Efficacy and Safety of Dexlansoprazole MR and Lansoprazole on Healing of Erosive Esophagitis

NCT ID: NCT00251719

Last Updated: 2012-02-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

2054 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-12-31

Study Completion Date

2007-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a study to assess the efficacy and safety of 8 weeks of treatment with Dexlansoprazole modified release (MR)(60 mg daily and 90 mg daily) compared to Lansoprazole (30 mg daily) in healing subjects with endoscopically proven erosive esophagitis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multi-center, active-controlled, 3-arm study with an 8 week treatment period. This study will compare the efficacy of Dexlansoprazole MR (60 mg and 90 mg) with that of Lansoprazole (30 mg) when administered orally as a single daily dose in the morning, before breakfast. The study is designed to evaluate healing of erosive esophagitis and the effect of the therapy on relieving gastroesophageal reflux disease related symptoms. The study consists of two periods, a screening period (maximum 21 days) and a treatment period, which will last up to 8 weeks.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Esophagitis, Reflux Esophagitis, Peptic

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dexlansoprazole MR

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg, capsules, orally, once daily (QD) for up to 8 weeks.

Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dexlansoprazole MR

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.

Lansoprazole 30 mg QD

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lansoprazole

Intervention Type DRUG

Lansoprazole 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dexlansoprazole MR

Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg, capsules, orally, once daily (QD) for up to 8 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexlansoprazole MR

Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Lansoprazole

Lansoprazole 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

TAK-390MR Kapidex Dexilant TAK-390MR Kapidex Dexilant Prevacid AG-1749

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subject must have endoscopically confirmed erosive esophagitis as defined by the Los Angeles (LA) Classification Grading System (A-D).

Exclusion Criteria

* Subject has a positive Campylobacter-like organisms (CLO) test for Helicobacter (H.) pylori.
* Use of prescription or non-prescription proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine (H2) receptor antagonists or sucralfate, drugs with significant anticholinergic effects, misoprostol or prokinetics
* Use of antacids \[except for study supplied Gelusil®\]
* Need for continuous anticoagulant therapy (Blood Thinners)
* Endoscopic Barrett's esophagus and/or definite dysplastic changes in the esophagus
* History of dilatation of esophageal strictures, other than Schatzki's ring (a ring of mucosal tissue near the lower esophageal sphincter)
* Current or historical evidence of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome or other hypersecretory condition
* History of gastric, duodenal or esophageal surgery except simple oversew of an ulcer
* Acute upper gastrointestinal (UGI) hemorrhage within 4 weeks of the Screening endoscopy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Takeda

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Medical Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Takeda

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Anniston, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Hueytown, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Tallassee, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

North Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Azusa, California, United States

Site Status

Carmichael, California, United States

Site Status

Cypress, California, United States

Site Status

Fresno, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Modesto, California, United States

Site Status

Newport Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Oakland, California, United States

Site Status

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Maria, California, United States

Site Status

Littleton, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Longmont, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Wheat Ridge, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Bristol, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Newark, Delaware, United States

Site Status

Fort Myers, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Naples, Florida, United States

Site Status

New Smyrna Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ocala, Florida, United States

Site Status

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

Port Orange, Florida, United States

Site Status

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

Zephyrhills, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Boise, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Moline, Illinois, United States

Site Status

North Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Oak Forest, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Evansville, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Newburgh, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Davenport, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Prince Frederick, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Jefferson City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Missoula, Montana, United States

Site Status

Egg Harbor, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Harrisburg, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

High Point, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wilmington, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Bismarck, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Akron, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Mogadore, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Medford, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Warwick, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Anderson, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Germantown, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Johnson City, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Kingsport, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Amarillo, Texas, United States

Site Status

Conroe, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Odessa, Texas, United States

Site Status

Pharr, Texas, United States

Site Status

Seguin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Temple, Texas, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Bellevue, Washington, United States

Site Status

Lakewood, Washington, United States

Site Status

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Adelaide, , Australia

Site Status

Bedford Park, , Australia

Site Status

Kippa-Ring, , Australia

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Newmarket, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

Cundinamarca, Bogota D.C., Colombia

Site Status

Barranquilla - Atlantico, , Colombia

Site Status

Hradec Králové, , Czechia

Site Status

Ostrava - Hrabuvka, , Czechia

Site Status

Stuttgart, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany

Site Status

Bratislava, , Germany

Site Status

Hyderabad, Andh Prad, India

Site Status

Bangalore, Kama, India

Site Status

Ludhiana, Punjab, India

Site Status

Hyderabad, , India

Site Status

Pune, , India

Site Status

Hamburg, HH, Latvia

Site Status

Balvi, , Latvia

Site Status

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Valmiera, , Latvia

Site Status

Panevezys, , Lithuania

Site Status

Vinius, , Lithuania

Site Status

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Lima, , Peru

Site Status

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Mangalore, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Yaroslavi, , Russia

Site Status

Daugavpils, , Slovakia

Site Status

Košice, , Slovakia

Site Status

Prešov, , Slovakia

Site Status

Bloemfontein, Free State, South Africa

Site Status

Cape Town, WC, South Africa

Site Status

Observatory, Cape Town, WC, South Africa

Site Status

Parktown, Gauteng, , South Africa

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Bulgaria Canada Colombia Czechia Germany India Latvia Lithuania New Zealand Peru Poland Russia Slovakia South Africa

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sharma P, Shaheen NJ, Perez MC, Pilmer BL, Lee M, Atkinson SN, Peura D. Clinical trials: healing of erosive oesophagitis with dexlansoprazole MR, a proton pump inhibitor with a novel dual delayed-release formulation--results from two randomized controlled studies. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Apr 1;29(7):731-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.03933.x.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19183157 (View on PubMed)

Peura DA, Metz DC, Dabholkar AH, Paris MM, Yu P, Atkinson SN. Safety profile of dexlansoprazole MR, a proton pump inhibitor with a novel dual delayed release formulation: global clinical trial experience. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Nov 15;30(10):1010-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04137.x. Epub 2009 Sep 4.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19735233 (View on PubMed)

Wyrwich KW, Mody R, Larsen LM, Lee M, Harnam N, Revicki DA. Validation of the PAGI-SYM and PAGI-QOL among healing and maintenance of erosive esophagitis clinical trial participants. Qual Life Res. 2010 May;19(4):551-64. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9620-x. Epub 2010 Feb 27.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20195905 (View on PubMed)

Friedlander EA, Pallentino J, Miller SK, VanBeuge SS. The evolution of proton pump inhibitors for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2010 Dec;22(12):674-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2010.00578.x. Epub 2010 Nov 24.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21129076 (View on PubMed)

Peura DA, Pilmer B, Hunt B, Mody R, Perez MC. Distinguishing the impact of dexlansoprazole on heartburn vs. regurgitation in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Nov;38(10):1303-11. doi: 10.1111/apt.12504. Epub 2013 Sep 30.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24118079 (View on PubMed)

Peura DA, Pilmer B, Hunt B, Mody R, Perez MC. The effects of increasing body mass index on heartburn severity, frequency and response to treatment with dexlansoprazole or lansoprazole. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Apr;37(8):810-8. doi: 10.1111/apt.12270. Epub 2013 Mar 4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23451835 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U1111-1114-0058

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

T-EE04-085

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.