BMS-Reyataz Study in Treatment in Naive Subjects to Compare the Efficacy and Safety Between Boosted Reyataz and Kaletra When in Combination With Fixed Dose Truvada
NCT ID: NCT00272779
Last Updated: 2011-05-09
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
1057 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-11-30
2008-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Atazanavir (BMS-232632) in Combination With Ritonavir or Saquinavir, and Lopinavir/Ritonavir, Each With Tenofovir and a Nucleoside in Subjects With HIV
NCT00035932
Open-Label Study Comparing Efficacy and Safety of ATV/RTV+3TC With ATV/RTV+TDF/FTC in HIV-Infected, Treatment Naïve Subjects, Followed by Treatment With ATV/RTV+3TC
NCT01620944
Study to Evaluate a HIV Drug for the Treatment of HIV Infection
NCT01803074
Safety and Efficacy of Switching to a FDC of B/F/TAF From E/C/F/TAF, E/C/F/TDF, or ATV+RTV+FTC/TDF in Virologically Suppressed HIV-1 Infected Women
NCT02652624
Safety and Efficacy of E/C/F/TDF Versus RTV-Boosted ATV Plus FTC/TDF in HIV-1 Infected, Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive Women
NCT01705574
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Atazanavir (ATV) + Ritonovir (RTV)
Participants were administered an oral dose of ATV 300 mg and RTV 100 mg once daily along with food on a background of fixed dose combination TDF 300 mg plus FTC 200 mg (TDF/FTC) once daily. Doses of ATV and RTV were taken 24 hours apart at the same time as the background TDF/FTC, up to 96 Weeks.
ATV
300mg Oral capsules for 96 weeks
RTV
100mg Oral Capsules for 96 weeks
Tenofovi-Emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) tablet
One tablet with 300 mg - 200 mg once a day for 96 weeks.
Lopinavir (LPV) + RTV
Participants were administered an oral dose of LPV 400 mg and RTV 100 mg once daily along with food on a background of fixed dose combination TDF 300 mg plus FTC 200 mg (TDF/FTC) once daily. Doses of LPV and RTV were taken 24 hours apart at the same time as the background TDF/FTC, up to 96 Weeks.
RTV
100mg Oral Capsules for 96 weeks
Tenofovi-Emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) tablet
One tablet with 300 mg - 200 mg once a day for 96 weeks.
LPV
400 mg (3 133mg capsules) BID for 96 weeks
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ATV
300mg Oral capsules for 96 weeks
RTV
100mg Oral Capsules for 96 weeks
Tenofovi-Emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) tablet
One tablet with 300 mg - 200 mg once a day for 96 weeks.
LPV
400 mg (3 133mg capsules) BID for 96 weeks
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Women of Childbearing potential (WOCBP) unwilling or unable to use an acceptable method to avoid pregnancy for the entire study and for up to 8 weeks after the study;
* WOCBP using a prohibited contraceptive method
* WOCBP who are pregnant or breastfeeding;
* Women with a positive pregnancy test on enrollment or prior to study drug administration;
* Presence of a newly diagnosed HIV-Related opportunistic infection or any medical condition requiring acute therapy at the time of enrollment;
* Suspected primary (acute) HIV infection;
* Prior antiviral therapy (\>30 days of NRTI and/or \>7 days of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) or PI therapies) or any antiretroviral therapy within 30 days prior to screening; some exceptions are allowed for ARV therapy in use for Mother-to-child transmission;
* Participants with Cushing's syndrome;
* Untreated hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism. A participant who is euthyroid on a stable replacement dose of thyroid hormone is acceptable provided the thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) performed within 30 days of screening is within normal drug range;
* Recent therapy with agents with significant systemic myelosuppressive, neurotoxic, pancreatotoxic, hepatotoxic or cytotoxic potential within 3 months of study start or expected need for such therapy at the time of enrollment; or therapy with methadone or ribavirin/interferons or treatment with neurotoxic drugs or drugs that affect CYP3A4;
* Participants with obstructive liver disease;
* Active alcohol or substance use sufficient, in the Investigator's opinion, to prevent adequate compliance with study therapy or to increase the risk of developing pancreatitis or chemical hepatitis;
* Proven or suspected acute hepatitis in the 30 days prior to study entry;
* Intractable diarrhea (≥6 loose stools/day for at least 7 consecutive days) within 30 days prior to study entry;
* Inability to swallow capsules;
* Active peripheral neuropathy;
* Presence of cardiomyopathy (due to any cause) or any significant cardiovascular disease, such as unstable ischemic heart disease;
* Known, clinically significant cardiac conduction system disease.
* Baseline laboratory values measured within 2 weeks prior to initiating study drugs as follows:
1. calculated creatine clearance \<60 mL/min as estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault equation;
2. total serum lipase ≥ 1.4 times the upper limit of normal;
3. liver enzymes (AST, ALT) ≥ 5 times the upper limit of normal;
4. total serum bilirubin ≥ 1.5 times the upper limit of normal.
