Repositioning the Bolus Tracking ROI to the Superior Vena Cava in CTPA Facilitates Contrast Volume Reduction

NCT ID: NCT07342374

Last Updated: 2026-01-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

72 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-02-01

Study Completion Date

2024-12-16

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized controlled trial evaluates a protocol optimization for Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA). The study investigates the impact of repositioning the bolus-tracking region-of-interest (ROI) from the standard pulmonary trunk (PT) to the superior vena cava (SVC). The goal is to compensate for the CT scanner's inherent transit delay time (TDT) to better align the scan with the peak arterial phase. By optimizing this timing, the study assesses whether contrast media volume can be safely reduced by 40% (from 50 ml to 30 ml) while maintaining diagnostic image quality and preventing venous contamination.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background and Rationale: Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA) is the gold standard for diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE). However, standard bolus tracking (BT) protocols that place the monitoring region-of-interest (ROI) on the main pulmonary trunk (PT) often face challenges due to the system's inherent Transit Delay Time (TDT). This delay, typically 5 seconds, can cause the diagnostic scan window to overlap with the venous phase, leading to suboptimal arterial opacification and venous contamination. This study proposes repositioning the monitoring ROI upstream to the superior vena cava (SVC) to utilize the TDT as transit time for the bolus, thereby aligning the scan window with the peak arterial phase.

Study Objectives: The primary objective is to evaluate the effect of SVC ROI repositioning on diagnostic image quality while investigating the feasibility of reducing contrast media (CM) volume by 40% (from 50 ml to 30 ml).

Methodology: This is a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial involving 72 adult patients. Participants are randomized into four protocol groups:

Group A (Control): ROI at PT, 50 ml contrast media. Group B: ROI at PT, 30 ml contrast media. Group C: ROI at SVC, 50 ml contrast media. Group D: ROI at SVC, 30 ml contrast media.

Protocol Details:

* Contrast Administration: Non-ionic contrast medium (370 mgI/ml) is injected at a rate of 4 ml/s, followed by a 20 ml saline flush.
* Bolus Tracking: An elliptical ROI is placed either on the PT (above the carina) or SVC depending on the group assignment.
* Triggering: The diagnostic scan is automatically initiated when enhancement reaches a threshold of 100 HU. The TDT is set to a fixed 5 seconds.
* Assessment: Diagnostic quality is assessed quantitatively by calculating arterial-venous enhancement differences (HU) and qualitatively via a 5-point Likert scale by three blinded radiologists.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pulmonary Artery Embolism Pulmonary Embolism (PE)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This study uses a four-arm parallel assignment to compare two primary factors: the anatomical location of the bolus-tracking region of interest (ROI) and the volume of contrast media administered. Participants are randomized into one of four distinct protocol groups (Groups A, B, C, or D) to evaluate image quality and opacification differences across the various combinations of ROI placement (Pulmonary Trunk vs. Superior Vena Cava) and contrast volume (50 ml vs. 30 ml).
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Three senior radiologists served as blinded outcomes assessors for this study. These assessors were blinded to all protocol details, including the anatomical location of the bolus-tracking region of interest (ROI) and the volume of contrast media administered for each participant. The CTPA images were anonymized and presented to the assessors in a randomized order to ensure objective qualitative evaluation of image quality using the 5-point Likert scale.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A: PT-ROI, 50 ml (Control)

Standard CTPA protocol using the bolus tracking technique with the monitoring region of interest (ROI) placed at the pulmonary trunk (PT) and 50 ml of contrast media.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Optimized CTPA Protocol

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

CTPA scans are performed on a 128-slice CT scanner using the bolus tracking technique. Non-ionic contrast medium (370 mgI/ml) is administered at a rate of 4 ml/s, followed by a 20 ml saline flush. The diagnostic scan is automatically triggered when enhancement in the monitoring region of interest (ROI) reaches a threshold of 100 HU, with a fixed transit delay time (TDT) of 5 seconds.

