Skin Incision Study - Closure of Skin Incisions in Gynecological Cancer Surgery
NCT ID: NCT00107627
Last Updated: 2009-06-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
90 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-03-31
2006-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Randomized Clinical Trial of Skin Closure With Staples Versus Suture
NCT01977612
Secondary Versus Tertiary Wound Closure in High Risk Gynecologic Abdominal Surgical Incisions
NCT03861065
Comparison of Subcuticular Suture Versus Surgical Staples for Closure of Pfannenstiel Skin Incisions
NCT00186732
Effect of Skin Closure Techniques on Body Image in Women Undergoing Gynecologic Surgery
NCT07327125
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Sutures vs Staples for High Tension Closures
NCT06638736
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* cosmesis;
* pain;
* adverse events.
The two most common methods of skin incision closure are staples or subcuticular sutures. Adverse events to surgical incisions represent major and significant burdens to patients and the health care system; however, no data is available comparing methods of skin closure. Surgeons have traditionally had to use personal belief rather than data or evidence to choose the method of skin incision closure. This study evaluates three types of skin closure methods:
* Skin staples;
* Monocryl subcuticular sutures;
* Caprosyn subcuticular sutures.
The objective of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy of sutures and staples at 6 weeks and at 3 months following the operation by measuring cosmesis and pain. These are assessed by both the patient and the surgeon independently using linear analogue scales and by collecting information on analgesic medications taken by the patient. The safety of the staples and sutures will be expressed by the incidence of adverse events following surgery. Post-operative events such as wound infection, other wound complications, grade of inflammation, hemorrhage and other complications will be graded according to the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC version 3) and recorded.
Investigators will invite public patients with proven or suspected gynecological cancer from Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital and Mater Hospital (RBWH) that are booked to have elective surgery and that meet the selection criteria to participate in this study.
This is a pilot study to generate data for a definitive randomized study. Ninety (90) patients are required for recruitment to the pilot study.
The type of closure method patients will receive will be allocated using a randomization process. Three equally sized study arms of 30 patients will have their surgical incision closed with either surgical staples, Monocryl or Caprosyn. Additionally, patients will be stratified by site so as to remove selection bias.
All tests and assessments before and after the operation are standard of care. These results will be recorded. No additional tests or assessments will be performed for the aim of this trial.
Randomization, data management and statistical analysis will be coordinated by the Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer. Statistical analysis will include calculating mean values and standard deviations for scores for each group at each assessment. Chi-square tests will be used to compare differences in proportions of patients who did or did not experience adverse events at each time point.
Results of this trial will be presented at scientific meetings at a national and international level and at educational meetings with medical staff. The results of this trial will also be submitted for publishing. The study will generate data for a definitive randomized study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Skin staples;
Skin staples;
Skin staples;
2
Monocryl subcuticular sutures.
Monocryl subcuticular sutures.
Monocryl subcuticular sutures.
3
Caprosyn subcuticular sutures.
Caprosyn subcuticular sutures.
Caprosyn subcuticular sutures.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Caprosyn subcuticular sutures.
Caprosyn subcuticular sutures.
Monocryl subcuticular sutures.
Monocryl subcuticular sutures.
Skin staples;
Skin staples;
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Surgery for suspected or proven gynecological cancer
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1
* Patient compliance and geographic proximity that allow adequate follow-up
* Signed written informed consent
* Females \>=18 years of age
Exclusion Criteria
* Laparoscopic procedures
* Unwillingness of the patient to participate in the trial
* Non-compliance of participant
* Unavailability for follow-up
* Patients who are unable or unwilling to give informed consent
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Andreas Obermair
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
QCGC, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
Herston, Queensland, Australia
Mater Adult Public Hospital
South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SIS001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.