Fixed Dose MMF vs Concentration Controlled MMF After Renal Transplantation

NCT ID: NCT00166244

Last Updated: 2009-02-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

901 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-05-31

Study Completion Date

2006-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Determine the value of a clinically feasible strategy of therapeutic drug monitoring compared with fixed dosing in de novo MMF treated renal transplant recipients with respect to the incidence of treatment failure.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

For treatment with mycophenolate mofetil the contribution of TDM still has to be determined, although circumstantial evidence suggests the measurement of mycophenolic acid plasma concentrations adds to patient management.

A concerted effort to test the hypothesis that TDM will improve outcome in mycophenolate mofetil therapy in a prospective randomised trial is to be made if we want to have a solid base for the continued measurements of mycophenolic acid concentrations in the future. This trial aims to demonstrate the added value of TDM for mycophenolic acid, by comparing fixed dose treatment with concentration controlled mycophenolate mofetil treatment in kidney transplant recipients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

De Novo Renal Transplant Recipient.

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Fixed Dose

1 g MMF twice-daily (bid) for adults or 600 mg/m2 bid for paediatric patients. Treatment to be given orally unless it is not possible, in which case it is administered via intravenous (iv) infusion.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Mycophenolate Mofetil

Intervention Type DRUG

1 g for adult patients and 300 mg/m2 for paediatric patients. Fixed dose arm: 1 g twice a day (bid) for adults and 600mg/m2 bid for paediatric patients.

Concentration controlled arm: initial dose will be 1 g bid for adults and 600mg/m2 bid for paediatric patients. Abbreviated AUCs (taken at timepoints: 0, 30min and 120min in fasted patients) on Days 3 and 10, Week 4, Months 3, 6 and 12 will be performed to determine mycophenolic acid levels in plasma.

Concentration Controlled

1 g MMF bid for adults or 600 mg/m2 bid for paediatric patients. Thereafter, MMF doses will be adjusted to MPA AUC0-12 between 30-60mg.h/L based on 3-point abbreviated AUCs (taken at timepoints: 0, 30 min and 120 min always in fasted patients, except for pediatric patients on concomitant tacrolimus) on Days 3 and 10, Week 4, Months 3, 6 and 12 will be performed to determine MPA levels in plasma.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Mycophenolate Mofetil

Intervention Type DRUG

1 g for adult patients and 300 mg/m2 for paediatric patients. Fixed dose arm: 1 g twice a day (bid) for adults and 600mg/m2 bid for paediatric patients.

Concentration controlled arm: initial dose will be 1 g bid for adults and 600mg/m2 bid for paediatric patients. Abbreviated AUCs (taken at timepoints: 0, 30min and 120min in fasted patients) on Days 3 and 10, Week 4, Months 3, 6 and 12 will be performed to determine mycophenolic acid levels in plasma.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Mycophenolate Mofetil

1 g for adult patients and 300 mg/m2 for paediatric patients. Fixed dose arm: 1 g twice a day (bid) for adults and 600mg/m2 bid for paediatric patients.

Concentration controlled arm: initial dose will be 1 g bid for adults and 600mg/m2 bid for paediatric patients. Abbreviated AUCs (taken at timepoints: 0, 30min and 120min in fasted patients) on Days 3 and 10, Week 4, Months 3, 6 and 12 will be performed to determine mycophenolic acid levels in plasma.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

CellCept

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Renal transplant recipients who have completed their second birthday,
* Recipients from living (related or unrelated), cadaveric (non-heart beating or heart beating) donors,
* Single organ recipient (kidney only),
* Women of childbearing potential should have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test with a sensitivity of at least 50 mIU/ml within 1 week prior to beginning MMF treatment. Effective contraception must be used before beginning therapy, during therapy and for 6 weeks following discontinuation of therapy, even where there has been a history of infertility, unless due to hysterectomy,
* Patients or patient's parent/guardian providing written informed consent,
* Patients co-operative and able to complete all the assessment procedures.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy (except steroid treatment) within the preceding 28 days, except that immunosuppressive medication may be initiated up to 48 hours before transplantation. Furthermore, all patients should receive 1 g \[adults\] or 600 mg/m2 \[paediatric patients\] of MMF therapy within 6 hours prior to transplantation,
* PRA \> 50% within 6 months prior to enrolment,
* Cold ischaemia time \>48 hours,
* History of malignancy (except localised non-melanotic skin cancer) or the presence of any active malignancy at the time of transplant,
* Active peptic ulcer disease,
* Active infection,
* Mandatory intake of prohibited drugs or it is probable that the patient will require treatment with such drugs after transplant,
* Pregnant or lactating females,
* Women of child-bearing potential not willing to use a reliable form of contraception,
* Patient is allergic or intolerant to polysorbate 80 (TWEEN), phenylalanine (aspartame), steroids, MMF, MPA, tacrolimus or cyclosporin,
* Patient or donor with positive tests for HIV or hepatitis B surface antigen,
* Patients with liver cirrhosis or clinical evidence of portal hypertension or other indication of moderate or severe liver disease. (Note: it is strongly recommended that patients with hepatitis C have a liver biopsy performed prior to transplantation),
* Incompatible ABO blood type and/or positive crossmatch,
* Patient has any form of substance abuse, psychiatric disorder or condition, which, in the opinion of the investigator, may invalidate communication with the investigator or with study procedures,
* Patients whose laboratory results reveal severe anaemia (as defined by a haemoglobin value \<6 mmol/L \[9.7 g/dL\] for adults receiving erythropoietin, \<4.1 mmol/L \[6.6 g/dL\] for paediatric patients \[regardless of erythropoietin treatment\]), leukopenia (as defined by a WBC value of \<2500/mm3) or thrombocytopenia (as defined by a platelet count of \<75,000/mm3).
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hoffmann-La Roche

