Efficacy and Safety of Dexlansoprazole MR and Lansoprazole on Healing of Erosive Esophagitis

NCT ID: NCT00251693

Last Updated: 2012-02-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

2038 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-12-31

Study Completion Date

2007-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of 8 weeks of once-daily (QD) treatment with dexlansoprazole modified release (MR) 60 mg or 90 mg or lansoprazole 30 mg in healing subjects with endoscopically proven erosive esophagitis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multi-center, active-controlled, 3-arm study with an 8-week treatment period. This study will compare the efficacy of dexlansoprazole MR (60 mg QD and 90 mg QD) with that of lansoprazole (30 mg) when administered orally as a single daily dose in the morning, before breakfast. The study is designed to evaluate healing of erosive esophagitis and the effect of the therapy on relieving gastroesophageal reflux disease-related symptoms. The study consists of two periods, a screening period (maximum 21 days) and a treatment period, which will last 8 weeks.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Esophagitis, Reflux Esophagitis, Peptic

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dexlansoprazole MR

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg, capsules, orally, once daily (QD) for up to 8 weeks.

Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dexlansoprazole MR

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.

Lansoprazole 30 mg QD

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lansoprazole

Intervention Type DRUG

Lansoprazole 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dexlansoprazole MR

Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg, capsules, orally, once daily (QD) for up to 8 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexlansoprazole MR

Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Lansoprazole

Lansoprazole 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

TAK-390MR Kapidex Dexilant TAK-390MR Kapidex Dexilant Prevacid AG-1749

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subject must have endoscopically confirmed erosive esophagitis as defined by the Los Angeles (LA) Classification Grading System (A-D)

Exclusion Criteria

* Subject has a positive Campylobacter-like organisms (CLO) test for Helicobacter (H.) pylori.
* Use of prescription or non-prescription proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine (H2) receptor antagonists or sucralfate, drugs with significant anticholinergic effects, misoprostol or prokinetics
* Use of antacids \[except for study supplied Gelusil®\]
* Need for continuous anticoagulant therapy (blood thinners)
* Endoscopic Barrett's esophagus and/or definite dysplastic changes in the esophagus
* History of dilatation of esophageal strictures, other than Schatzki's ring (a ring of mucosal tissue near the lower esophageal sphincter)
* Current or historical evidence of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome or other hypersecretory condition.
* History of gastric, duodenal or esophageal surgery except simple oversew of an ulcer.
* Acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage within 4 weeks of the screening endoscopy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Takeda

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Medical Director

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Takeda

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Alabaster, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Chula Vista, California, United States

Site Status

Fullerton, California, United States

Site Status

Garden Grove, California, United States

Site Status

Irvine, California, United States

Site Status

Lancaster, California, United States

Site Status

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Mission Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Palm Springs, California, United States

Site Status

Pasadena, California, United States

Site Status

Redwood City, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

San Luis Obispo, California, United States

Site Status

Boulder, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Lone Tree, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Wheat Ridge, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Waterbury, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Boynton Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonsville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jupiter, Florida, United States

Site Status

Kissimmee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Lakeland, Florida, United States

Site Status

New Port Richey, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Arlington Heights, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Hines, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Oak Park, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Rockford, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Clive, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Dubuque, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Newton, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Shawnee Mission, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Topeka, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Metairie, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Hollywood, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Lutherville, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Troy, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Chaska, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Mexico, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Washington, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Pahrump, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Binghamton, New York, United States

Site Status

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

Great Neck, New York, United States

Site Status

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Elkin, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Hickory, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Salisbury, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Statesville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Beachwood, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Mayfield Heights, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Warren, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Beaver Falls, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Lansdale, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Bristol, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Hermitage, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Beaumont, Texas, United States

Site Status

Byran, Texas, United States

Site Status

Corsicana, Texas, United States

Site Status

El Paso, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Bountiful, Utah, United States

Site Status

Ogden, Utah, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

West Jordan, Utah, United States

Site Status

Chesapeake, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Danville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Monroe, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Box Hill, , Australia

Site Status

South Brisbane, , Australia

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Site Status

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Hamburg, City state of Hamburg, Germany

Site Status

Dietzenback, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Schweim, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Borna, Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Gyula, , Hungary

Site Status

Gujarat, Ahmedabad, India

Site Status

Tamilnadu, Chennai, India

Site Status

Rajasthan, Jaipur, India

Site Status

Ludhiana, Punjab, India

Site Status

Madurai, Tamina, India

Site Status

Chennai, , India

Site Status

Coimbatore, , India

Site Status

Hyderabad, , India

Site Status

New Delhi, , India

Site Status

Visakhapatnam, , India

Site Status

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Kaunas, , Lithuania

Site Status

Hamilton, , New Zealand

Site Status

Lima, , Peru

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Lubin, , Poland

Site Status

Sopot, , Poland

Site Status

Warzawa, , Poland

Site Status

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Nitra, , Slovakia

Site Status

Sučany, , Slovakia

Site Status

Tmava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Gauteng, Johannesburg, South Africa

Site Status

Cape Town, WC, South Africa

Site Status

Panorama, WC, South Africa

Site Status

Pinelands, WC, South Africa

Site Status

Plumstead, WC, South Africa

Site Status

Somerset West, WC, South Africa

Site Status

Pretoria, , South Africa

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Bulgaria Canada Czechia Germany Hungary India Latvia Lithuania New Zealand Peru Poland Slovakia South Africa

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sharma P, Shaheen NJ, Perez MC, Pilmer BL, Lee M, Atkinson SN, Peura D. Clinical trials: healing of erosive oesophagitis with dexlansoprazole MR, a proton pump inhibitor with a novel dual delayed-release formulation--results from two randomized controlled studies. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Apr 1;29(7):731-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.03933.x.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19183157 (View on PubMed)

Peura DA, Metz DC, Dabholkar AH, Paris MM, Yu P, Atkinson SN. Safety profile of dexlansoprazole MR, a proton pump inhibitor with a novel dual delayed release formulation: global clinical trial experience. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Nov 15;30(10):1010-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04137.x. Epub 2009 Sep 4.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19735233 (View on PubMed)

Wyrwich KW, Mody R, Larsen LM, Lee M, Harnam N, Revicki DA. Validation of the PAGI-SYM and PAGI-QOL among healing and maintenance of erosive esophagitis clinical trial participants. Qual Life Res. 2010 May;19(4):551-64. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9620-x. Epub 2010 Feb 27.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20195905 (View on PubMed)

Friedlander EA, Pallentino J, Miller SK, VanBeuge SS. The evolution of proton pump inhibitors for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2010 Dec;22(12):674-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2010.00578.x. Epub 2010 Nov 24.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21129076 (View on PubMed)

Peura DA, Pilmer B, Hunt B, Mody R, Perez MC. Distinguishing the impact of dexlansoprazole on heartburn vs. regurgitation in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Nov;38(10):1303-11. doi: 10.1111/apt.12504. Epub 2013 Sep 30.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24118079 (View on PubMed)

Peura DA, Pilmer B, Hunt B, Mody R, Perez MC. The effects of increasing body mass index on heartburn severity, frequency and response to treatment with dexlansoprazole or lansoprazole. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Apr;37(8):810-8. doi: 10.1111/apt.12270. Epub 2013 Mar 4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23451835 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U1111-1113-9373

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

T-EE04-084

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.