Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
OBSERVATIONAL
2000-09-30
2004-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Genetic Epidemiology of CVD Risk Factors
NCT00053521
Cardiovascular Risk Factors in United States Adolescents and Adults
NCT00005171
Failure Time Methods for Family Disease Studies
NCT00037232
Epidemiology of Cardiovascular Diseases in The Elderly
NCT00005186
New CVD Risk Factors for Lowered Cognitive Functioning
NCT00037310
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Several algorithms have been developed to calculate multivariate risk of CVD based on characteristics associated with the disease. Framingham Heart Study data were used to develop the original algorithms, along with later models, using different mathematical forms, outcomes, and characteristics. Researchers then began to investigate the issue of generalizability, whether these risk estimates could be applied to new populations. For these algorithms to have general application, they must be able to rank risk correctly. And, when Framingham models were compared to new models developed for other studies, resulting orderings of risk were, in fact, similar.
The ability to order risk correctly, however, does not imply that estimated probabilities are right in terms of predicting disease for individuals. Methods are needed to assess individual risk to make treatment decisions, do cost-benefit analyses, and quantify benefits. These methods must be based on the patient's absolute risk, and existing equations may be incapable of establishing absolute risk across populations.
Earlier comparisons of multivariate risk among studies have made comparison populations as homogenous as possible before analysis. However, if multivariate risk estimates are to be truly useful, they must be applicable to the general population, and to be applicable, estimates must be based on comparisons of cohorts that include women and ethnic minorities. Also, in statistical terms, estimates must be robust enough to allow for minor shifts in methodologies for data collection and endpoint definition.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
The heterogeneity of multivariate risk in different populations was examined based on data from studies representing national samples, cohort studies, and clinical trials. An analysis of these studies was conducted that included both sexes, various risk profiles, and representatives from several nationalities and ethnic groups. The pooled sample involved 20 studies, 233,833 participants, and over 47,000 deaths. Based on a common statistical approach, proportional hazards models were developed for each study to relate a set of essential characteristics to the prediction of CVD mortality. The characteristics included body mass index, age, blood pressure, serum cholesterol, smoking, and diabetes status. The models were then compared in terms of their ability to predict absolute risk of mortality across studies.
Secondary analyses were conducted to discover factors associated with inaccurate prediction and study characteristics associated with particular findings, such as interaction terms. An empirical examination was conducted of methods for adding newly discovered risk factors to existing prediction equations.
The study completion date listed in this record was obtained from the "End Date" entered in the Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) record.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
NIH
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Daniel McGee
Role:
Florida State University
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Natarajan S, Liao Y, Cao G, Lipsitz SR, McGee DL. Sex differences in risk for coronary heart disease mortality associated with diabetes and established coronary heart disease. Arch Intern Med. 2003 Jul 28;163(14):1735-40. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.14.1735.
Diverse Populations Collaboration. Smoking, body weight, and CHD mortality in diverse populations. Prev Med. 2004 Jun;38(6):834-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.12.022.
Natarajan S, Liao Y, Sinha D, Cao G, McGee DL, Lipsitz SR. Sex differences in the effect of diabetes duration on coronary heart disease mortality. Arch Intern Med. 2005 Feb 28;165(4):430-5. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.4.430.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
950
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.