The Twin Birth Study: A Trial Comparing Planned Vaginal Birth to Elective Caesarean Section of Twins
NCT ID: NCT00187369
Last Updated: 2020-05-13
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
2804 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2003-12-31
2011-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Neonatal Outcomes in Twin Pregnancies
NCT05104255
Outcomes of Cesarean Section vs Vaginal Delivery: Instrumental Variable Adjusted Analysis
NCT02866058
Bilateral Uterine Artery Ligation During the Cesarean Delivery of Twins
NCT04518176
Prophylactic Methylergonovine for Twin Cesarean
NCT05772156
The Effect of Birth Plans on Obstetrical Outcomes
NCT02526459
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Caesarean Section
delivery by CS
Method of Delivery
CS or VB
Vaginal Birth
delivery by VB
Method of Delivery
CS or VB
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Method of Delivery
CS or VB
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Estimated fetal weight of each fetus 1500 - 4000 g
3. Both twins alive at time of randomization
4. Twin A is in cephalic position
Exclusion Criteria
2. Lethal fetal anomaly of either fetus
3. Contraindication to labour or vaginal delivery for either twin
4. Previous participation in the Twin Birth Study
15 Years
45 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
OTHER_GOV
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr Jon Barrett
Chief, Maternal-Fetal Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jon F Barrett
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
SHSC
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Data Coordinating Centre/SHSC
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Barrett JF, Hannah ME, Hutton EK, Willan AR, Allen AC, Armson BA, Gafni A, Joseph KS, Mason D, Ohlsson A, Ross S, Sanchez JJ, Asztalos EV; Twin Birth Study Collaborative Group. A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 3;369(14):1295-305. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214939.
Hochler H, Tevet A, Barg M, Suissa-Cohen Y, Lipschuetz M, Yagel S, Aviram A, Mei-Dan E, Melamed N, Barrett JFR, Fox NS, Walfisch A. Trial of labor of vertex-nonvertex twins following a previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 Jul;4(4):100640. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100640. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
Dougan C, Gotha L, Melamed N, Aviram A, Asztalos EV, Anabusi S, Willan AR, Barrett J, Mei-Dan E. Cesarean delivery or induction of labor in pre-labor twin gestations: a secondary analysis of the twin birth study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Nov 17;20(1):702. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03369-x.
Aviram A, Lipworth H, Asztalos EV, Mei-Dan E, Melamed N, Cao X, Zaltz A, Hvidman L, Barrett JFR. Delivery of monochorionic twins: lessons learned from the Twin Birth Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Dec;223(6):916.e1-916.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.06.048. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
Aviram A, Lipworth H, Asztalos EV, Mei-Dan E, Cao X, Melamed N, Zaltz A, Anastasio HB, Berghella V, Barrett JFR. The worst of both worlds-combined deliveries in twin gestations: a subanalysis of the Twin Birth Study, a randomized, controlled, prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;221(4):353.e1-353.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.047. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
Mei-Dan E, Asztalos EV, Willan AR, Barrett JF. The effect of induction method in twin pregnancies: a secondary analysis for the twin birth study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jan 6;17(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1201-8.
Melamed N, Wong J, Asztalos E, Rosen H, Okby R, Barrett J. The Likelihood of Change in Fetal Presentation During the Third Trimester in Twin Pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;126(6):1231-1236. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001128.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ISRCTN74420086
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
MCT-63164
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.