Hyperbaric Bupivacaine Versus Hyperbaric Prilocaine 2% for Cesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia

NCT ID: NCT02973048

Last Updated: 2020-07-02

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-03-12

Study Completion Date

2018-11-08

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Over the past 15 years, cesarean delivery is most commonly performed under spinal anesthesia using hyperbaric bupivacaine which provides an adequate sensory and motor block. Despite effective surgical anesthesia, bupivacaine is associated with long duration motor block and dose-dependent maternal hypotension potentially harmful for the fetus. Prilocaine with its new 2% hyperbaric formulation (HP), developed recently, showed rapid onset of action and faster regression of motor block compared to other local anesthetics without noteworthy side-effects when used intrathecally. The aim of this randomized, multicenter, powered clinical trial is to investigate whether HP may be an efficient alternative to hyperbaric bupivacaine for scheduled caesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia, with more rapid rehabilitation and less adverse effects. Our hypothesis is that hyperbaric prilocaine offers shorter motor block and more rapid rehabilitation than bupivacaine.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pregnant Women Pain Hypotension

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Hyperbaric bupivacaine

Hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% will be administered at the dose of 10 mg intrathecally associated with 100 µg of morphine and 2.5 µg of sufentanyl.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Hyperbaric bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

The dose of 10 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine will be administered to one of two groups intrathecally and the quality of sensory and motor block as well as side-effects will be observed at precise time points.

Hyperbaric prilocaine

Hyperbaric prilocaine 2% will be administered at the dose of 50 mg intrathecally associated with 100 µg of morphine and 2.5 µg of sufentanyl.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Hyperbaric prilocaine

Intervention Type DRUG

The dose of 50 mg of hyperbaric prilocaine will be administered to one of two groups intrathecally and the quality of sensory and motor block as well as side-effects will be observed at precise time points.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Hyperbaric bupivacaine

The dose of 10 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine will be administered to one of two groups intrathecally and the quality of sensory and motor block as well as side-effects will be observed at precise time points.

Intervention Type DRUG

Hyperbaric prilocaine

The dose of 50 mg of hyperbaric prilocaine will be administered to one of two groups intrathecally and the quality of sensory and motor block as well as side-effects will be observed at precise time points.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Marcaine Tachipri

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) \< III
* Age 18-40 year
* Body Weight \<110 kg
* Height between 160 and 175 cm
* Gestational age\>37 SA
* Elective cesarean delivery
* Singleton pregnancy
* Non complicated pregnancy
* Signed informed consent obtained prior to any study specific assessments and procedures

Exclusion Criteria

* Twin pregnancy
* History of 2 cesarean section or more
* Diabetes and gestational diabetes
* Placenta praevia
* Congenital foetal abnormality
* Intrauterine growth retardation
* Patient in labour
* Membrane rupture
* Known allergy to local anaesthetics
* Standard contraindications to neuraxial block.
* Disagreement of the patient
* Neurological impairment
* Gestational low blood pressure
* Pre eclampsia and eclampsia
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Pierre

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Panayota KAPESSIDOU, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University Hospital Saint-Pierre (CHU Saint-Pierre), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB)

Philippe GOFFARD, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital Saint-Pierre (CHU Saint-Pierre), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital Saint-Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB)

Brussels, Brussels Capital, Belgium

Site Status

Clinique Ste-Anne/St-Remi

Anderlecht, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gautier P, De Kock M, Huberty L, Demir T, Izydorczic M, Vanderick B. Comparison of the effects of intrathecal ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, and bupivacaine for Caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 2003 Nov;91(5):684-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeg251.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14570791 (View on PubMed)

Guntz E, Latrech B, Tsiberidis C, Gouwy J, Kapessidou Y. ED50 and ED90 of intrathecal hyperbaric 2% prilocaine in ambulatory knee arthroscopy. Can J Anaesth. 2014 Sep;61(9):801-7. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0189-7. Epub 2014 Jun 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24906303 (View on PubMed)

Guntz E, Kapessidou Y. Spinal prilocaine for same-day surgery: the importance of equipotent doses. Can J Anaesth. 2016 Aug;63(8):985-6. doi: 10.1007/s12630-016-0645-7. Epub 2016 Apr 4. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27044397 (View on PubMed)

Goffard P, Leloup R, Vercruysse Y, Fils JF, Gautier PE, Kapessidou Y. Comparison of equipotent doses of intrathecal hyperbaric prilocaine 2% and hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% for elective caesarean section: A prospective, randomised, controlled, two-centre clinical trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2022 Mar 1;39(3):227-235. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001548.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34101713 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

B076201627677

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.