BMS-Reyataz Study in Treatment in Naive Subjects to Compare the Efficacy and Safety Between Boosted Reyataz and Kaletra When in Combination With Fixed Dose Truvada

NCT ID: NCT00272779

Last Updated: 2011-05-09

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1057 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-11-30

Study Completion Date

2008-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability and antiviral effects of atazanavir (ATV) plus ritonavir (RTV) versus a combination drug of lopinavir (LPV) plus RTV. A combination drug containing tenofovir (TDF) and emtricitabine (FTC) will also be taken by participants in both arms.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

HIV Infections

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Atazanavir (ATV) + Ritonovir (RTV)

Participants were administered an oral dose of ATV 300 mg and RTV 100 mg once daily along with food on a background of fixed dose combination TDF 300 mg plus FTC 200 mg (TDF/FTC) once daily. Doses of ATV and RTV were taken 24 hours apart at the same time as the background TDF/FTC, up to 96 Weeks.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ATV

Intervention Type DRUG

300mg Oral capsules for 96 weeks

RTV

Intervention Type DRUG

100mg Oral Capsules for 96 weeks

Tenofovi-Emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

One tablet with 300 mg - 200 mg once a day for 96 weeks.

Lopinavir (LPV) + RTV

Participants were administered an oral dose of LPV 400 mg and RTV 100 mg once daily along with food on a background of fixed dose combination TDF 300 mg plus FTC 200 mg (TDF/FTC) once daily. Doses of LPV and RTV were taken 24 hours apart at the same time as the background TDF/FTC, up to 96 Weeks.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

RTV

Intervention Type DRUG

100mg Oral Capsules for 96 weeks

Tenofovi-Emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

One tablet with 300 mg - 200 mg once a day for 96 weeks.

LPV

Intervention Type DRUG

400 mg (3 133mg capsules) BID for 96 weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ATV

300mg Oral capsules for 96 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

RTV

100mg Oral Capsules for 96 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Tenofovi-Emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) tablet

One tablet with 300 mg - 200 mg once a day for 96 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

LPV

400 mg (3 133mg capsules) BID for 96 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Atazanavir Reyataz BMS-232632

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* HIV RNA ≥5000 c/ml

Exclusion Criteria

* Any antiretroviral therapy within 30 days prior to screening;
* Women of Childbearing potential (WOCBP) unwilling or unable to use an acceptable method to avoid pregnancy for the entire study and for up to 8 weeks after the study;
* WOCBP using a prohibited contraceptive method
* WOCBP who are pregnant or breastfeeding;
* Women with a positive pregnancy test on enrollment or prior to study drug administration;
* Presence of a newly diagnosed HIV-Related opportunistic infection or any medical condition requiring acute therapy at the time of enrollment;
* Suspected primary (acute) HIV infection;
* Prior antiviral therapy (\>30 days of NRTI and/or \>7 days of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) or PI therapies) or any antiretroviral therapy within 30 days prior to screening; some exceptions are allowed for ARV therapy in use for Mother-to-child transmission;
* Participants with Cushing's syndrome;
* Untreated hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism. A participant who is euthyroid on a stable replacement dose of thyroid hormone is acceptable provided the thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) performed within 30 days of screening is within normal drug range;
* Recent therapy with agents with significant systemic myelosuppressive, neurotoxic, pancreatotoxic, hepatotoxic or cytotoxic potential within 3 months of study start or expected need for such therapy at the time of enrollment; or therapy with methadone or ribavirin/interferons or treatment with neurotoxic drugs or drugs that affect CYP3A4;
* Participants with obstructive liver disease;
* Active alcohol or substance use sufficient, in the Investigator's opinion, to prevent adequate compliance with study therapy or to increase the risk of developing pancreatitis or chemical hepatitis;
* Proven or suspected acute hepatitis in the 30 days prior to study entry;
* Intractable diarrhea (≥6 loose stools/day for at least 7 consecutive days) within 30 days prior to study entry;
* Inability to swallow capsules;
* Active peripheral neuropathy;
* Presence of cardiomyopathy (due to any cause) or any significant cardiovascular disease, such as unstable ischemic heart disease;
* Known, clinically significant cardiac conduction system disease.
* Baseline laboratory values measured within 2 weeks prior to initiating study drugs as follows:

1. calculated creatine clearance \<60 mL/min as estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault equation;
2. total serum lipase ≥ 1.4 times the upper limit of normal;
3. liver enzymes (AST, ALT) ≥ 5 times the upper limit of normal;
4. total serum bilirubin ≥ 1.5 times the upper limit of normal.
* Hypersensitivity to any component of the formulation of study drug;
* Prohibited therapies;
* Any other clinical conditions or prior therapy that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would make the participant unsuitable for study or unable to comply with the dosing requirements;
* Prisoners or participants who are compulsorily detained (involuntarily incarcerated) for treatment of either a psychiatric or physical (e.g., infectious disease) illness must not be enrolled into this study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Local Institution

