Success of External Cephalic Version Study

NCT ID: NCT03106753

Last Updated: 2020-10-09

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

34 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-04-12

Study Completion Date

2018-05-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine the best way to optimize the success of external cephalic version (turning the baby from the outside). Attempting to turn babies in-utero is recommended because it may decrease the risk of needing a cesarean section for abnormal presentation. While the study team knows that this procedure can be effective, the study team still has some un-answered questions as to the best way to perform this procedure to increase the chance of success. Many prior studies have shown that using spinal anesthesia (a shot of medication placed in your back to numb and relax the abdomen) can increase the success rate of a version. This ultimately has led to the finding that using this anesthesia can decrease the rate of cesarean section. However, there have been only a small number of studies assessing the success rate if spinal anesthesia is used only in the event that without it fails. Therefore the study team is going to compare patients who receive spinal anesthesia with those who only receive spinal anesthesia if the procedure to turn the baby (ECV) fails without it.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Breech presentation occurs in approximately 3-4% of term pregnancies and leads to one of the most common indications for cesarean delivery. Attempting an external cephalic version (ECV) significantly increases the chance of cephalic presentation at time of delivery and reduces the chance of cesarean section. Since ECV does in fact reduce the rate of cesarean section, many studies have sought to determine the best method to perform the procedure to optimize the chance of success. A recent meta-analysis concluded that administration of neuraxial analgesia significantly increases the success rate of ECV and also increases the incidence of vaginal delivery. However, there have been only 2 prospective studies and no randomized trials that evaluated the success of ECV using neuraxial analgesia only when initial attempt without it has failed. Therefore, the study team designed a randomized controlled trial with two groups: Group 1- patients receiving spinal anesthesia immediately versus Group 2- patients attempting ECV without spinal anesthesia with reattempt using a spinal if first attempt fails. This study will be conducted on labor and delivery at Mount Sinai West hospital. Patients who present to labor and delivery at term for ECV will be approached for enrollment and those who consent to be part of the study would be randomized into a group. ECV will then be attempted and delivery and neonatal outcomes will be collected. Patients will likely be enrolled in the study from time of version (approximately 37 weeks) until postpartum. This study will take approximately 1-2 years given the ECV rate.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

External Cephalic Version

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Spinal anesthesia immediately for ECV.

The patient will have a spinal administered by the on call anesthesiologist using standard protocol (intrathecal bupivacaine 7.5 mg). The patient will then be administered 0.25 mg Terbutaline subcutaneously and the ECV will be attempted. Under ultrasound guidance the provider will attempt to lift the breech upward from the pelvis with one hand and guide the head with the other hand to produce a forward roll. If forward roll fails, a backward roll somersault may be attempted. ECV attempt will be abandoned if there is significant fetal bradycardia, discomfort to the patient, or if the procedure cannot be completed easily with these maneuvers. Once attempt is complete, whether successful or not, the patient will be monitored for a minimum of 30 minutes, and will be discharged once they are able to walk, void, and tolerate PO intake, only if fetal and maternal status is reassuring.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

intrathecal bupivacaine 7.5 mg

Terbutaline

Intervention Type DRUG

0.25 mg Terbutaline subcutaneously

Spinal anesthesia if no intervention fails for ECV.

The patient will be administered terbutaline 0.25 mg subcutaneously and the version will be attempted using the same procedure as above. If successful, the patient will be monitored for 30 minutes and discharged if fetal and maternal status is reassuring. If the attempt fails, the patient will be administered spinal anesthesia as above and the same maneuvers will be attempted. Once attempt is complete, whether successful or not, the patient will be monitored for a minimum of 30 minutes, and will be discharged once they are able to walk, void, and tolerate PO intake, only if fetal and maternal status is reassuring.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

intrathecal bupivacaine 7.5 mg

Terbutaline

Intervention Type DRUG

0.25 mg Terbutaline subcutaneously

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bupivacaine

intrathecal bupivacaine 7.5 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Terbutaline

0.25 mg Terbutaline subcutaneously

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients included are those with singleton pregnancies of at least 37 weeks gestation in nonvertex presentation with no contraindication for a vaginal delivery.
* Membranes must be intact with a minimum of a 2x2 pocket and Category 1 non-stress test.

Exclusion Criteria

* All patients with a contraindication for a vaginal delivery will be excluded from the study.
* Patients with gross fetal anomalies or uterine malformations.
* Patients with contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia or allergies to any of the study medications will also be excluded.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Natalie Porat

Resident

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Natalie Porat, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mount Sinai West

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R, West HM. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 1;2015(4):CD000083. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000083.pub3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25828903 (View on PubMed)

Magro-Malosso ER, Saccone G, Di Tommaso M, Mele M, Berghella V. Neuraxial analgesia to increase the success rate of external cephalic version: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;215(3):276-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.036. Epub 2016 Apr 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27131581 (View on PubMed)

Neiger R, Hennessy MD, Patel M. Reattempting failed external cephalic version under epidural anesthesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Nov;179(5):1136-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70120-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9822489 (View on PubMed)

Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, de Spirlet M, Durand-Zaleski I, Blanie P, Fisher C, Lang AC, Nisand I. External cephalic version with epidural anaesthesia after failure of a first trial with beta-mimetics. BJOG. 2000 Mar;107(3):406-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13238.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10740339 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GCO 17-0236

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Caesarean and Corticotherapy
NCT00446953 COMPLETED PHASE4