Kinesiotaping With Kaltenborn Mobilization Effects on Adhesive Capsulitis Recovery.

NCT ID: NCT06699082

Last Updated: 2024-11-21

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 34 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2021-08-29
• Study Completion Date: 2022-02-21

Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to determine the Effects of Kinesiotaping with Kaltenborn Mobilization on Rate of Recovery in Freezing Stage of Adhesive Capsulitis. A randomized control trial was conducted at Habib physiotherapy complex Peshawar and Pak physio rehabilitation Peshawar. The sample size was 34 calculated through open-epi tool. The participants were divided into two groups each having 17 participants. The study duration was six months. Consecutive sampling technique was used for the selection of subjects for the study that fulfills the eligibility criteria was included in the study. Block randomization was used to allocate subjects into interventional and control arms of the trial. The first two patients who fulfill the criteria were allocated to interventional arm and the next two patients were allocated in control arm till completion of the sample size for both the arms. Tools used in this study are Goniometer, SPADI, NPRS. Data was collected before and immediately after the application of interventions. Data analyzed through SPSS version 20

Detailed Description

Human kinematics is always in spotlight and considered as a unique feature in which shoulder joint kinematics have grabbed the attention of researchers. The complexity of the shoulder joint is evident from the literature. It is having high functional demands and wide range of motion than any other joint in the human body. It is balanced by stability and mobility provided by number of ligaments, capsule, labrum and active muscles. However sometimes this balance is disturbed that results in different musculoskeletal complaints and pathologies in which one of them is adhesive capsulitis (1).The exact cause of adhesive capsulitis remains controversial.

However calcific tendinitis, glenohumeral arthritis, acromioclavicular arthritis, dupuytrens, contractures, breast cancer, cardiac issues, autonomic neuropathy, stroke, cervical disc disorders, humeral fractures, hypoadrenalism, Parkinson's disease are some of the known causes (7). It can also occur as a sequalae of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or joint dislocation and fracture (8). The evaluation of adhesive capsulitis starts from a thorough history and proceeding towards physical examination, clinical tests and radiographic techniques. The patient usually recalls a mild trauma or accident that has caused damage to the shoulder joint, as well as limited range of motion especially external rotation, sleep disturbance and pain on insertion of deltoid and unable to perform overhead activities (9). Physical examination exposes loss of natural swing of arm. Scapular dyskinesis is also noted in some cases. shoulder joint may be painful to touch and muscle atrophy can be present. Loss of ROM is seen (9). Fasting blood sugar is performed in patients having diabetes mellitus. Since inflammation is its feature so erythrocyte sedimentation rate is suggested. Some special tests are also positive in this condition that are Neer impingement sign and Hawkin's-Kneddy. These tests are positive due to capsular stretch and internal impingement that occurs in this condition simultaneously but due to adhesive capsulitis (10). Adhesive capsulitis can be diagnosed using imaging studies like radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, arthrography, ultrasound, and nuclear medicine. Magnetic resonance imaging is considered the gold standard due to its soft tissue visualization and scanning capabilities. However, some studies suggest that it may not accurately diagnose the condition due to the similar thickness of the Page 3 of 11 (Draft) coracohumeral ligament (10 11). Rahee Mulmulay and Himanshu Pathak et al describes kinesiotaping along with Kaltenborn mobilization and Kaltenborn mobilization alone on pain, range of motion and functional disability in patients with adhesive capsulitis is effective treatment to significant improvement in terms of pain, range of motion and functional disability (12). Literature review: A systematic and evidence based search of relevant literature was performed by utilizing PubMed and Google Scholar as search engines and the key words used were Kinesiotaping, mobilization, Kaltenborn mobilization, adhesive capsulitis, frozen shoulder conventional physical therapy, freezing stage. The purpose of the literature review is to find out the pre-existing literature regarding the Kinesiotaping with Kaltenborn mobalization effects on adhesive capsulitis recovery. In 2017 a randomized controlled trial conducted by Rahee Mulmulay and Himanshu Pathak et al on effectiveness of kinesiotaping along with kaltenborn mobilization and kaltenborn mobilization alone on pain, range of motion and functional disability in patients with adhesive capsulitis stated that there is significance improvement in terms of pain, range of motion and functional disability (12). In 2019 a randomized controlled trial conducted by Sumit Raghav et in India on effectiveness of Mulligan versus Kaltenborn mobilization in the management of adhesive capsulitis. The results of the study showed significant improvement in terms of pain, range of motion and functional disability (13).

Conditions

Adhesive Capsulitis of Shoulder

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: SINGLE

Study Groups

Experimental Group: 1

Experimental group was treated with kinesiotaping along with Kaltenborn mobilization AP and PA glides. The treatment protocol was administered in 10 reps' and 3 sets, and AP and PA glide were given.