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Laguna Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Huntersville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Capital Federal, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Rosario, Santa Fe Province, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Córdoba, , Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Carlton, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

South Yarra, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Local Institution

Bruges, , Belgium

Site Status

Local Institution

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Local Institution

Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil

Site Status

Local Institution

Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil

Site Status

Local Institution

Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Local Institution

Rio de Janeiro, , Brazil

Site Status

Local Institution

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Local Institution

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Viña del Mar, Región de Valparaíso, Chile

Site Status

Local Institution

Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile

Site Status

Local Institution

Bogotá, , Colombia

Site Status

Local Institution

San José, , Costa Rica

Site Status

Local Institution

Santo Domingo, , Dominican Republic

Site Status

Local Institution

Nice, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Paris, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Villejuif, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Bonn, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Guatemala City, , Guatemala

Site Status

Local Institution

Kowloon, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Local Institution

Jakarta, , Indonesia

Site Status

Local Institution

Genova, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Torino, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

Zapopal, Jalisco, Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

Chihuaha, , Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

Durango, , Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

San Luis Potisi, , Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

Maastricht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Local Institution

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Local Institution

Panama City, , Panama

Site Status

Local Institution

Lima, , Peru

Site Status

Local Institution

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Local Institution

Ponce, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Local Institution

San Juan, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Local Institution

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Local Institution

Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape, South Africa

Site Status

Local Institution

Bloemfontein, Free State, South Africa

Site Status

Local Institution

Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa

Site Status

Local Institution

Meadowdale, Gauteng, South Africa

Site Status

Local Institution

Westdene, Gauteng, South Africa

Site Status

Local Institution

Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Site Status

Local Institution

Mowbray, Western Cape, South Africa

Site Status

Local Institution

Parow, Western Cape, South Africa

Site Status

Local Institution

Rugby, Western Cape, South Africa

Site Status

Local Institution

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Córdoba, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Málaga, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Local Institution

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Local Institution

Chiang Mai, , Thailand

Site Status

Local Institution

Khonkaen, , Thailand

Site Status

Local Institution

London, Greater London, United Kingdom

Site Status

Local Institution

Manchester, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Austria Belgium Brazil Canada Chile Colombia Costa Rica Dominican Republic France Germany Guatemala Hong Kong Indonesia Italy Mexico Netherlands Panama Peru Portugal Puerto Rico Singapore South Africa Spain Taiwan Thailand United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Molina JM, Andrade-Villanueva J, Echevarria J, Chetchotisakd P, Corral J, David N, Moyle G, Mancini M, Percival L, Yang R, Wirtz V, Lataillade M, Absalon J, McGrath D; CASTLE Study Team. Once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir compared with twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir, each in combination with tenofovir and emtricitabine, for management of antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients: 96-week efficacy and safety results of the CASTLE study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010 Mar;53(3):323-32. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181c990bf.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20032785 (View on PubMed)

Molina JM, Andrade-Villanueva J, Echevarria J, Chetchotisakd P, Corral J, David N, Moyle G, Mancini M, Percival L, Yang R, Thiry A, McGrath D; CASTLE Study Team. Once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir versus twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir, each in combination with tenofovir and emtricitabine, for management of antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients: 48 week efficacy and safety results of the CASTLE study. Lancet. 2008 Aug 23;372(9639):646-55. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61081-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18722869 (View on PubMed)

Zhu L, Liao S, Child M, Zhang J, Persson A, Sevinsky H, Eley T, Xu X, Krystal M, Farajallah A, McGrath D, Molina JM, Bertz R. Pharmacokinetics and inhibitory quotient of atazanavir/ritonavir versus lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-infected, treatment-naive patients who participated in the CASTLE Study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Feb;67(2):465-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr490. Epub 2011 Nov 25.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22121190 (View on PubMed)

Uy J, Yang R, Wirtz V, Sheppard L, Farajallah A, McGrath D. Treatment of advanced HIV disease in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients receiving once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir or twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir, each in combination with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine. AIDS Care. 2011 Nov;23(11):1500-4. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2011.565033. Epub 2011 Jul 7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21732894 (View on PubMed)

Squires KE, Johnson M, Yang R, Uy J, Sheppard L, Absalon J, McGrath D. Comparative gender analysis of the efficacy and safety of atazanavir/ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir at 96 weeks in the CASTLE study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Feb;66(2):363-70. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq457. Epub 2010 Dec 9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21148235 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AI424-138

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Phase IIB Pilot of Atazanavir + Raltegravir
NCT00768989 TERMINATED PHASE2