Influence of Pharmaceutical Care on the Intraindividual Variability of Tacrolimus Concentrations

NCT ID: NCT02402140

Last Updated: 2015-11-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

128 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-02-28

Study Completion Date

2014-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Primary end-point

The primary end-point was the influence of pharmaceutical intervention in tacrolimus intra-subject variability during the first 3 months after kidney transplant. Coefficients of variation were calculated from the average of dose-corrected tacrolimus blood concentration(CV= Standard Deviation (SD) x 100/mean) of study visits day 10, 14, 21, 30, 60 and 90 post kidney transplant.

Secondary end-points

1. Secondary outcomes included evaluate percentage of patients who achieved target levels of tacrolimus in day study visits 7, 10, 14, 21, 28, 60 e 90 days after kidney transplant;
2. Tacrolimus bioavailability profile during the period of 3 months,characterized by mean and standard deviation (SD) of dose corrected tacrolimus blood concentration(ng/ml/mg);
3. Assess patient adherence through validated questionnaire "Portuguese version of Basel Scale Adherence Rating Immunosuppressive Drugs (BAASIS) scale". It consists of a four-item questionnaire measuring nonadherence to immunosuppressives over the past four weeks. This questionnaire assesses omission of single doses or successive doses, timing deviations \>2h and dose reductions. Responses are given on a six-point scale: never, once per month, every second week, every week, more than once per week and every day. Patients that answer different from "never" in any of the four questions are considered as nonadherent;
4. We evaluated renal function eGFR by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD);
5. We evaluated Incidence of Infections;
6. We evaluated Treated acute rejection episodes;
7. We evaluated Death cases;
8. We evaluated Graft loss cases;
9. We evaluated Discontinuation of immunosuppressive treatment;
10. We evaluated Hospital readmissions.

Study Design

This was a single-center, prospective, randomized and controlled study to evaluate the influence of pharmaceutical intervention in tacrolimus intra-subject variability during the first 3 months after transplantation. The authors designed the protocol, acquired and maintained the data, and conducted the statistical analysis. The protocol was approved by an independent ethics committee. All subjects signed a written informed consent before enrollment and the study was conducted according to good clinical practices and declaration of Helsinki. This study was conducted at Hospital do Rim between February 2014 and December 2014, 128 randomized and were followed for 3 months after transplantation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Population

Inclusion criteria were patients who underwent renal transplantation aged ≥18 years old, who signed the informed consent, who underwent follow-up post transplant clinic at the Hospital do Rim for 3 months, receiving immunosuppressive drugs tacrolimus, prednisone and sodium mycophenolate or tacrolimus, azathioprine, and prednisone. Exclusion criteria were patients who underwent second kidney transplant, which did not follow the Hospital do Rim after transplant and who were participating in some other study with pharmaceutical intervention.

Randomization The randomization plan was carried out in blocks and stratified by immunosuppressive drugs tacrolimus, prednisone and mycophenolate sodium or tacrolimus, prednisone and azathioprine.

Opaque envelopes were made from a table of random numbers and they were open on the day of randomization to determine the group to which each patient was allocated group 1 with pharmaceutical intervention or group 2 without pharmaceutical intervention.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Renal Transplant Graft Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1 with pharmaceutical intervention

Patients allocated to group 1 with pharmaceutical intervention received instructions on the proper use of immunosuppressants as dosage, frequency and administration schedules, importance of immunosuppressive drugs and the risk of rejection.

No more interventions were applied.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Pharmaceutical Intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients allocated to group 1, with pharmaceutical intervention, received instructions on the proper use of immunosuppressants as doses, frequency, importance, schedules on the following days 3, 5, 7, 10, 14, 21, 28, 60 and 90 after kidney transplant. Teaching materials were designed to assist in the pharmaceutical guidelines that understood the importance of immunosuppressive drugs, the risk of rejection, the schedules and the most appropriate way for the administration. In addition to these guidelines, pharmacists helped patients in filling out the patient diary. This diary contains all the medications that the patient administers and encourages them to write down daily doses in order to remind them. This was a standardized pharmacist intervention.

2 without pharmaceutical intervention

Standard following of the Hospital do Rim, without pharmaceutical intervention. This group was just followed by the nurses of the hospital, but without a standardized intervention.

It was not a intervention, it was the control group

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pharmaceutical Intervention

Patients allocated to group 1, with pharmaceutical intervention, received instructions on the proper use of immunosuppressants as doses, frequency, importance, schedules on the following days 3, 5, 7, 10, 14, 21, 28, 60 and 90 after kidney transplant. Teaching materials were designed to assist in the pharmaceutical guidelines that understood the importance of immunosuppressive drugs, the risk of rejection, the schedules and the most appropriate way for the administration. In addition to these guidelines, pharmacists helped patients in filling out the patient diary. This diary contains all the medications that the patient administers and encourages them to write down daily doses in order to remind them. This was a standardized pharmacist intervention.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients who underwent renal transplantation aged ≥18 years old,
* who signed the informed consent,
* who underwent follow-up post transplant clinic at the Hospital do Rim for 3 months,
* receiving immunosuppressive drugs tacrolimus, prednisone and sodium mycophenolate or tacrolimus, azathioprine, and prednisone.

Exclusion Criteria

* were patients who underwent second kidney transplant,
* which did not follow the Hospital do Rim after transplant and who were participating in some other study with pharmaceutical intervention.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital do Rim e Hipertensão

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Adrieli Barros Bessa

Pharmacist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Adrieli BA Bessa, Pharmacist

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital do Rim

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mellon L, Doyle F, Hickey A, Ward KD, de Freitas DG, McCormick PA, O'Connell O, Conlon P. Interventions for increasing immunosuppressant medication adherence in solid organ transplant recipients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 12;9(9):CD012854. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012854.pub2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36094829 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Hospital do Rim

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.