* Hypersensitivity to any component of the formulation of study drug;
* Prohibited therapies;
* Any other clinical conditions or prior therapy that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would make the participant unsuitable for study or unable to comply with the dosing requirements;
* Prisoners or participants who are compulsorily detained (involuntarily incarcerated) for treatment of either a psychiatric or physical (e.g., infectious disease) illness must not be enrolled into this study.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Bristol-Myers Squibb
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Local Institution
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Local Institution
Laguna Beach, California, United States
Local Institution
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Local Institution
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States
Local Institution
Orlando, Florida, United States
Local Institution
Huntersville, North Carolina, United States
Local Institution
Dallas, Texas, United States
Local Institution
Fort Worth, Texas, United States
Local Institution
Capital Federal, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Local Institution
Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Local Institution
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, Argentina
Local Institution
Buenos Aires, , Argentina
Local Institution
Córdoba, , Argentina
Local Institution
Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
Local Institution
Carlton, Victoria, Australia
Local Institution
South Yarra, Victoria, Australia
Local Institution
Vienna, , Austria
Local Institution
Bruges, , Belgium
Local Institution
Ghent, , Belgium
Local Institution
Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
Local Institution
Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil
Local Institution
Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
Local Institution
Rio de Janeiro, , Brazil
Local Institution
São Paulo, , Brazil
Local Institution
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Local Institution
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Local Institution
Viña del Mar, Región de Valparaíso, Chile
Local Institution
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile
Local Institution
Bogotá, , Colombia
Local Institution
San José, , Costa Rica
Local Institution
Santo Domingo, , Dominican Republic
Local Institution
Nice, , France
Local Institution
Paris, , France
Local Institution
Villejuif, , France
Local Institution
Berlin, , Germany
Local Institution
Bonn, , Germany
Local Institution
Cologne, , Germany
Local Institution
Hamburg, , Germany
Local Institution
Guatemala City, , Guatemala
Local Institution
Kowloon, , Hong Kong
Local Institution
Jakarta, , Indonesia
Local Institution
Genova, , Italy
Local Institution
Milan, , Italy
Local Institution
Roma, , Italy
Local Institution
Torino, , Italy
Local Institution
Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
Local Institution
Zapopal, Jalisco, Mexico
Local Institution
Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico
Local Institution
Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico
Local Institution
Chihuaha, , Mexico
Local Institution
Durango, , Mexico
Local Institution
San Luis Potisi, , Mexico
Local Institution
Maastricht, , Netherlands
Local Institution
Utrecht, , Netherlands
Local Institution
Panama City, , Panama
Local Institution
Lima, , Peru
Local Institution
Lisbon, , Portugal
Local Institution
Ponce, , Puerto Rico
Local Institution
San Juan, , Puerto Rico
Local Institution
Singapore, , Singapore
Local Institution
Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape, South Africa
Local Institution
Bloemfontein, Free State, South Africa
Local Institution
Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
Local Institution
Meadowdale, Gauteng, South Africa
Local Institution
Westdene, Gauteng, South Africa
Local Institution
Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Local Institution
Mowbray, Western Cape, South Africa
Local Institution
Parow, Western Cape, South Africa
Local Institution
Rugby, Western Cape, South Africa
Local Institution
Barcelona, , Spain
Local Institution
Córdoba, , Spain
Local Institution
Madrid, , Spain
Local Institution
Málaga, , Spain
Local Institution
Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan
Local Institution
Taipei, , Taiwan
Local Institution
Chiang Mai, , Thailand
Local Institution
Khonkaen, , Thailand
Local Institution
London, Greater London, United Kingdom
Local Institution
Manchester, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Molina JM, Andrade-Villanueva J, Echevarria J, Chetchotisakd P, Corral J, David N, Moyle G, Mancini M, Percival L, Yang R, Wirtz V, Lataillade M, Absalon J, McGrath D; CASTLE Study Team. Once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir compared with twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir, each in combination with tenofovir and emtricitabine, for management of antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients: 96-week efficacy and safety results of the CASTLE study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010 Mar;53(3):323-32. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181c990bf.
Molina JM, Andrade-Villanueva J, Echevarria J, Chetchotisakd P, Corral J, David N, Moyle G, Mancini M, Percival L, Yang R, Thiry A, McGrath D; CASTLE Study Team. Once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir versus twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir, each in combination with tenofovir and emtricitabine, for management of antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients: 48 week efficacy and safety results of the CASTLE study. Lancet. 2008 Aug 23;372(9639):646-55. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61081-8.
Zhu L, Liao S, Child M, Zhang J, Persson A, Sevinsky H, Eley T, Xu X, Krystal M, Farajallah A, McGrath D, Molina JM, Bertz R. Pharmacokinetics and inhibitory quotient of atazanavir/ritonavir versus lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-infected, treatment-naive patients who participated in the CASTLE Study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Feb;67(2):465-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr490. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
Uy J, Yang R, Wirtz V, Sheppard L, Farajallah A, McGrath D. Treatment of advanced HIV disease in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients receiving once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir or twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir, each in combination with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine. AIDS Care. 2011 Nov;23(11):1500-4. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2011.565033. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
Squires KE, Johnson M, Yang R, Uy J, Sheppard L, Absalon J, McGrath D. Comparative gender analysis of the efficacy and safety of atazanavir/ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir at 96 weeks in the CASTLE study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Feb;66(2):363-70. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq457. Epub 2010 Dec 9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AI424-138
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.