Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for 4 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Dexlansoprazole placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for 4 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

TAK-390MR Kapidex Dexilant TAK-390MR Kapidex Dexilant

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subjects identifying their main symptom as a burning feeling in the mid epigastric area and/or chest area (ie, heartburn).
* Subject has a history of episodes of heartburn for 6 months or longer prior to Screening.
* Subject must have a history of episodes of heartburn for 4 or more days during the 7 days prior to Day -1.

Exclusion Criteria

* Endoscopic Barrett's esophagus and/or definite dysplastic changes. History of dilatation of esophageal strictures.
* Subjects with erosive esophagitis (EE) as shown by endoscopy.
* Evidence of uncontrolled systemic disease. Co-existing diseases affecting the esophagus. Current or history of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.
* Subject has abnormal laboratory values.
* Subjects with active gastric or duodenal ulcers within 4 weeks of the first dose.
* Subject known to have acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS).
* Known hypersensitivity to any proton pump inhibitor (PPI), any component of Dexlansoprazole MR, or antacid.
* Use of prescription or non-prescription PPIs, histamine (H2) receptor antagonists, or sucralfate.
* Chronic (\>12 doses per month) use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors.
* Use of antacids (except for study-supplied GelusilĀ® ).
* Use of drugs with significant anticholinergic effects.
* Subjects who cannot discontinue the use of misoprostol or prokinetics
* Need for continuous anticoagulant therapy.
* Females who are pregnant or lactating.
* History of gastrointestinal surgery except for simple oversew of ulcer.
* History of cancer within 3 years prior to screening.
* Subject has participated in a previous Dexlansoprazole study.
* Subjects who, in the opinion of the investigator, are unable to comply with the requirements of the study or are unsuitable for any reason.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Takeda

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc.

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Medical Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Takeda

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Alabaster, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Hueytown, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Northport, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Tallassee, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Chandler, Arizona, United States

Site Status

North Little Rock, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Sun City, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tempe, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Azusa, California, United States

Site Status

Carmichael, California, United States

Site Status

Chula Vista, California, United States

Site Status

Clearwater, California, United States

Site Status

Cypress, California, United States

Site Status

Fountain Valley, California, United States

Site Status

Fullerton, California, United States

Site Status

Garden Grove, California, United States

Site Status

Irvine, California, United States

Site Status

Lancaster, California, United States

Site Status

Mission Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Oakland, California, United States

Site Status

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Palm Springs, California, United States

Site Status

Pasadena, California, United States

Site Status

Redwood City, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

San Luis Obispo, California, United States

Site Status

Vista, California, United States

Site Status

Westlake Village, California, United States

Site Status

Boulder, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Littleton, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Lone Tree, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Wheat Ridge, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Bristol, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Waterbury, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Boynton Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

Holly Hill, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jupitor, Florida, United States

Site Status

Kissimmee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Naples, Florida, United States

Site Status

New Smyma Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ocala, Florida, United States

Site Status

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Zephyrhills, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Conyers, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Dunwoody, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Stockbridge, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Boise, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Moline, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Oak Forrest, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Rockford, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Clive, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Dubuque, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Overland, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Metairie, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Hollywood, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Lutherville, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Prince Frederick, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Troy, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Chaska, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Olive Branch, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Jefferson City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Mexico, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Washington, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Butte, Montana, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Pahrump, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Egg Harbor Town, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Binghamton, New York, United States

Site Status

Great Neck, New York, United States

Site Status

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Harrisburg, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

High Point, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Statesville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Bismarck, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Franklin, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Kettering, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Lyndhurst, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Mogadore, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Sylvania, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Medford, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Harleysville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Lansdale, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Levittown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Anderson, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Varnville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Bristol, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Germantown, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Hermitage, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Johnson City, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Kingsport, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Amarillo, Texas, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Beaumont, Texas, United States

Site Status

Bellaire, Texas, United States

Site Status

Bryan, Texas, United States

Site Status

Carollton, Texas, United States

Site Status

Conroe, Texas, United States

Site Status

Corsicana, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

El Paso, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Lake Jackson, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Midvale, Utah, United States

Site Status

Ogden, Utah, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Chesapeake, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Norfold, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Lakewood, Washington, United States

Site Status

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Monroe, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Fass R, Chey WD, Zakko SF, Andhivarothai N, Palmer RN, Perez MC, Atkinson SN. Clinical trial: the effects of the proton pump inhibitor dexlansoprazole MR on daytime and nighttime heartburn in patients with non-erosive reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Jun 15;29(12):1261-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04013.x. Epub 2009 Apr 8.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19392864 (View on PubMed)

Peura DA, Metz DC, Dabholkar AH, Paris MM, Yu P, Atkinson SN. Safety profile of dexlansoprazole MR, a proton pump inhibitor with a novel dual delayed release formulation: global clinical trial experience. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Nov 15;30(10):1010-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04137.x. Epub 2009 Sep 4.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19735233 (View on PubMed)

Friedlander EA, Pallentino J, Miller SK, VanBeuge SS. The evolution of proton pump inhibitors for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2010 Dec;22(12):674-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2010.00578.x. Epub 2010 Nov 24.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21129076 (View on PubMed)

Peura DA, Pilmer B, Hunt B, Mody R, Perez MC. Distinguishing the impact of dexlansoprazole on heartburn vs. regurgitation in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Nov;38(10):1303-11. doi: 10.1111/apt.12504. Epub 2013 Sep 30.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24118079 (View on PubMed)

Peura DA, Pilmer B, Hunt B, Mody R, Perez MC. The effects of increasing body mass index on heartburn severity, frequency and response to treatment with dexlansoprazole or lansoprazole. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Apr;37(8):810-8. doi: 10.1111/apt.12270. Epub 2013 Mar 4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23451835 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2006-000420-13

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

U1111-1114-1935

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

T-GD05-137

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.