Effectiveness of Sacral Neuromodulation in Low Anterior Resection Syndrome
NCT ID: NCT03598231
Last Updated: 2022-03-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
45 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-05-25
2022-02-17
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
LARS treatment armamentarium is scarce and with no long-term relief, being a difficult challenge for surgeons. There is evidence showing that sacral neuromodulation (SNM) improves patients' symptoms and quality of life. However, no prospective randomized studies have supported this improvement.
This is a prospective randomized cross-over study which evaluates the effectiveness of SNM in LARS, specifically analyzing intestinal, urinary, sexual symptoms as well as quality of life.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficiency of Neurostimulation of Tibial Nerve in the Treatment of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome
NCT02517853
ProLARS Trial: Prospective Longitudinal Follow-up of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) and COREFO Score After Rectum Surgery in Patients Undergoing Upfront Surgery or Different Neo-adjuvant Treatment Regimens
NCT07339904
Pathway of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Relief After Surgery: a Feasibility Study
NCT05319054
Transanal Irrigation - Best Treatment Possibility for Low Anterior Resection Syndrome? Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT05920681
Effect of Treatment of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome After Rectal Cancer Surgery
NCT03215017
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm OFF-ON
Patients are subjected to a test phase by stimulation with an external temporal generator and, if there is improvement in their symptomatology, a subcutaneous impulse generator for sacral neuromodulation is implanted.
Once the generator is placed it will be disconnected for 4 weeks. Then it will be continued to be turned OFF for 2 weeks as a wash-out period. Then, the stimulator will be turn ON for 4 weeks and will be left on afterwards at the maximum subsensory stimulus.
Specific scales will be passed after each sequence crossing.
Sacral neuromodulation
After the definitive implantation, stimulators are placed in position OFF for the first arm and in position ON for the second arm during 4 weeks.
Then all the stimulators are switched OFF (both first and second arms) for 2 weeks.
Finally stimulators are maintained in position ON for the first arm and switched OFF for the second arm during 4 weeks.
Since this is a cross-over study, patients can be randomly assigned to any arm first, but they will go to the other arm since the patient is its own control. 50% of randomized patients will go through ON-OFF and the other 50% OFF-ON.
After this cross-over phase, ALL stimulators will be in ON position until the end of the study period.
Arm ON-OFF
Patients are subjected to a test phase by stimulation with an external temporal generator and, if there is improvement in their symptomatology, a subcutaneous impulse generator sacral neuromodulation is implanted.
Once the generator is placed it will be turned ON for 4 weeks at the maximum subsensory stimulus. Then it will be turned OFF for 2 weeks as a wash-out period. Then, the stimulator will be kept OFF for 4 weeks. After this sequence it will be turned on again and will be left on afterwards at the maximum subsensory stimulus.
Specific scales will be passed after each sequence crossing.
Sacral neuromodulation
After the definitive implantation, stimulators are placed in position OFF for the first arm and in position ON for the second arm during 4 weeks.
Then all the stimulators are switched OFF (both first and second arms) for 2 weeks.
Finally stimulators are maintained in position ON for the first arm and switched OFF for the second arm during 4 weeks.
Since this is a cross-over study, patients can be randomly assigned to any arm first, but they will go to the other arm since the patient is its own control. 50% of randomized patients will go through ON-OFF and the other 50% OFF-ON.
After this cross-over phase, ALL stimulators will be in ON position until the end of the study period.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sacral neuromodulation
After the definitive implantation, stimulators are placed in position OFF for the first arm and in position ON for the second arm during 4 weeks.
Then all the stimulators are switched OFF (both first and second arms) for 2 weeks.
Finally stimulators are maintained in position ON for the first arm and switched OFF for the second arm during 4 weeks.
Since this is a cross-over study, patients can be randomly assigned to any arm first, but they will go to the other arm since the patient is its own control. 50% of randomized patients will go through ON-OFF and the other 50% OFF-ON.
After this cross-over phase, ALL stimulators will be in ON position until the end of the study period.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with symptomatology of major anterior resection syndrome (\>29 points on LARS score) including fecal incontinence, defecatory urgency, fecal fragmentation.
* Period greater than one year since the last definitive surgery (rectal resection or ileostomy closure).
* Period longer than one year in cases in which any other type of therapy has been performed for the anterior resection syndrome (for example: biofeedback, posterior tibial stimulation, physiotherapy, etc).
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with progression of the oncological disease.
* Patients in initial stage IV (metastatic).
* Patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
* Patients with known irritable bowel prior to rectal surgery.
* Patients who have undergone resection of other intestinal segments.
* Patients with systemic neurological diseases with involvement of long pathways or spinal cord injury.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
OTHER
Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona Dr. Josep Trueta
OTHER
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Franco Marinello, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebrón
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebrón Research Institute
Barcelona, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SANLARS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.