Opioid-Sparing Protocol Comparing With Opioid-based Protocol After Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty

NCT ID: NCT04314505

Last Updated: 2020-07-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

56 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-03-20

Study Completion Date

2020-08-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The concern for the opioid use in the total knee arthroplasty continues to rise in recent decades. Historically, the total knee arthroplasty consumed high doses opioids in the postoperative periods. Compared to the Opioid-Based patient controlled analgesia(PCA), the opioid-sparing protocol may have benefits to decrease the concerns of the opioid use and opioid-related complication and provides the equivalent efficacy for pain control. The purpose of this trial in to provide a novel opioid-sparing protocol (OSP) to evaluate the efficacy for pain control and reducing the immediate postoperative opioid consumption.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Knee Replacement Postoperative Pain Opioid Use

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Opioid Sparing Protocol

Preemptive(before incision): Parecoxib sodium 40 mg Postoperative: Parecoxib sodium 40 mg was given intravenously every 12 hours for 4 more doses.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Opioid-Sparing Protocol

Intervention Type DRUG

After a general anesthesia procedure was performed, an experienced anesthesiologist performed ultrasound guided adductor canal block procedures on both knees. In the opioid-sparing group, a dose of Parecoxib sodium 40 mg was administrated through intravenous route before the incision. After the surgery, Parecoxib sodium 40 mg was given intravenously every 12 hours for 4 more doses. Before the wound closure, the periarticular injection (each side 10 ml of 0.25% Bupivacaine) was done. The total dosage would be recorded in the device. All patients received oral paracetamol 500mg, 4 times a day and oral celecoxib 200mg, 2 times a day after surgery.

Opioid Based Patient Controlled Analgesia

Preemptive(before incision) and Postoperative: the initial setting was 0.01mg/kg\*hour, patient-controlled dose 2 mg, lock-out 5 minutes and limited 40mg in each 4 hours; adjusted by the PCA staff

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Opioid-Based Patient Controlled Analgesia

Intervention Type DRUG

After a general anesthesia procedure was performed, an experienced anesthesiologist performed ultrasound guided adductor canal block procedures on both knees. The patient was informed that the intravenous bolus of rescue morphine (4mg) was available every 4 hours if the pain was intolerable. In the PCA group, the device was applied before incision and the initial setting was 0.01mg/kg\*hour, patient-controlled dose 2 mg, lock-out 5 minutes and limited 40mg in each 4 hours. After the surgery, the staff of PCA group would visit the patients and adjusted the dosage. The PCA was removed after 72 hours from the surgery. Before the wound closure, the periarticular injection (each side 10 ml of 0.25% Bupivacaine) was done. The total dosage would be recorded in the device. All patients received oral paracetamol 500mg, 4 times a day and oral celecoxib 200mg, 2 times a day after surgery.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Opioid-Sparing Protocol

After a general anesthesia procedure was performed, an experienced anesthesiologist performed ultrasound guided adductor canal block procedures on both knees. In the opioid-sparing group, a dose of Parecoxib sodium 40 mg was administrated through intravenous route before the incision. After the surgery, Parecoxib sodium 40 mg was given intravenously every 12 hours for 4 more doses. Before the wound closure, the periarticular injection (each side 10 ml of 0.25% Bupivacaine) was done. The total dosage would be recorded in the device. All patients received oral paracetamol 500mg, 4 times a day and oral celecoxib 200mg, 2 times a day after surgery.

Intervention Type DRUG

Opioid-Based Patient Controlled Analgesia

After a general anesthesia procedure was performed, an experienced anesthesiologist performed ultrasound guided adductor canal block procedures on both knees. The patient was informed that the intravenous bolus of rescue morphine (4mg) was available every 4 hours if the pain was intolerable. In the PCA group, the device was applied before incision and the initial setting was 0.01mg/kg\*hour, patient-controlled dose 2 mg, lock-out 5 minutes and limited 40mg in each 4 hours. After the surgery, the staff of PCA group would visit the patients and adjusted the dosage. The PCA was removed after 72 hours from the surgery. Before the wound closure, the periarticular injection (each side 10 ml of 0.25% Bupivacaine) was done. The total dosage would be recorded in the device. All patients received oral paracetamol 500mg, 4 times a day and oral celecoxib 200mg, 2 times a day after surgery.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

OSP Protocol PCA Protocol

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patient with bilateral advanced knee osteoarthritis undergoing simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty surgery
* willing to participate in this study and randomly allocated to either opioid-sparing protocol or PCA protocol.

Exclusion Criteria

* patient who refused to participate or with contraindication or hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs
* chronic pain disorder (exceeding 50 mg oral morphine equivalence per day at time of recruitment)
* substance abuse (e.g. alcoholism)
* severe renal impairment.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Shang-Wen Tsai, M.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dep. of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital

Taipei City, Taipei, Taiwan

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Hsuan-Hsiao Ma, M.D.

Role: CONTACT

02-28717557

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Shang-Wen Tsai, Dr.

Role: primary

+886-2-28717557

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2020-02-008C

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

NSAIDS vs Opioids in Tibial Fractures
NCT05332314 UNKNOWN PHASE4