Safety and Efficacy of Dexlansoprazole Modified Release Formulation to Treat Heartburn

NCT ID: NCT00251758

Last Updated: 2010-05-18

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

908 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-12-31

Study Completion Date

2006-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of daily treatment with Dexlansoprazole modified release (MR) (60 mg or 90 mg once daily \[QD\]) compared to placebo QD in relief of daytime and nighttime heartburn over 4 weeks in subjects with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multi-center, placebo-controlled, 3-arm study with a 4 week treatment period. This study will compare the efficacy of daily Dexlansoprazole MR (60 mg and 90 mg) with that of placebo when administered orally as a single daily dose in the morning, before breakfast. The study is designed to evaluate symptom relief in subjects with symptomatic non-erosive GERD. Approximately 450 subjects will be enrolled at approximately 120 U.S. and potentially ex U.S. sites. The study consists of two periods; a Screening Period, which will last a minimum of 7 days and a maximum of 21 days, and a treatment period, which will last 4 weeks.

Because the development plan for Dexlansoprazole MR was revised, the results of 2 identical studies, T-GD04-082 (NCT00241745) and T-GD04-083 (this posting, NCT00251758), were combined and analyzed as a single larger study, referred to as study T-GD04-082. A total of 908 subjects were included in the combined analysis; 416 subjects were enrolled into Study T-GD04-082 and 492 subjects were enrolled into Study T-GD04-083.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dexlansoprazole MR

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for 4 weeks.

Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dexlansoprazole MR

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for 4 weeks.

Placebo

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexlansoprazole placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for 4 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dexlansoprazole MR

Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for 4 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexlansoprazole MR

Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for 4 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Dexlansoprazole placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for 4 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

TAK-390MR Kapidex Dexilant TAK-390MR Kapidex Dexilant

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subjects with Non-Erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease identifying their main symptom as heartburn.

* History of episodes of heartburn for 6 months or longer prior to screening.
* History of episodes of heartburn for 4 or more days during the 7 days prior to Day -1 as recorded in the electronic diary.

Exclusion Criteria

* Use of prescription or non-prescription proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine (H2) receptor antagonists, sucralfate, misoprostol or prokinetics throughout the study
* Erosive Esophagitis seen on endoscopy during study screening.
* Co-existing diseases affecting the esophagus.
* Abnormal laboratory values that suggest significant clinical disease.
* Known acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)
* Females pregnant or lactating.
* History of Alcohol abuse.
* History of Cancer within 3 years prior to screening.
* Chronic (\>12 doses per month) use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors
* Use of antacids (except for study supplied GelusilĀ® )
* Use of drugs with significant anticholinergic effects
* Need for continuous anticoagulant (blood thinner) therapy
* Endoscopic Barrett's esophagus and/or definite dysplastic changes in the esophagus
* History of dilatation of esophageal strictures, other than a Schatzki's ring (a ring of mucosal tissue near the lower esophageal sphincter)
* Current or historical evidence of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome or other hypersecretory condition
* History of gastric, duodenal or esophageal surgery except simple oversew of an ulcer
* Subjects who, in the opinion of the investigator, are unable to comply with the requirements of the study or are unsuitable for any reason.
* Acute upper gastrointestinal (UGI) hemorrhage within 4 weeks of the Screening endoscopy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Takeda

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc.

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Medical Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Takeda

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Anniston, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Hueytown, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Tallassee, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

North Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Azusa, California, United States

Site Status

Carmichael, California, United States

Site Status

Cypress, California, United States

Site Status

Fresno, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Modesto, California, United States

Site Status

Newport Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Oakland, California, United States

Site Status

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Maria, California, United States

Site Status

Littleton, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Longmont, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Wheat Ridge, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Bristol, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Newark, Delaware, United States

Site Status

Fort Myers, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Naples, Florida, United States

Site Status

New Smyrna Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ocala, Florida, United States

Site Status

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

Port Orange, Florida, United States

Site Status

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

Zephyrhills, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Champaign, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Moline, Illinois, United States

Site Status

North Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Oak Forest, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Springfield, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Evansville, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Newburgh, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Davenport, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Prince Frederick, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Jefferson City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Missoula, Montana, United States

Site Status

Egg Harbor, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

High Point, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wilmington, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Bismarck, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Akron, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Mogadore, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Medford, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Warwick, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Anderson, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Germantown, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Johnson City, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Kingsport, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Amarillo, Texas, United States

Site Status

Conroe, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Odessa, Texas, United States

Site Status

Pharr, Texas, United States

Site Status

Seguin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Temple, Texas, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Bellevue, Washington, United States

Site Status

Lakewood, Washington, United States

Site Status

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U1111-1114-1811

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

T-GD04-083

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.