Comparing Efficacy & Safety of Tacrolimus & MMF With/Without Induction in the Elderly Following Kidney Transplantation.

NCT ID: NCT00296309

Last Updated: 2014-09-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

267 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-10-31

Study Completion Date

2006-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Primary objective of this study is to compare the renal function as well as the incidence of renal dysfunction, the incidence of death, graft loss and acute rejection. Secondary Objective is to compare the efficacy and safety profiles of the two regimens in elderly renal transplanted patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The use of tacrolimus-based primary immunosuppression in elderly renal transplant recipients is efficacious and safe, particularly in combination with MMF, and seems to be associated with lower mortality and graft loss rates than classic cyclosporin protocols. Nevertheless, the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in monotherapy, double or triple therapy with MMF, as well as the induction therapy with the new anti-IL2 receptor antibodies have not been adequately used in controlled trials in the elderly renal transplant patient. There is only scarce information on age-associated immune responsiveness and only a few aged-adapted immunosuppressive regimens have been described.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Kidney Transplantation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Tacrolimus

Intervention Type DRUG

Immunosuppression

2

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tacrolimus

Intervention Type DRUG

Immunosuppression

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tacrolimus

Immunosuppression

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with minimum 60 years of age and end stage kidney disease who are suitable candidates for primary renal transplantation or retransplantation are eligible for the study. Patients receiving a kidney transplant, from a cadaveric or living donor (not HLA identical) with compatible ABO blood type can be included.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient has an immunological high risk
* Cold ischemia time greater than 30 hours.
* Patient has significant liver disease
* Patient is allergic or intolerant to study medication
* Patient or donor is known to be HIV positive.
* Patient with malignancy or history of malignancy
* Patient has significant, uncontrolled concomitant infections
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Astellas Pharma Inc

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Medical Physician

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

Créteil, , France

Site Status

Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, , France

Site Status

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Nice, , France

Site Status

Suresnes, , France

Site Status

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Tours, , France

Site Status

Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Freiberg, , Germany

Site Status

Halle, , Germany

Site Status

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Jena, , Germany

Site Status

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Lübeck, , Germany

Site Status

München, , Germany

Site Status

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

Rostock, , Germany

Site Status

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Santander, , Spain

Site Status

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Belfast, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Cambridge, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Nottingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium France Germany Netherlands Spain Switzerland United Kingdom

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FG-506-02-42

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.