Patient Controlled Oral Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Management After Total Knee Replacement

NCT ID: NCT00221936

Last Updated: 2008-12-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-07-31

Study Completion Date

2005-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patient Centered Care (PCC) is "an approach that consciously adopts the patient's perspective...about what matters" (Gerteis, Edgeman, Levitan, Walker, Stokes, Cleary, Delbanco, 1993). Experiencing pain is the most common concern of patients before surgery - even ahead of whether the surgery would improve their condition (Apfelbaum, 2003). Current standard of practice for post-operative pain management in most acute care hospitals today is intravenous patient controlled analgesia (IV PCA). However, despite the fact that patients prefer IV PCA because it affords them greater control and provides them with better pain relief (Ballantyne, Carr, deFerranti, Suarez, Lau, Chalmers, Angelillo, Mosteller, 1998 ; Rawal, 2001), hospitals routinely take control of pain medications away from patients once they are switched to pain tablets. Patients must then wait, in pain, for their nurse to bring them pain tablets.

Patient controlled oral analgesia (PCOA) has been utilitzed in several centers in the US and Germany. Preliminary evidence from the literature seems to indicate that the benefits of PCOA are similar to IV PCA including increased patient satisfaction and better pain control (Striebel, Romer, Kopf, Schwagmeier ,1996; Striebel, Scheitza, Philippi, Behrens, Toussaint, 1998). At the Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, we have successfully implemented a PCOA program on two surgical units (Orthopedics/Rheumatology and Spinal). The purpose of this study is to compare usual nurse administered oral analgesia to PCOA with respect to pain, patient satisfaction, and passive range of knee motion in postoperative total knee replacement patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Self-Administered Versus Nurse Administered Pain Medication.

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Self-administration or nurse administered medication

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* able to read and write English
* post elective total knee replacement surgery (primary or revision)
* already on IV PCA
* age 18-80
* able to tolerate oral medication
* able to physically open a childproof vial independently (including the absence of any significant problems with manual power, dexterity or visual acuity)
* able and willing to complete Oral PCA flowsheet

Exclusion Criteria

* history of substance abuse
* history of sleep apnea
* episode(s) of confusion, disorientation during this admission
* episode(s) of respiratory depression during this admission
* history of major psychiatric disorder pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Health Network, Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

University Health Network

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Patti Kastanias, RN, MSc(A), ACNP

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Health Network, Toronto

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Toronto Western Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

University Health Network

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Universtiy Health Network

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UHN04-0394-AE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id