Kinesiotaping: First the deltoid area was dried and cleansed, excessive hair were trimmed, the KT was cut into Y-shape and I- shape, after that whole length of the thumb was used to stretch the tape for about 15% to 25% and then from 25% to 50%. The tape was rubbed vigorously for few seconds, heat activates glue. The whole procedure takes about 15 to 20 minutes.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

KinesioTaping and Keltonborn Mobilization

Intervention Type: OTHER

Experimental group was treated with kinesiotape and kaltenborn mobilization while the non experimental group was treated with conventional therapy along with kaltenborn mobilization.

Control Group: 2

Control was treated with Kaltenborn mobilization AP and PA glides along with conservative treatment and Home plane exercises.

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

KinesioTaping and Keltonborn Mobilization

Intervention Type: OTHER

Experimental group was treated with kinesiotape and kaltenborn mobilization while the non experimental group was treated with conventional therapy along with kaltenborn mobilization.

Interventions

KinesioTaping and Keltonborn Mobilization

Experimental group was treated with kinesiotape and kaltenborn mobilization while the non experimental group was treated with conventional therapy along with kaltenborn mobilization.

Intervention Type: OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Conventional Therapy with Keltonborn Mobilization

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Both genders male and female.
• Age 35-60 years.
• Acute shoulder pain (10 to 36 weeks).
• Patients with diabetes mellitus.
• Referred and diagnose patients

Exclusion Criteria

• Any fracture related to the shoulder joint.
• Post operative case and osteoporotic.
• Shoulder with manipulation under anesthesia.
• Steroid injection therapy
• Diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis
• Neurological deficits / Hemiplegics

• Minimum Eligible Age: 35 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 60 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Riphah International University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Lal Gul Khan, MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Riphah International University

Locations

Riphah International University

Islamabad, Federal, Pakistan

Countries

Pakistan

References

Hsu JE, Anakwenze OA, Warrender WJ, Abboud JA. Current review of adhesive capsulitis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Apr;20(3):502-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.08.023. Epub 2010 Dec 16. No abstract available.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 21167743 (View on PubMed)

Cohen C, Ejnisman B. Epidemiology of frozen shoulder. Shoulder stiffness: Springer; 2015. p. 21-30.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Kingston K, Curry EJ, Galvin JW, Li X. Shoulder adhesive capsulitis: epidemiology and predictors of surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Aug;27(8):1437-1443. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 May 25.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 29807717 (View on PubMed)

Gaspar PD, Willis FB. Adhesive capsulitis and dynamic splinting: a controlled, cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Sep 7;10:111. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-111.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 19735563 (View on PubMed)

White D, Choi H, Peloquin C, Zhu Y, Zhang Y. Secular trend of adhesive capsulitis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63(11):1571-5. doi: 10.1002/acr.20590.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 22034118 (View on PubMed)

Malavolta EA, Gracitelli MEC, Ribeiro Pinto GM, Freire da Silveira AZ, Assuncao JH, Ferreira Neto AA. Asian ethnicity: a risk factor for adhesive capsulitis? Rev Bras Ortop. 2018 Feb 23;53(5):602-606. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2018.02.004. eCollection 2018 Sep-Oct.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 30258826 (View on PubMed)

Wang K, Ho V, Hunter-Smith DJ, Beh PS, Smith KM, Weber AB. Risk factors in idiopathic adhesive capsulitis: a case control study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Jul;22(7):e24-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.10.049. Epub 2013 Jan 24.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 23352186 (View on PubMed)

Robinson CM, Seah KT, Chee YH, Hindle P, Murray IR. Frozen shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Jan;94(1):1-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B1.27093.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 22219239 (View on PubMed)

Struyf F, Meeus M. Current evidence on physical therapy in patients with adhesive capsulitis: what are we missing? Clin Rheumatol. 2014 May;33(5):593-600. doi: 10.1007/s10067-013-2464-3. Epub 2013 Dec 28.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 24374758 (View on PubMed)

Harris G, Bou-Haidar P, Harris C. Adhesive capsulitis: review of imaging and treatment. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2013 Dec;57(6):633-43. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12111. Epub 2013 Sep 10.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 24283550 (View on PubMed)

Song KD, Kwon JW, Yoon YC, Choi SH. Indirect MR arthrographic findings of adhesive capsulitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Dec;197(6):W1105-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.6099.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 22109326 (View on PubMed)

Pathak RMaH. Effect Of Kinesiotaping Along With Kalternborn Mobilization In Patients With Sub Acute Adhesive Capsulitis. International Journal of Current Advanced Research. 2017;Vol 6(Issue 12):8489-98.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Ragav S, Singh A. Comparison of Effectiveness of Mulligan ‗MWM'Technique versus Kaltenborn Mobilization Technique on Pain and End Range of Motion in Patients with Adhesive Capsulitis of Shoulder Joint: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Exercise Science & Physiotherapy Vol. 2019;15(1).

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

RiphahIU Neelo Gul

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id