Chloroprocaine 1% Versus Ropivacaine 0,75% During Cesarean Section

NCT ID: NCT06376058

Last Updated: 2025-07-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-10

Study Completion Date

2026-01-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This will be a prospective randomized study, aiming at comparing an intrathecal fixed dose of chloroprocaine 1% versus an intrathecal fixed dose of ropivacaine 0.75% in elective cesarean sections

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Neuraxial techniques are the anesthetic techniques of choice in contemporary obstetric anesthesia practice, with a definitive superiority as compared to general anesthesia, since, by their use, serious complications involving the airway can be avoided. Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia has become the favorable technique for both elective and emergency cesarean sections. Various local anesthetics have been used, but ropivacaine is the drug of choice in most hospitals in Greece. However, chloroprocaine is a preferable local anesthetic in USA due to its quick and predictable onset of action. Chloroprocaine was initially used in 1980, but it became obsolete in those years due to neurological symptoms associated with its use caused mainly by the presence of sodium bisulfite and disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA) in the early formulations. Nowadays, new formulations of the drug without EDTA makes chloroprocaine safe for use.

The aim of the current randomized controlled trial will be to compare the effect of an intrathecal fixed dose of chloroprocaine versus an intrathecal fixed dose of ropivacaine in parturients subjected to elective cesarean section under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cesarean Section Local Anesthetic

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

chloroprocaine group

intrathecal fixed dose of chloroprocaine 1%

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Chloroprocaine 1% Injectable Solution

Intervention Type DRUG

• in parturients allocated to the chloroprocaine group, a fixed dose of chloroprocaine 1% will be administered intrathecally

ropivacaine group

intrathecal fixed dose of ropivacaine 0.75%

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ropivacaine 0.75% Injectable Solution

Intervention Type DRUG

• in parturients allocated to the ropivacaine group, a fixed dose of ropivacaine 0.75% will be administered intrathecally

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Chloroprocaine 1% Injectable Solution

• in parturients allocated to the chloroprocaine group, a fixed dose of chloroprocaine 1% will be administered intrathecally

Intervention Type DRUG

Ropivacaine 0.75% Injectable Solution

• in parturients allocated to the ropivacaine group, a fixed dose of ropivacaine 0.75% will be administered intrathecally

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* adult parturients, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II,
* singleton gestation\>37 weeks
* elective cesarean section

Exclusion Criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) \> III
* age \< 18 years
* singleton gestation \<37 weeks
* Body Mass Index (BMI) \>40 kg/m2
* Body weight \<50 kg
* Body weight\>100 kg
* height\<150 cm
* height\>180 cm
* multiple gestation
* emergency delivery
* fetal abnormality
* fetal distress
* pregnancy-induced pathology such as preeclampsia, eclampsia, premature labor, placental abnormalities
* pregnancy- induced diseases such as hepatic failure, pseudocholinesterase deficiency, neuromuscular diseases
* lack of informed consent
* contraindication for regional anesthesia such as thrombocytopenia, coagulation abnormalities, allergy to local anesthetics
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

48 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Aretaieion University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr Kassiani Theodoraki

Professor of Anesthesiology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kassiani Theodoraki, PhD, DESA

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Aretaieion University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Aretaieion University Hospital

Athens, , Greece

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Greece

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Kassiani Theodoraki, PhD, DESA

Role: CONTACT

6974634162

Marianna Mavromati, MD

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Kassiani Theodoraki, PhD, DESA

Role: primary

6974634162

Marianna Mavromati, MD

Role: backup

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Maes S, Laubach M, Poelaert J. Randomised controlled trial of spinal anaesthesia with bupivacaine or 2-chloroprocaine during caesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016 May;60(5):642-9. doi: 10.1111/aas.12665. Epub 2015 Nov 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26608876 (View on PubMed)

Saporito A, Ceppi M, Perren A, La Regina D, Cafarotti S, Borgeat A, Aguirre J, Van De Velde M, Teunkens A. Does spinal chloroprocaine pharmacokinetic profile actually translate into a clinical advantage in terms of clinical outcomes when compared to low-dose spinal bupivacaine? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2019 Feb;52:99-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30237085 (View on PubMed)

Singariya G, Choudhary K, Kamal M, Bihani P, Pahuja H, Saini P. Comparison of analgesic efficacy of intrathecal 1% 2-chloroprocaine with or without fentanyl in elective caesarean section: A prospective, double-blind, randomised study. Indian J Anaesth. 2021 Feb;65(2):102-107. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_816_20. Epub 2021 Feb 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33776083 (View on PubMed)

Baribeault T, Suss S. Spinal Anesthesia with 2-Chloroprocaine and Dexmedetomidine for Cesarean Section: A Case Report. AANA J. 2023 Jun;91(3):194-196.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37227957 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

434/06-06-2022

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.