Reduction in the Risk of Rejection by Mycophenolate Mofetil Dose Adjustment in Liver Transplant Patients With Side Effects Caused by the Calcineurine Inhibitors

NCT ID: NCT00456235

Last Updated: 2013-04-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

92 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-09-30

Study Completion Date

2011-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this project is to determine whether, in liver transplant patients with side effects due to ICN, the use of MMF in monotherapy can be optimised by dose adjustment based on the area under the curve (AUC) of mycophenolic acid (MPA). It involves a multicentre phase IV trial with direct individual benefit.

A population of 130 liver transplant patients at 2 to 10 years post-transplant, showing significant clinical ICN side effects and being given bitherapy by ICN +MMF will be included and randomised 1:1 in two arms:

* Arm 1: progressive interruption of ICN after obtaining an AUC of MPA of 50 mg.h/l, followed by MMF monotherapy with dose adjustment based on the AUC of MPA,
* Arm 2: continuation of the ICN+MMF bitherapy without MMF therapeutic drug monitoring.

The main judgement criterion will be the incidence of acute rejection in the 2 groups at 6 months. The secondary judgment criterion will be the evaluation of the benefit of stopping ICN on the side effects caused by these drugs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Liver Transplantation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

adjument MMF

adjusting the dose according to the MMF AUC of mycophenolic acid

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Mycophénolate Mofétil

Intervention Type DRUG

Ciclosporine A

Intervention Type DRUG

Tacrolimus

Intervention Type DRUG

continued treatment

Continued treatment empirically usual

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Mycophénolate Mofétil

Intervention Type DRUG

Ciclosporine A

Intervention Type DRUG

Tacrolimus

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Mycophénolate Mofétil

Intervention Type DRUG

Ciclosporine A

Intervention Type DRUG

Tacrolimus

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient with first liver transplantion or retransplantation since more than 6 months: with a post-transplant lapse of time of 2 to 10 years and showing one of the following adverse effects of ICN:
* Renal insufficiency defined by a creatinine clearance \<50ml/mn (calculated or estimated according to the Cockcroft formula)
* Arterial hypertension not controlled by an anti-hypertensive bitherapy
* Diabetes mellitus (fasting glycaemia \>7.0mmol/l), whether treated or not
* Neuromuscular toxicity
* Immunosuppression by cyclosporine or tacrolimus and MMF
* Hepatic biopsy performed within the 6 months preceding the inclusion for the patients with a post-transplant period of \<5 years and in the 12 months preceding the inclusion for patients with a post transplant period of \>5 years.

Exclusion Criteria

* Acute rejection within the 6 months preceding the screening
* Previous history of cortico-resistant rejection
* Chronic rejection
* Significant ductopenia (absence of inter-lobule biliary canals in more than 30% of the portal tracts) on the pre-screening biopsy.
* Existence of a pre-transplantation diabetes mellitus.
* Liver transplantation for auto-immune hepatitis or primary sclerosing cholangitis
* Patients transplanted for viral C cirrhosis with reinfection lesions of the transplanted organ, rendering treatment by ribarivine + interferon conceivable in the year following inclusion.
* Counter-indications to MMF (anaemia, leucopenia)
* Immunosuppression by sirolimus, everolimus, azathioprine or corticoids
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Limoges

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pierre MARQUET, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHU Limoges

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU de Besançon

Besançon, , France

Site Status

CHU de Bordeaux

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

CHU de Caen

Caen, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Beaujon

Clichy, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Henri Mondor

Créteil, , France

Site Status

CHU de Grenoble

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

CHU de Lille

Lille, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Edouard Herriot

Lyon, , France

Site Status

CHU de Marseille

Marseille, , France

Site Status

CHU de Montpellier

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

CHU de Nice

Nice, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Saint Antoine

Paris, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Cochin

Paris, , France

Site Status

CHU de Rennes

Rennes, , France

Site Status

CHU de Strasbourg

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

CHU de Toulouse

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Paul Brousse

Villejuif, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

I06024

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.