Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
INTERVENTIONAL
1999-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Role of Mechanical Stress and Muscle Fatigue in Strength Gains
NCT01216774
Effects of Unloading on Muscle Mass
NCT00936039
Strength Training and Muscle Lipids
NCT06480747
Resistance Training in Children
NCT06096610
Agility and Performance Among High School Basketball Players Following a Coach-Led Neuromuscular Training Program
NCT07023276
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study will evaluate the relationship between mental effort muscle strength improvements by comparing the improvement in muscle strength in participants who have trained with different levels of mental effort. In addition to evaluating muscle strength, this study will also examine the neural mechanisms underlying muscle strength improvements.
Four groups of volunteers (65 years old and over) will participate in a training program directed at elbow-flexor muscles. One group will be trained with an intensity near the level of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC group); a second group will be trained with high mental effort, low muscle intensity contractions (HME group); a third group will be trained with low mental effort, low muscle intensity elbow-flexion contractions (LME group); and the fourth (control) group will not be trained but will participate in the strength tests. Training will be performed every weekday for 12 weeks. Participants will be evaluated by functional MRI (fMRI), EEG-derived motor activity-related cortical potential (MRCP), surface EMG signals, and the MRI T2 relaxation time.
Preliminary analysis of results shows that the HME group gained more than 13% strength, the LME group showed a statistically insignificant 6% change, and the no-practice control group did not show any change in elbow flexor muscle strength. We expect the MVC group to have the highest strength gains among the four groups.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Mental effort in muscle strengthening
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Neuromuscular disorders
* Medications known to affect neuromuscular system (other than moderate alcohol or caffeine)
* Left-hand dominant
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
NIH
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Guang H. Yue, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Biomedical Engineering
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.