Effectiveness of Sacral Neuromodulation in Low Anterior Resection Syndrome

NCT ID: NCT03598231

Last Updated: 2022-03-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

45 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-05-25

Study Completion Date

2022-02-17

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is a complex disorder suffered by patients who undergo rectal resection mainly due to rectal cancer. It is characterized by fecal incontinence, fragmented defecation, constipation, defecatory urgency among others, which induce an impairment in quality of life.

LARS treatment armamentarium is scarce and with no long-term relief, being a difficult challenge for surgeons. There is evidence showing that sacral neuromodulation (SNM) improves patients' symptoms and quality of life. However, no prospective randomized studies have supported this improvement.

This is a prospective randomized cross-over study which evaluates the effectiveness of SNM in LARS, specifically analyzing intestinal, urinary, sexual symptoms as well as quality of life.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Sacral Neuromodulation - Interstim Therapy Rectal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Cross-over of two sequences (2x2: AB / BA)
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm OFF-ON

Patients are subjected to a test phase by stimulation with an external temporal generator and, if there is improvement in their symptomatology, a subcutaneous impulse generator for sacral neuromodulation is implanted.

Once the generator is placed it will be disconnected for 4 weeks. Then it will be continued to be turned OFF for 2 weeks as a wash-out period. Then, the stimulator will be turn ON for 4 weeks and will be left on afterwards at the maximum subsensory stimulus.

Specific scales will be passed after each sequence crossing.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sacral neuromodulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

After the definitive implantation, stimulators are placed in position OFF for the first arm and in position ON for the second arm during 4 weeks.

Then all the stimulators are switched OFF (both first and second arms) for 2 weeks.

Finally stimulators are maintained in position ON for the first arm and switched OFF for the second arm during 4 weeks.

Since this is a cross-over study, patients can be randomly assigned to any arm first, but they will go to the other arm since the patient is its own control. 50% of randomized patients will go through ON-OFF and the other 50% OFF-ON.

After this cross-over phase, ALL stimulators will be in ON position until the end of the study period.

Arm ON-OFF

Patients are subjected to a test phase by stimulation with an external temporal generator and, if there is improvement in their symptomatology, a subcutaneous impulse generator sacral neuromodulation is implanted.

Once the generator is placed it will be turned ON for 4 weeks at the maximum subsensory stimulus. Then it will be turned OFF for 2 weeks as a wash-out period. Then, the stimulator will be kept OFF for 4 weeks. After this sequence it will be turned on again and will be left on afterwards at the maximum subsensory stimulus.

Specific scales will be passed after each sequence crossing.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Sacral neuromodulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

After the definitive implantation, stimulators are placed in position OFF for the first arm and in position ON for the second arm during 4 weeks.

Then all the stimulators are switched OFF (both first and second arms) for 2 weeks.

Finally stimulators are maintained in position ON for the first arm and switched OFF for the second arm during 4 weeks.

Since this is a cross-over study, patients can be randomly assigned to any arm first, but they will go to the other arm since the patient is its own control. 50% of randomized patients will go through ON-OFF and the other 50% OFF-ON.

After this cross-over phase, ALL stimulators will be in ON position until the end of the study period.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sacral neuromodulation

After the definitive implantation, stimulators are placed in position OFF for the first arm and in position ON for the second arm during 4 weeks.

Then all the stimulators are switched OFF (both first and second arms) for 2 weeks.

Finally stimulators are maintained in position ON for the first arm and switched OFF for the second arm during 4 weeks.

Since this is a cross-over study, patients can be randomly assigned to any arm first, but they will go to the other arm since the patient is its own control. 50% of randomized patients will go through ON-OFF and the other 50% OFF-ON.

After this cross-over phase, ALL stimulators will be in ON position until the end of the study period.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

InterStim Therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who have had an anterior rectal resection with sphincter preservation by any approach, with or without preoperative radiotherapy.
* Patients with symptomatology of major anterior resection syndrome (\>29 points on LARS score) including fecal incontinence, defecatory urgency, fecal fragmentation.
* Period greater than one year since the last definitive surgery (rectal resection or ileostomy closure).
* Period longer than one year in cases in which any other type of therapy has been performed for the anterior resection syndrome (for example: biofeedback, posterior tibial stimulation, physiotherapy, etc).

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who refuse to sign informed consent or are unable to understand the study.
* Patients with progression of the oncological disease.
* Patients in initial stage IV (metastatic).
* Patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
* Patients with known irritable bowel prior to rectal surgery.
* Patients who have undergone resection of other intestinal segments.
* Patients with systemic neurological diseases with involvement of long pathways or spinal cord injury.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona Dr. Josep Trueta

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Franco Marinello, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebrón

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebrón Research Institute

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SANLARS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Transanal Irrigation for the Management of LARS
NCT05007015 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA