Additional Effects of Thoracic Spine Mobilization Combined With Glenohumeral Joint Mobilization on Pain, Range of Motion, and Functional Disability in Adhesive Capsulitis

NCT ID: NCT07328295

Last Updated: 2026-01-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

34 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-15

Study Completion Date

2026-01-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Adhesive capsulitis is a debilitating shoulder condition characterized by pain, restricted range of motion (ROM), and significant functional limitations. Conventional treatment primarily targets the glenohumeral joint, often neglecting the role of regional interdependence, particularly the thoracic spine's influence on shoulder mobility. Emerging evidence suggests that thoracic spine mobility plays a crucial role in optimizing shoulder mechanics, yet its therapeutic application in adhesive capsulitis remains underexplored. This study aims to investigate the additional effects of thoracic spine mobilization combined with glenohumeral joint mobilization, providing a more comprehensive rehabilitation approach to enhance pain relief, ROM, and functional outcomes.

A randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted over one year at the Rehabilitation Department of Fauji Foundation Hospital (FFH) after obtaining ethical approval. Participants diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis will be selected through non-probability purposive sampling based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Subjects will be randomly assigned to either the experimental group receiving thoracic spine mobilization alongside glenohumeral joint mobilization or the control group receiving glenohumeral joint mobilization alone. Randomization will be conducted using the coin toss method and block randomization to ensure balanced subject distribution.

Outcome measures include the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) for pain assessment, the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) for functional disability evaluation, and a goniometer for ROM measurement. Baseline and post-treatment scores will be statistically analyzed using SPSS to determine intervention effectiveness. By integrating thoracic spine mobilization into standard treatment, this study seeks to refine clinical rehabilitation protocols, improve functional recovery, and enhance patient outcomes. Findings may contribute to evidence-based practice, supporting the inclusion of thoracic spine mobilization in treatment guidelines for adhesive capsulitis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Adhesive capsulitis, widely known as frozen shoulder, is a progressive musculoskeletal condition characterized by shoulder pain, restricted range of motion (ROM), and marked functional limitations. Traditional treatment approaches have largely focused on mobilization techniques directed at the glenohumeral joint, aiming to reduce capsular tightness and restore movement. While this is effective to some degree, it does not fully address the concept of regional interdependence, where dysfunction in adjacent regions, particularly the thoracic spine, may influence shoulder function. The thoracic spine plays a vital role in maintaining optimal shoulder kinematics by supporting scapular positioning, facilitating overhead motion, and reducing compensatory stress on the glenohumeral joint. Stiffness or hypomobility in this region may therefore perpetuate pain and mechanical restriction in adhesive capsulitis. Treatment strategies that combine glenohumeral joint mobilization with thoracic spine mobilization have the potential to provide superior outcomes compared to conventional therapy alone. Thoracic mobilization techniques, including central and unilateral posterior-anterior glides, enhance spinal extension and rotation, indirectly improving scapular mobility and shoulder elevation. When paired with targeted glenohumeral mobilizations such as anterior, posterior, and inferior glides, patients may experience greater improvements in pain relief, ROM, and functional ability. These three variables-pain, ROM, and functional disability-are critical in determining treatment effectiveness. By incorporating thoracic mobilization into standard rehabilitation, clinicians may adopt a more holistic approach that enhances recovery, promotes long-term function, and improves the quality of life for individuals with adhesive capsulitis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Adhesive Capsulitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

no masking

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Thoracic spine mobilization with Glenohumeral joint mobilization

Participant receive Thoracic spine mobilization with Glenohumeral joint mobilization to enhance shoulder mechanics and outcomes

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Thoracic spine mobilization with Glenohumeral joint mobilization

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Thoracic spine mobilization: Central posterior-anterior (PA) oscillatory mobilizations in prone position; 30 repetitions per set, with a 1-minute rest between 2 sets.

Glenohumeral joint mobilization: Oscillatory techniques, 2-3 oscillations per second for 30 seconds, repeated for 5 sets.

Glenohumeral joint mobilization

Participant receive Glenohumeral joint mobilization only to enhance shoulder mechanics and outcomes

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Glenohumeral joint mobilization only

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Glenohumeral joint mobilization only Technique: Oscillatory mobilizations, 2-3 oscillations per second for 30 seconds, repeated for 5 sets.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Thoracic spine mobilization with Glenohumeral joint mobilization

Thoracic spine mobilization: Central posterior-anterior (PA) oscillatory mobilizations in prone position; 30 repetitions per set, with a 1-minute rest between 2 sets.

Glenohumeral joint mobilization: Oscillatory techniques, 2-3 oscillations per second for 30 seconds, repeated for 5 sets.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Glenohumeral joint mobilization only

Glenohumeral joint mobilization only Technique: Oscillatory mobilizations, 2-3 oscillations per second for 30 seconds, repeated for 5 sets.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* • Both male and female patients with a primary complaint of unilateral or bilateral shoulder pain

* Pain has persisted for at least 3 to 4 months
* Decreased shoulder ROM observed, including external shoulder rotation, abduction, internal rotation, and flexion
* Age range between 40 to 65 years
* Diagnosed with stage 2nd or 3rd of the disease.

Exclusion Criteria

* • Patients if they had any shoulder pain resulting from systematic disease such as Rheumatoid Arthritis (morning stiffness \> 1 hour, multiple small joints pain/swelling) Infection, Tumors, and conditions like myelopathy (Hoffman's sign).

* Recent shoulder joint fracture/ trauma.
* Thoracic Outlet Syndrome (Roos test).
* The presence of Cervical radiculopathy (Spurling's test)
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Foundation University Islamabad

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Foundation University College of Physical Therapy

Islamabad, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Laiba Malik, DPT

Role: CONTACT

+3495049904

Marwa Asim, MS-OMPT

Role: CONTACT

+923335339457

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Laiba Malik, DPT

Role: primary

+923495049904

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FUI/CTR/2025/22

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.