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Erasmus Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Erasmus Medical Center

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Teun van Gelder, Dr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Erasmus Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

John Hunter Hospital

New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Princess Alexandra Hospital

Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Monash Medical Centre

Clayton, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

St Vincent's Hospital

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Royal Melbourne Hospital

Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital

Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia

Site Status

Royal Perth Hospital

Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Site Status

Med. Univ. Klinik

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

AKH Wien

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

University Hospitals Leuven

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Hospital do Rim e Hipertensao

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Vancouver General Hospital

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Ruijin Hospital

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status

West China Hospital of Sichuan University

Chengdu, Sichuan, China

Site Status

Odense University Hospital

Odense, , Denmark

Site Status

Surgical Clinic Of Tartu University Clinics

Tartu, , Estonia

Site Status

Hopital Pellegrin, C.H.R.de Bordeaux

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Hospital du Bocage

Dijon, , France

Site Status

CHU de Grenoble

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

CHU Kremlin Bicêtre

Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, , France

Site Status

Hopital Calmette

Lille, , France

Site Status

Hopital Jeanne de Flandres

Lille, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire

Limoges, , France

Site Status

CHU Hotel Dieu

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Hopital Necker

Paris, , France

Site Status

Hopital Tenon

Paris, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud

Pierre-Bénite, , France

Site Status

Hopital Foch

Suresnes, , France

Site Status

CHU Purpan

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

CHU Rangueil

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

CHU de Nancy-Brabois

Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France

Site Status

Universitatsklinikum Charite

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Stadt Kliniken Koln

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

Chirurgische Universitätsklinik

Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany

Site Status

Universitatsklinikum Heidelberg

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

University of Heidelberg

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

University Hospital Wurzburg

Würzburg, , Germany

Site Status

Vilnius University Hospital

Vilnius, , Lithuania

Site Status

Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum

Leiden, , Netherlands

Site Status

Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Rikshopitalet

Oslo, , Norway

Site Status

Institute of Transplantology, Medical University of Warsaw

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Children's Memorial Health Institute

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Hospital Son Dureta

Palma de Mallorca, 07014, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Infanta Christa

Badajoz, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Del Mar

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Valle de Hebron

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Sant Joan de Deu

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Reina Sofia

Córdoba, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital de las Nieves

Granada, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Ramon Y Cajal

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Fundacion Jimenez Diaz

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clinico San Carlos

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

La Paz

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Complejo Hospitalario Univeritario de Santiago

Santiago de Compostela, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Virgen del Rocio

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Dr. Peset

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

University Hospital, Malmo

Malmo, , Sweden

Site Status

Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

University Hospital A

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

National Taiwan University Hospital

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Royal Free Hospital

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Guys and St Thomas's Hospital

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

St George's Hospital

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Hospital "Miguel Perez Carreno"

Caracas, , Venezuela

Site Status

Hospital Universitario de Caracas

Caracas, , Venezuela

Site Status

Hospital Universitario de Maracaibo

Maracaibo, , Venezuela

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia Austria Belgium Brazil Canada China Denmark Estonia France Germany Lithuania Netherlands Norway Poland Spain Sweden Taiwan United Kingdom Venezuela

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

van Gelder T, Hilbrands LB, Vanrenterghem Y, Weimar W, de Fijter JW, Squifflet JP, Hene RJ, Verpooten GA, Navarro MT, Hale MD, Nicholls AJ. A randomized double-blind, multicenter plasma concentration controlled study of the safety and efficacy of oral mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection after kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 1999 Jul 27;68(2):261-6. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199907270-00018.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10440399 (View on PubMed)

van Gelder T, Silva HT, de Fijter JW, Budde K, Kuypers D, Tyden G, Lohmus A, Sommerer C, Hartmann A, Le Meur Y, Oellerich M, Holt DW, Tonshoff B, Keown P, Campbell S, Mamelok RD. Comparing mycophenolate mofetil regimens for de novo renal transplant recipients: the fixed-dose concentration-controlled trial. Transplantation. 2008 Oct 27;86(8):1043-51. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318186f98a.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18946341 (View on PubMed)

Hocker B, van Gelder T, Martin-Govantes J, Machado P, Tedesco H, Rubik J, Dehennault M, Garcia Meseguer C, Tonshoff B; FDCC Study Group. Comparison of MMF efficacy and safety in paediatric vs. adult renal transplantation: subgroup analysis of the randomised, multicentre FDCC trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011 Mar;26(3):1073-9. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq450. Epub 2010 Jul 28.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 20670958 (View on PubMed)

van Gelder T, Tedesco Silva H, de Fijter JW, Budde K, Kuypers D, Arns W, Soulillou JP, Kanellis J, Zelvys A, Ekberg H, Holzer H, Rostaing L, Mamelok RD. Renal transplant patients at high risk of acute rejection benefit from adequate exposure to mycophenolic acid. Transplantation. 2010 Mar 15;89(5):595-9. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181ca7d84.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 20124953 (View on PubMed)

van Schaik RH, van Agteren M, de Fijter JW, Hartmann A, Schmidt J, Budde K, Kuypers D, Le Meur Y, van der Werf M, Mamelok R, van Gelder T. UGT1A9 -275T>A/-2152C>T polymorphisms correlate with low MPA exposure and acute rejection in MMF/tacrolimus-treated kidney transplant patients. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Sep;86(3):319-27. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2009.83. Epub 2009 Jun 3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 19494809 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FDCC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.