Chloroprocaine Lavage to Improve Outcomes Related to Operative Cesarean Delivery

NCT ID: NCT03760718

Last Updated: 2024-09-19

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

EARLY_PHASE1

Total Enrollment

15 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-09-30

Study Completion Date

2021-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The long term objective is to show that intraperitoneal chloroprocaine can be used an alternative option to avoid general anesthesia during cesarean delivery, to alleviate mother's discomfort from surgical pain, reduce complications, and improve the birth experience. The objectives in this study are to determine the amount of chloroprocaine that is absorbed into the blood in order to create a plasma concentration time profile and to determine the incidence of side effects to help guide selection of an appropriate concentration for future study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Compared to general anesthesia, neuraxial anesthesia (spinals and epidurals) is associated with a lower risk for maternal aspiration and airway compromise, exposes the baby to less anesthetic, and allows for greater maternal involvement in the birth process. For these reasons, it has become the preferred method of anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Spinals that are placed to facilitate cesarean delivery have a duration of one to two hours. Currently, if that duration is exceeded patients must have general endotracheal anesthesia. In addition, suboptimal neuraxial anesthesia for cesarean delivery is not uncommon with an incidence of 2-9%, depending upon the urgency of surgery and the type of neuraxial block. Providing less than adequate anesthesia for cesarean delivery may increase the risk of legal liability. For this reason, some patients with suboptimal neuraxial anesthesia have intraoperative conversion to general endotracheal anesthesia.

The first known description of the use of intraperitoneal local anesthetic to provide anesthesia for cesarean delivery was published in 1975. In this article Ranney et al. described how to use up to 100 mL of 1% procaine to provide anesthesia for cesarean delivery under local field block alone. Some of this was injected into the skin and fascia, and the remainder was diluted to 0.5% and "spilled" into the peritoneum.

Multiple publications have shown that intraperitoneal local anesthetic can be used to treat intraoperative and postoperative pain, prevent postoperative nausea, and shorten hospital length of stay. A recently published 40-month case series showed that chloroprocaine lavage can be used as part of a multimodal approach to treating intraoperative pain. In this case series, the technique of chloroprocaine lavage helped investigators to avoid general endotracheal anesthesia in 32 women having a cesarean delivery.

In this case series, no patients exhibited clinical signs of systemic local anesthetic toxicity. It is believed that chloroprocaine has a limited potential for toxicity because of its short plasma half-life, which is only 11-21 seconds. The purpose of this study is to determine the amount of chloroprocaine that is taken up into the blood stream after intraperitoneal administration to ensure that blood levels are low and do not raise a safety concern. Data obtained from this study will help to define a safe dose of chloroprocaine for intraperitoneal administration.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cesarean Section

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Preservative free Chloroprocaine Group 1

40 ml of preservative-free 1% chloroprocaine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Preservative free 1% Chloroprocaine

Intervention Type DRUG

40 ml of preservative-free 1% chloroprocaine is planned for administration into the peritoneal cavity after delivery of the baby.

Preservative free Chloroprocaine Group 2

40 ml of preservative-free 2% chloroprocaine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Preservative free 2% Chloroprocaine

Intervention Type DRUG

40 ml of preservative-free 2% chloroprocaine is planned for administration into the peritoneal cavity after delivery of the baby.

Preservative free Chloroprocaine Group 3

40 ml of preservative-free 3% chloroprocaine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Preservative free 3% Chloroprocaine

Intervention Type DRUG

40 ml of preservative-free 3% chloroprocaine is planned for administration into the peritoneal cavity after delivery of the baby.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Preservative free 1% Chloroprocaine

40 ml of preservative-free 1% chloroprocaine is planned for administration into the peritoneal cavity after delivery of the baby.

Intervention Type DRUG

Preservative free 2% Chloroprocaine

40 ml of preservative-free 2% chloroprocaine is planned for administration into the peritoneal cavity after delivery of the baby.

Intervention Type DRUG

Preservative free 3% Chloroprocaine

40 ml of preservative-free 3% chloroprocaine is planned for administration into the peritoneal cavity after delivery of the baby.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Nesacaine Nesacaine Nesacaine

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subjects ≥ 18 to 50 years of age having scheduled cesarean sections on 12C (Labor and Delivery) within Oregon Health \& Science University (OHSU).
* Only subjects having spinal anesthesia will be eligible.
* Only subjects that can have a Pfannenstiel incision will be enrolled.

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects with chronic narcotic usage
* Subjects that are deemed to need a combined spinal epidural for any reason.
* Subjects who are unable to successfully get a spinal block
* Subjects with known atypical cholinesterase activity
* American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status IV or higher
* Subjects with contraindication to neuraxial anesthesia (coagulopathy, infection)
* Subjects with stage 4 chronic kidney disease or worse (eGFR \< 30 ml/min)
* Subjects with significant hepatic dysfunction (AST or ALT \> 2x the upper limit of normal)
* Subjects with allergies to drugs required for this protocol.
* Subjects with multifetal gestations
* Subjects with a BMI \> 40 kg/m2
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Oregon Health and Science University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Brandon M Togioka

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Brandon M Togioka, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Oregon Health and Science University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

OHSU Labor and Delivery; Oregon Health and Science University Hospital

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ranney B, Stanage WF. Advantages of local anesthesia for cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol. 1975 Feb;45(2):163-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1118089 (View on PubMed)

Togioka BM, Zarnegarnia Y, Bleyle LA, Koop D, Brookfield K, Yanez ND, Treggiari MM. Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Intraperitoneal Chloroprocaine After Fetal Extraction in Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery. Anesth Analg. 2022 Oct 1;135(4):777-786. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006064. Epub 2022 May 11.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35544759 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

19021

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.