ProLARS Trial: Prospective Longitudinal Follow-up of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) and COREFO Score After Rectum Surgery in Patients Undergoing Upfront Surgery or Different Neo-adjuvant Treatment Regimens
NCT ID: NCT07339904
Last Updated: 2026-01-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-08-26
2029-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The investigators aim to investigate the incidence and evolution of functional bowel complaints in function of different neoadjuvant treatment regimens, type of surgery and adjuvant therapy in patients who undergo surgery for rectal cancer. The investigators focus on following objectives: evolution of LARS- and COREFO-scores per treatment regimen and their impact on work incapacity; identification of possible risk factors potentially related to functional outcome; monitoring and treatment of LARS.
METHODS This will be a multicentre prospective interventional study. The study population will consist of adult patients with rectal cancer, regardless of any neo-adjuvant therapy. Patients will be included for 5 years with a 2 year postoperative follow-up. Interim analysis will be made after 2 years of inclusion. Patients with intellectual disability or clinical colon obstruction are excluded. Automated online questionnaires including LARS and COREFO scores, incapacity for work and defecation quality will be sent at different time points (figure 1) using REDCap.
RESULTS and CONCLUSIONS Longitudinal change of LARS- and COREFO-scores will be visually summarized. Patient, disease or procedure specific risk factors will be assessed as well.
LARS is proven to be the principal postoperative problem after rectal surgery. If the investigators can predict the severity of LARS (minor or major LARS), this can be extremely helpful in deciding whether to perform a sphincter-sparing resection or a rectal amputation instead. Furthermore, the investigators want to offer perspective to patients who are susceptible to a disturbed postoperative bowel function.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
International Low Anterior Resection Score Evaluation
NCT04040842
Validation of the French Version of the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) Among Rectal Cancer Patients
NCT03569488
Experiences and Needs of Patients, Their Informal Caregiver and Healthcare Professionals Regarding LARS
NCT04896879
Effectiveness of Sacral Neuromodulation in Low Anterior Resection Syndrome
NCT03598231
Impact of a Patient-Centered Program for Low Anterior Resection Syndrome a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT03828318
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Upfront surgery
Patients who undergo rectal resection without neo-adjuvant therapy
Questionnaire
Online questionnaire regarding LARS- and COREFO-scores, quality of defecation process, incapacity for work and initiation of treatment for potential LARS at different moments in time
Neo-adjuvant therapy
Patients who receive neo-adjuvant therapy before undergoing rectal surgery
Questionnaire
Online questionnaire regarding LARS- and COREFO-scores, quality of defecation process, incapacity for work and initiation of treatment for potential LARS at different moments in time
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Questionnaire
Online questionnaire regarding LARS- and COREFO-scores, quality of defecation process, incapacity for work and initiation of treatment for potential LARS at different moments in time
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of rectal cancer, discussed at the multidisciplinary consultation, with the intention to perform a sphincter preserving total mesorectal excision (TME) or partial mesorectal excision (PME), regardless of the need of neoadjuvant treatment.
Exclusion Criteria
* Dementia or intellectual disability.
* Patients who are obstructive and in need a decompressive stoma or rectal stenting due to the lack of baseline data as they are often admitted to the hospital in an urgent setting
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Antwerp
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Niels Komen
MD, PhD, Head of the Abdominal Surgery Department, Principal Investigator, Clinical Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Niels Komen, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Antwerp
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital Antwerp
Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
6510
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.