TMC114-C214: Trial of TMC114 Administered With Low Dose Ritonavir (RTV) in HIV-1 Infected Treatment Experienced Patients

NCT ID: NCT00110877

Last Updated: 2015-07-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

604 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-04-30

Study Completion Date

2011-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Study TMC114-C214 is a randomized, controlled, open-label trial to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of TMC114 boosted with low dose ritonavir (RTV) versus Kaletra (LPV)/RTV in lopinavir-naïve treatment-experienced HIV-1 infected patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Study TMC114-C214 is a randomized (patients are assigned to different treatment groups based on chance), controlled, open-label trial to compare the efficacy (effectiveness), safety and tolerability of TMC114 boosted with low dose ritonavir (RTV) versus Kaletra (LPV)/RTV in treatment-experienced HIV-1 infected patients. This research study will look at the safety of TMC114 and effectiveness in reducing the amount of HIV(viral load) in the blood. People included in this study will have received either Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NNRTIs) or Protease Inhibitors (PIs) or both. The duration of the study will be approximately 106 weeks, which includes a 4 to 6 week screening period, 96-week treatment period, and 4-week follow-up period. TMC114 300mg are orange tablets where 2 tablets are taken by mouth twice a day with 1 tablet of Ritonavir. Kaletra (LPV/RTV) is either a tablet or capsule taken twice a day. The oral capsule contains 133.3 mg LPV, 33.3 mg RTV and the film-coated tablet is available for oral administration in a strength of 200 mg of lopinavir and 50 mg of ritonavir. Dosing for all medication will occur for 96 weeks and you will be randomly assigned to either TMC114 or Kaletra.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

HIV Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

002

LPV/rtv One 400mg LPV tablet twice daily with 100mg RTV

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

LPV/rtv

Intervention Type DRUG

One 400mg LPV tablet twice daily with 100mg RTV

001

TMC114/rtv Two 300mg TMC114 tablets twice daily with 100mg RTV

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

TMC114/rtv

Intervention Type DRUG

Two 300mg TMC114 tablets twice daily with 100mg RTV

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

LPV/rtv

One 400mg LPV tablet twice daily with 100mg RTV

Intervention Type DRUG

TMC114/rtv

Two 300mg TMC114 tablets twice daily with 100mg RTV

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient has documented HIV-1 infection
* Treatment with an Antiretroviral regimen (containing at least 2 NRTIs in combination with at least 1 NNRTI and/or 1 PI) for at least 12 weeks
* Plasma HIV-1 RNA \>1000 copies/mL
* General medical condition does not interfere with the assessments and the completion of the trial

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients for whom an investigational Antiretroviral is part of the current regimen, with the following exceptions if applicable (depending on local regulatory approval)
* tenofovir, emtricitabine, atazanavir, fosamprenavir
* Previous or current use of lopinavir, enfuvirtide (T-20), tipranavir and TMC114
* Life expectancy of less than 6 months
* Pregnant or breast-feeding
* Females of childbearing potential not willing to use effective non-hormonal birth control methods or not willing to continue practicing these birth control methods for at least 14 days after the end of the treatment period
* Patients with significantly decreased liver function or decompensation, irrespective of liver enzyme levels
* Participation in other investigational trials without prior approval of the sponsor
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tibotec Pharmaceuticals, Ireland

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tibotec Pharmaceuticals Clinical Trial

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Tibotec Pharmaceutical Limited

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

West Hollywood, California, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Safety Harbor, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Vero Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Macon, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Berkley, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Camden, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

East Orange, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Newark, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Huntersville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Galveston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Longview, Texas, United States

Site Status

Hampton, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Córdoba, , Argentina

Site Status

Rosario, , Argentina

Site Status

Darlinghurst, , Australia

Site Status

Melbourne, , Australia

Site Status

Perth, , Australia

Site Status

Surry Hills, , Australia

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Curitiba, , Brazil

Site Status

Distrito Barao Geraldo-Campina, , Brazil

Site Status

Nova Iguaçu, , Brazil

Site Status

Pinheiros, , Brazil

Site Status

Rio de Janeiro, , Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Providencia, , Chile

Site Status

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status

Aalborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Nice, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Villejuif, , France

Site Status

Aachen, , Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

Düsseldorf, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Mannheim, , Germany

Site Status

Osnabrück, , Germany

Site Status

Stuttgart, , Germany

Site Status

Melissia-Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Guatemala City, , Guatemala

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Kuala Lumpur, , Malaysia

Site Status

Sungai Buloh, , Malaysia

Site Status

Guadalajara, , Mexico

Site Status

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Panama City, , Panama

Site Status

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

San Juan, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Kazan', , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Nizhny Novgorod, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Volgograd, , Russia

Site Status

Cape Town, , South Africa

Site Status

Durban, , South Africa

Site Status

Houghton, Johannesburg, , South Africa

Site Status

Johannesburg, , South Africa

Site Status

Pretoria, , South Africa

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Khon Kaen, , Thailand

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Austria Belgium Brazil Canada Chile Denmark France Germany Greece Guatemala Hungary Malaysia Mexico Netherlands Panama Portugal Puerto Rico Russia South Africa Spain Switzerland Thailand United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Madruga JV, Berger D, McMurchie M, Suter F, Banhegyi D, Ruxrungtham K, Norris D, Lefebvre E, de Bethune MP, Tomaka F, De Pauw M, Vangeneugden T, Spinosa-Guzman S; TITAN study group. Efficacy and safety of darunavir-ritonavir compared with that of lopinavir-ritonavir at 48 weeks in treatment-experienced, HIV-infected patients in TITAN: a randomised controlled phase III trial. Lancet. 2007 Jul 7;370(9581):49-58. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61049-6.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17617272 (View on PubMed)

Banhegyi D, Katlama C, da Cunha CA, Schneider S, Rachlis A, Workman C, De Meyer S, Vandevoorde A, Van De Casteele T, Tomaka F. Week 96 efficacy, virology and safety of darunavir/r versus lopinavir/r in treatment-experienced patients in TITAN. Curr HIV Res. 2012 Mar;10(2):171-81. doi: 10.2174/157016212799937218.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22339125 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TMC114-C214

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR002794

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

NCT00980902

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: nct_alias

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.