Azelaic Acid 20% vs Hydroquinone 4% in Epidermal Melasma

NCT ID: NCT07327983

Last Updated: 2026-01-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

146 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-05-04

Study Completion Date

2025-11-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Melasma is a common skin condition that causes dark patches on the face and can significantly affect quality of life. This study compared two commonly used topical treatments, 20% azelaic acid and 4% hydroquinone, in adults with epidermal melasma.

Participants with epidermal melasma were randomly assigned to receive either azelaic acid 20% or hydroquinone 4% for a period of 12 weeks. The severity of melasma was assessed at baseline and monthly using the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) score. Side effects such as irritation, redness, burning, itching, and dryness were also monitored throughout the study.

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of azelaic acid and hydroquinone in reducing melasma severity and to determine whether azelaic acid can be used as a safe alternative to hydroquinone.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This randomized controlled trial was conducted in the Dermatology Department of Gujranwala Medical College Hospital, Gujranwala, from 4 May 2025 to 3 August 2025. The study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of topical 20% azelaic acid and 4% hydroquinone in the treatment of epidermal melasma.

A total of 146 patients with clinically diagnosed epidermal melasma confirmed by Wood's lamp examination were enrolled. Patients of any age and gender were eligible. Exclusion criteria included dermal or mixed-type melasma, active skin infections, history of keloid formation, recent use of other depigmenting agents, photosensitive disorders, pregnancy or lactation, and refusal to provide written informed consent.

After obtaining informed consent, participants were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups in a parallel design. Group A received topical azelaic acid 20%, and Group B received topical hydroquinone 4%. Participants were blinded to their treatment allocation, while treating clinicians and research staff were aware of the assigned treatment. The statistician analyzing the data was blinded to group allocation.

Both treatments were administered for a duration of 12 weeks. Participants were evaluated at baseline and then monthly. All participants were advised to use broad-spectrum sunscreen throughout the study period. Treatment compliance and adverse effects were assessed at each follow-up visit. Any adverse effects such as erythema, burning, itching, or dryness were managed with supportive care, including emollients or antihistamines if required.

The primary outcome measure was treatment efficacy, assessed by the change in Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) score from baseline to the end of the 12-week treatment period. Secondary outcomes included the rate of improvement over time and the safety and tolerability of both treatments.

MASI scoring was performed using a standardized method that evaluates the area of involvement, darkness, and homogeneity of melasma across four facial regions: forehead, right malar region, left malar region, and chin. Clinical photographs were also obtained to support clinical assessment.

Data were analyzed using statistical software. Quantitative variables were summarized as means and standard deviations, and qualitative variables as frequencies and percentages. Between-group comparisons of MASI scores were performed using independent-samples t-tests, with a p-value of less than 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Melasma Melasma (Facial Melasma)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Participants were randomly assigned to one of two parallel groups to receive either topical 20% azelaic acid or topical 4% hydroquinone for 12 weeks.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Participants were blinded to treatment allocation. Treating clinicians and study staff were aware of group assignments. The statistician analyzing the data received coded datasets and was blinded to treatment allocation.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

GroupA

Subjects were randomised into two intervention groups of 73 each by paralel assignment .

Group A (Azelaic Acid 20%) Description Group A Participants were assigned to 20%Azalic acid daily application for 12weeks as intervention for treatment of Melasma.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Topical Azelaic Acid 20% Cream

Intervention Type DRUG

Topical azelaic acid 20% cream was applied in intervention group to affected facial areas once daily for 12 weeks. The intervention is used to reduce hyperpigmentation in patients with melasma.

GroupB

Group B (Hydroquinone 4%) Description the other grouphad also 73 participants.They were assigned to 4%Hydroquinone daily application for 12 as intervention for treatment of Melasma.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Topical 4% hydroquinone cream

Intervention Type DRUG

The other intervention isTopical application of hydroquinone 4% cream to affected facial areas once daily for 12 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Topical Azelaic Acid 20% Cream

Topical azelaic acid 20% cream was applied in intervention group to affected facial areas once daily for 12 weeks. The intervention is used to reduce hyperpigmentation in patients with melasma.

Intervention Type DRUG

Topical 4% hydroquinone cream

The other intervention isTopical application of hydroquinone 4% cream to affected facial areas once daily for 12 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with clinically diagnosed epidermal melasma confirmed by Wood's lamp examination
* Male or female participants of any age
* Willingness to provide written informed consent
* Ability to comply with study procedures and follow-up visits

Exclusion Criteria

* Active cutaneous or facial skin infection
* History of keloid formation
* Recent use of other topical or systemic depigmenting agents
* Presence of photosensitive disorders
* Pregnancy or lactation
* Refusal or inability to provide written informed consent
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Gujranwala medical college District Headquarters Hospital, Gujranwala

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yasan Saaqib

5th year resident

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Gujranwala Medical College Hospital

Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB.23/GMC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.