Interactive Online Informational and Peer Support App for Patients with Low Anterior Resection Syndrome

NCT ID: NCT04469426

Last Updated: 2024-11-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

101 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-08-15

Study Completion Date

2024-11-12

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

After surgery for rectal cancer, many people undergo changes in bowel habits, which may include the need to empty their bowels more often, accidental leakage of stool or gas, the sudden urge to go to the bathroom, and more. The term "Low Anterior Resection Syndrome" or LARS is used to describe these symptoms. LARS has a negative impact on one's quality of life, and can lead to frustration, as there is no single intervention that has proven to be effective for LARS, and each patient has to undergo trial and error to find one's solution. As people struggle with LARS, they describe feeling hopeless and isolated. Peer support is a supportive relationship between individuals who share common experiences or face similar challenges. The goal of our study is to evaluate whether use of an online peer support application with trained mentors who themselves have lived or are living with LARS will empower patients to better manage their LARS symptoms and improve their quality of life.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Restorative proctectomy is increasingly being performed for rectal cancer, allowing patients to avoid permanent colostomy. Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) refers to a constellation of bowel symptoms including frequency, urgency, incontinence, and clustering of bowel movements, that can affect up to 70 to 90% of patients following restorative proctectomy. Symptoms can last up to 15 years after resection. Currently, there is no standard treatment for LARS and management is symptom-based and reactive, rather than proactive. A recent focus group conducted at our institution among LARS patients and caregivers showed that people living with LARS experience anxiety and isolation due to their symptoms.

Peer support could be an important psychosocial intervention for people living with LARS, helping them normalize and validate their experience. Peer support refers to a supportive relationship between individuals who share common experiences or face similar challenges. This approach has been associated with positive physical and mental health outcomes for several patient populations. Our research group conducted a comprehensive review of online health information for patients with LARS, and demonstrated that existing online resources were generally of poor quality and lacked important content. With this knowledge, we created a LARS educational booklet and developed an online app containing LARS educational material and an interactive forum for online peer support. We are now in an optimal position to rigorously test the potential effects of this initiative on patient-centered outcomes.

This study is a multicenter, randomized, assessor-blind, parallel-groups, pragmatic trial involving patients from 5 large colorectal surgery practices (Jewish General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre-Montreal, QC; Toronto Western Hospital, Mount Sinai Hospital- Toronto, ON; Saint Paul's Hospital-Vancouver, BC). Participants will be randomized into the intervention group, who will have access to the online peer support app, and the control group who will only receive a LARS patient educational booklet. Trained peer support mentors will moderate discussion in the peer support forum, which will also be monitored daily by expert health care professionals. Data regarding patient demographics, disease and treatment characteristics will be obtained via hospital chart review. The primary outcome will be health- related quality of life at 6 months. Secondary outcomes will be patient activation and bowel function. We hypothesize that availability of this app (consisting of LARS information, a closed forum for discussion among peers and trained peer support mentors) improves health-related quality of life when compared to the comparison group.

Given the significant numbers of patients who suffer from LARS symptoms following restorative proctectomy and the potential chronic nature of their symptoms, this RCT has the potential to contribute important knowledge to support patient-centered care of rectal cancer survivors. The technology addressed in this study (a mobile app for information and online peer support) is readily accessible and can be relatively easily implemented across large range of geographic jurisdictions and surgical settings.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Patient Empowerment Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Colo-rectal Cancer Peer Group Patient Satisfaction Health Attitude Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Informational online app group

Participants will have access to an interactive online peer support app developed by the research team.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Interactive online informational and peer support app

Intervention Type OTHER

The app contains LARS information, bowel function diaries, and online platform with trained peer support mentor

Booklet only

Participants will only have access to the educational booklet on LARS developed by the colorectal research team.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Interactive online informational and peer support app

The app contains LARS information, bowel function diaries, and online platform with trained peer support mentor

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* underwent restorative protectomy for Neo-plastic disease of the rectum
* completed all treatment within the last 3 years
* patients with minor or major LARS as defined with the LARS score.

Exclusion Criteria

* Active chemotherapy or radiotherapy
* Major colonic resection in addition to protectomy
* Cannot be contacted by telephone
* Unable to read and comprehend English/French
* Does not have the appropriate interface to access the app
* Unable to give clear and informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Providence Healthcare

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Health Network, Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Jewish General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Marylise Boutros

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

St Paul's Hospital

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Mount Sinai Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

University Health Network

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Jewish General Hospital

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

McGill University Health Centre

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

JGH-2020-2073

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id