Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-07-01
2027-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Fungal empyema thoracis is a rare but life-threatening pleural infection caused by fungal organisms such as Aspergillus and Candida species. It typically occurs in immunocompromised or debilitated patients and carries a high mortality rate. Conventional management involves systemic antifungal therapy and surgical decortication; however, many patients are unfit for surgery due to poor clinical status or multiple comorbidities. The use of local intrapleural antifungal therapy remains poorly studied.
Objective:
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pleural lavage with voriconazole in patients with fungal empyema thoracis, both as a pre-surgical adjunct and as a palliative measure for patients who cannot undergo surgery.
Methods:
A prospective cohort study will be conducted at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Services Hospital, Lahore. Patients diagnosed with fungal empyema confirmed by pleural fluid culture or cytology will be included. Through an indwelling chest tube, voriconazole (200 mg in 100 mL normal saline) will be instilled into the pleural cavity once daily for three consecutive days. Patients will be assessed for improvement in clinical symptoms, radiological clearance, reduction in fungal load, and the need for surgical intervention. Data will be statistically analyzed to determine treatment response and safety outcomes.
Conclusion:
Pleural lavage with voriconazole offers a promising, minimally invasive approach for managing fungal empyema thoracis. If proven effective, this method could serve as a valuable addition to current antifungal strategies, improving outcomes for critically ill patients who are not candidates for surgery.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Role of Decortication in Complex Empyema Cases: Multidrug Resistance and Tuberculosis at the Forefront
NCT07167823
Thoracoscopic Pleural Lavage and Brushing in Undiagnosed Pleural Effusion
NCT06066398
Pleural Tissue Culture Versus Pleural Fluid Culture in Infected Effusion
NCT07140003
Comparison of Talc Slurry Versus Talc Insufflation: A Study on Effectiveness, Safety, and Hospital Outcomes in Pleurodesis
NCT07167992
Fluid Agitation Microbiologic Yield In Pleural Infection Feasibility Study
NCT05702580
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Standard management of fungal empyema combines prompt pleural drainage with systemic antifungal therapy and, when indicated, surgical intervention (decortication or debridement) in the presence of loculation, trapped lung, or persistent sepsis \[3\]. However, surgical treatment is often high-risk because many patients are elderly, immunocompromised, or poor surgical candidates. Even when surgery is performed, fungal empyema is associated with increased intra- and postoperative complications and prolonged hospitalization compared with bacterial empyema \[4\]. These challenges underscore the need for adjunctive or alternative strategies that can enhance pleural sterilization, control sepsis, and either avert or optimize the timing of definitive surgery.
Voriconazole, a second-generation triazole antifungal, demonstrates excellent activity against Aspergillus and Candida species and has favorable pleural space penetration when administered systemically \[5\]. Local administration of antifungal agents directly into the pleural cavity has been described in isolated reports, with encouraging outcomes using agents such as amphotericin B and voriconazole \[6-8\]. Pleural lavage (intrapleural irrigation) allows high local drug concentrations at the infected pleural surface, improving fungal clearance while minimizing systemic toxicity. Case reports have demonstrated successful outcomes using intrapleural antifungal lavage as adjunct therapy or as a palliative measure in patients who could not undergo surgical decortication \[7-9\].
Despite these encouraging findings, there remains a paucity of prospective evidence evaluating the efficacy and safety of pleural lavage with voriconazole in fungal empyema. To address this gap, we designed a prospective cohort study to assess the outcomes of pleural lavage with voriconazole in patients with confirmed fungal empyema. The primary objectives are to evaluate (1) the effectiveness of intrapleural voriconazole lavage as an adjunct prior to surgical decortication and (2) its potential as a palliative option for patients unfit for surgery. Secondary outcomes include pleural sterilization rates, clinical improvement, conversion to surgery, length of hospital stay, and treatment-related adverse effects. This study aims to provide clinical evidence supporting the role of local antifungal therapy in optimizing the management of fungal empyema, particularly in high-risk and resource-limited settings.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
pleural lavage group
participants of this group are diagnosed as having fungal empyema on investigations of pleural fluid before any kind of surgical intervention is carried out.
pleural lavage followed by surgery
participants of this group are managed with pleural lavage with anti-fungals and than decortication is performed.
Surgical group
Participants of this group are misdiagnosed as having bacterial empyema before surgery, but diagnosed as having fungal empyema intra-operatively or after surgery on post-operative culture results.
Decortication
patient underwent direct surgery for fungal empyema
Non-surgical group
participants of this group are diagnosed as having fungal empyema and they are unfit for any kind of surgical intervention and are only managed with pleural lavage with anti-fungal drugs.
Conservative Arm
patients are only managed with pleural lavage
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
pleural lavage followed by surgery
participants of this group are managed with pleural lavage with anti-fungals and than decortication is performed.
Decortication
patient underwent direct surgery for fungal empyema
Conservative Arm
patients are only managed with pleural lavage
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with adequate pleural drainage through an intercostal chest tube.
* Patients receiving systemic antifungal therapy.
* Patients either:
1. scheduled for surgical decortication but undergoing lavage as a preoperative adjunct, or
2. considered unfit for surgery and managed conservatively.
Exclusion Criteria
* Known hypersensitivity to anti-fungals.
* Severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class C) contraindicating voriconazole.
* Pregnancy or lactation.
* Refusal to participate.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Health Sciences Lahore
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Zeeshan Sarwar
Dr
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Muhammad Shoaib Nabi, FCPS
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Services Hospital Lahore
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB/2025/1720/SIMS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.