Comparing the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Rabeprazole ER 50 mg With Placebo in Subjects With Symptomatic Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (sGERD)

NCT ID: NCT00911534

Last Updated: 2016-02-02

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

305 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-01-31

Study Completion Date

2009-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of rabeprazole extended release (ER) 50 mg with placebo in subjects with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (sGERD).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Symptomatic Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (sGERD)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

rabeprazole sodium

Intervention Type DRUG

One rabeprazole extended release (ER) 50 mg capsule daily; rescue medication will be provided to subjects to take as needed.

2

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

One rabeprazole placebo capsule daily; rescue medication will be provided to subjects to take as needed.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

rabeprazole sodium

One rabeprazole extended release (ER) 50 mg capsule daily; rescue medication will be provided to subjects to take as needed.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

One rabeprazole placebo capsule daily; rescue medication will be provided to subjects to take as needed.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

rabeprazole sodium extended release

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Male or female, ages 18 through 75 years will be included in the study. Females should be either of nonchildbearing potential or of childbearing potential. Females of childbearing potential must have negative serum and urine pregnancy tests prior to randomization. Female subjects of childbearing potential must agree to use medically acceptable methods of contraception starting at Visit 1 and throughout the entire study period and for 1 month after the last dose of study drug. Women using hormonal contraceptives must also be using an additional approved method of contraception starting at Visit 1 and throughout the entire study period and for 1 month after the last dose of study drug. Pregnant or lactating females are excluded. Subjects must have a history of heartburn, identified as their main complaint, for 6 months or longer.Subjects must have documentation of a minimum of 5 moderate to severe heartburn episodes, 3 of which occur during the daytime and 1 of which occurs during the nighttime, during the last 7 days before randomization. Subjects must be able to read, write, and understand the language of the symptom dairy.

Exclusion Criteria

Subjects will be excluded from the study if they are found to have erosive esophagitis during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) at Screening, current or a history of esophageal motility disorders, current or a history of Barrett's esophagus, current esophageal strictures or esophagitis (known or suspected to be due to etiology other than GERD such as infection or medications), current or a history of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and acid hypersecretory conditions, or current gastric or duodenal ulcer. Subjects will be excluded if they are found to have current or a history of cancer, with the exception of fully excised skin basal cell carcinoma, inflammatory bowel disease, a history of esophageal, gastric and duodenal surgery, except simple closure of a perforated ulcer. Subjects will be excluded who require daily use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), oral steroids (\>=20 mg/day prednisone or equivalent), or aspirin (\>325 mg/day). Female subjects will be excluded who are pregnant, lactating, or have a positive B-human gonadotropin test at Screening/Baseline. Subjects will be excluded who are known to be human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive, have participated in another investigational drug study within 30 days prior to screening or are expected to receive an investigational drug during this trial. Subjects who are unwilling to provide informed consent will be excluded.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Eisai Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Guillermo Rossiter, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Eisai Inc.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Athens, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Encinitas, California, United States

Site Status

Irvine, California, United States

Site Status

Lancaster, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Merced, California, United States

Site Status

Oceanside, California, United States

Site Status

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Pasadena, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Wheat Ridge, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Bridgeport, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Altamonte Springs, Florida, United States

Site Status

Boynton Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Cape Coral, Florida, United States

Site Status

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

New Smyrna Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Wellington, Florida, United States

Site Status

Zephyrhills, Florida, United States

Site Status

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Newnam, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Evansville, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Lake Charles, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Metairie, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Hagerstown, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Hollywood, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Chesterfield, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Troy, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Chaska, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Mexico, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Butte, Montana, United States

Site Status

Haddon Heights, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Ocean City, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Vineland, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Voorhees Township, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Great Neck, New York, United States

Site Status

Great Neck, New York, United States

Site Status

Lake Success, New York, United States

Site Status

Pittsford, New York, United States

Site Status

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Asheville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Boone, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Fayetteville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greesnboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

High Point, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Kinston, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

New Bern, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Rutherford College, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Gallipolis, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Mentor, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Perrysburg, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Norman, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Simpsonville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Franklin, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Johnson City, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Joshson City, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Corsicana, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Laredo, Texas, United States

Site Status

Odessa, Texas, United States

Site Status

Overland Park, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Sugar Land, Texas, United States

Site Status

Bountiful, Utah, United States

Site Status

Ogden, Utah, United States

Site Status

West Valley City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Christiansburg, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Monroe, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

E3810-A001-307

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.