Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-01-10
2021-07-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study aims to better understand different recovery methods that climbers may use between climbing efforts. Specifically, the study compares two recovery approaches: electrical muscle stimulation-based recovery and passive recovery (resting while seated).
In this study, adult male sport climbers will complete a structured climbing task designed to induce fatigue. After the climbing task, participants will receive one of the two recovery methods. On a separate study visit, they will complete the same procedure using the other recovery method. The order of the recovery methods will be randomized, and there will be a break of one week between sessions.
During the study sessions, researchers will record climbing-related performance measures, simple strength and endurance tasks, heart rate, and how hard the participants feel they are working. The information collected will help researchers better understand recovery strategies used in climbing and may inform training and recovery practices for athletes in the future.
Participation in the study is voluntary, and all procedures are conducted under controlled laboratory conditions.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Different Recovery Methods on Lactic Acid Removal, Flexibility, Strength, and Endurance
NCT03563430
Recovery Kinetics Following Eccentric Exercise
NCT04733911
Post-Activation Performance Enhancement in Single and Multi-Joint Exercises With BFR and EMS in Male Volleyball Players
NCT06874829
Recovery Kinetics After Different Power Training Protocols (PTRecovery)
NCT04847427
Effects of EMS on Strength in Sedentary Women
NCT07246772
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) is a recovery modality that delivers low-intensity electrical impulses to skeletal muscle, producing rhythmic, involuntary contractions. EMS has been used in various sport and rehabilitation contexts as a low-effort method that can be applied without additional mechanical load. However, its application as an inter-bout recovery strategy in sport climbing has not been sufficiently characterized under controlled, climbing-specific conditions.
This study is designed as a randomized crossover trial to compare EMS-based recovery (EMSr) and passive recovery (PASr) following a standardized climbing fatigue protocol. Advanced male sport climbers will participate in two experimental sessions separated by a one-week washout period. In each session, participants will complete the same climbing fatigue protocol, followed by one of the two recovery conditions, with the order of recovery methods randomized.
The fatigue protocol consists of repeated climbing bouts performed on a standardized training wall using a fixed route of defined difficulty. This protocol is intended to elicit localized forearm fatigue under reproducible conditions. Following completion of the fatigue protocol, participants will undergo either EMS applied to the forearm muscles for a fixed duration or passive recovery involving seated rest without additional intervention.
Climbing-related performance measures, muscular endurance tasks, cardiovascular responses, and ratings of perceived exertion will be recorded at predefined time points before and after the recovery period. These measurements are included to characterize physiological and performance-related responses associated with each recovery condition.
The crossover design allows each participant to serve as their own control, thereby reducing inter-individual variability and enabling a direct comparison of recovery approaches under standardized conditions.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
EMS Recovery (EMSr) Arm
Participants completed a standardized climbing fatigue protocol consisting of 15 sets of 1-minute climbs followed by 1-minute rest on a TensionBoard route (IRCRA grade 15). Immediately after the fatigue protocol, participants underwent Electrical Muscle Stimulation-based Recovery (EMSr). EMS was applied to the forearm flexor muscles (flexor carpi radialis, palmaris longus, flexor carpi ulnaris) using a Chattanooga Wireless Professional 4CH device with 5×5 cm electrodes. The "Active Recovery" program (2-4-6-5-4-3-2-1 Hz; 50 minutes) was used. Stimulation intensity was individually adjusted to elicit visible muscle contraction without discomfort.The EMSr intervention was designed to facilitate local muscle recovery, maintain climbing-specific performance (total move count, isometric hang time), and reduce performance decrements compared to passive rest.
Electrical Muscle Stimulation
This intervention specifically targets the forearm flexor muscles (flexor carpi radialis, palmaris longus, flexor carpi ulnaris) using low-frequency electrical stimulation to promote local muscle recovery after climbing-induced fatigue. The protocol uses a 50-minute "Active Recovery" program (2-4-6-5-4-3-2-1 Hz) applied via a device, with intensity individually adjusted to elicit visible muscle contraction without discomfort. Unlike general active recovery or passive rest, this intervention provides localized neuromuscular stimulation designed to preserve climbing-specific performance metrics such as total move count and weighted isometric hang time.
Passive Recovery (PASr) Arm
Participants completed the same standardized climbing fatigue protocol (15 × 1-minute climbs with 1-minute rest on a TensionBoard route, IRCRA grade 15). Immediately after the fatigue protocol, participants underwent passive recovery (PASr), consisting of 50 minutes of seated rest. No active muscle stimulation or exercise was performed during this period.
The PASr arm serves as a control condition to evaluate the effects of EMS-based recovery on climbing-specific performance metrics.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Electrical Muscle Stimulation
This intervention specifically targets the forearm flexor muscles (flexor carpi radialis, palmaris longus, flexor carpi ulnaris) using low-frequency electrical stimulation to promote local muscle recovery after climbing-induced fatigue. The protocol uses a 50-minute "Active Recovery" program (2-4-6-5-4-3-2-1 Hz) applied via a device, with intensity individually adjusted to elicit visible muscle contraction without discomfort. Unlike general active recovery or passive rest, this intervention provides localized neuromuscular stimulation designed to preserve climbing-specific performance metrics such as total move count and weighted isometric hang time.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* At least 3 years of continuous climbing experience, training 3-4 times per week.
* Ability to climb at least IRCRA grade 15 (French 6a) routes.
* In good general health and able to safely perform high-intensity climbing.
* Willing to provide written informed consent and follow study instructions.
Exclusion Criteria
* Any injury, medical condition, or musculoskeletal problem that limits climbing performance.
* Use of medications or supplements that could affect muscle performance or recovery.
* Inability to comply with study procedures, including the climbing and recovery protocols.
18 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Akdeniz University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Akdeniz University Faculty of Sport Sciences
Antalya, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TSA-2019-4786
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.