Group B: PT-ROI, 30 ml

Modified CTPA protocol using the bolus tracking technique with the monitoring ROI at the pulmonary trunk (PT) and a reduced contrast volume of 30 ml.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Optimized CTPA Protocol

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

CTPA scans are performed on a 128-slice CT scanner using the bolus tracking technique. Non-ionic contrast medium (370 mgI/ml) is administered at a rate of 4 ml/s, followed by a 20 ml saline flush. The diagnostic scan is automatically triggered when enhancement in the monitoring region of interest (ROI) reaches a threshold of 100 HU, with a fixed transit delay time (TDT) of 5 seconds.

Group C: SVC-ROI, 50 ml

Modified CTPA protocol using the bolus tracking technique with the monitoring ROI repositioned upstream to the superior vena cava (SVC) and 50 ml of contrast media.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Optimized CTPA Protocol

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

CTPA scans are performed on a 128-slice CT scanner using the bolus tracking technique. Non-ionic contrast medium (370 mgI/ml) is administered at a rate of 4 ml/s, followed by a 20 ml saline flush. The diagnostic scan is automatically triggered when enhancement in the monitoring region of interest (ROI) reaches a threshold of 100 HU, with a fixed transit delay time (TDT) of 5 seconds.

Group D: SVC-ROI, 30 ml

Modified CTPA protocol using the bolus tracking technique with the monitoring ROI repositioned upstream to the superior vena cava (SVC) and a reduced contrast volume of 30 ml.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Optimized CTPA Protocol

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

CTPA scans are performed on a 128-slice CT scanner using the bolus tracking technique. Non-ionic contrast medium (370 mgI/ml) is administered at a rate of 4 ml/s, followed by a 20 ml saline flush. The diagnostic scan is automatically triggered when enhancement in the monitoring region of interest (ROI) reaches a threshold of 100 HU, with a fixed transit delay time (TDT) of 5 seconds.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Optimized CTPA Protocol

CTPA scans are performed on a 128-slice CT scanner using the bolus tracking technique. Non-ionic contrast medium (370 mgI/ml) is administered at a rate of 4 ml/s, followed by a 20 ml saline flush. The diagnostic scan is automatically triggered when enhancement in the monitoring region of interest (ROI) reaches a threshold of 100 HU, with a fixed transit delay time (TDT) of 5 seconds.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients scheduled for a Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA) examination.
* Provision of written informed consent by the subject, guardian, or medical specialist.
* Patients with an upper extremity intravenous (IV) line using a 16-20 gauge cannula.
* Patients with a stable heart rate between 60 and 120 beats per minute (bpm).

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy, breastfeeding, or use of non-reliable methods of contraception.
* Patients with impaired renal function, including acute kidney injury or chronic kidney disease (CKD) with an eGFR less than 30 mL/min/1.73m².
* Patients with a lower extremity IV line, as this bypasses the Superior Vena Cava (SVC) and results in bolus tracking technique failure.
* Patients with a heart rate lower than 60 bpm or higher than 120 bpm.
* Patients with a cannula size of 22g or smaller, as it cannot accommodate the high flow rate (4 mL/s) required by the power injector.
* Patients with severe cardiac impairment or congenital heart disease.
* Patients with a Body Mass Index (BMI) exceeding 35 kg/m², as severe obesity causes beam hardening effects that degrade image quality.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Queen Elizabeth, Malaysia

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

MOHD ARI-NADZAHARI BIN ABD RAHMAN

Diagnostic Radiographer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kamarul Amin. bin Abdullah @ Abu Bakar., Assoc. Prof. Ts. Dr.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Queen Elizabeth

Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Malaysia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NMRR-20-699-54086 (IIR)

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Adjust-Unlikely PE
NCT05708794 COMPLETED
Detection of Pulmonary Embolism With CECT
NCT00351754 COMPLETED PHASE4