Azelaic Acid 20% vs Hydroquinone 4% in Epidermal Melasma
NCT ID: NCT07327983
Last Updated: 2026-01-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
146 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-05-04
2025-11-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Participants with epidermal melasma were randomly assigned to receive either azelaic acid 20% or hydroquinone 4% for a period of 12 weeks. The severity of melasma was assessed at baseline and monthly using the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) score. Side effects such as irritation, redness, burning, itching, and dryness were also monitored throughout the study.
The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of azelaic acid and hydroquinone in reducing melasma severity and to determine whether azelaic acid can be used as a safe alternative to hydroquinone.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Azelaic Acid 20 % Cream Versus Hydroquinone 4% Cream as an Adjuvant to Oral Tranexamic Acid in Melasma
NCT05887219
Azelaic Acid Versus Hydroquinone in Melasma
NCT00927771
COMPARISON OF A COSMETIC SERUM AND 4% HYDROQUINONE FOR TREATING MELASMA OVER 84 DAYS
NCT07071363
Comparison of Topical Silymarin With Hydroquinone in the Treatment of Melasma
NCT03982849
Azelaic Acid Iontophoresis Versus Topical Azelaic Acid Cream in the Treatment of Melasma
NCT00848458
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A total of 146 patients with clinically diagnosed epidermal melasma confirmed by Wood's lamp examination were enrolled. Patients of any age and gender were eligible. Exclusion criteria included dermal or mixed-type melasma, active skin infections, history of keloid formation, recent use of other depigmenting agents, photosensitive disorders, pregnancy or lactation, and refusal to provide written informed consent.
After obtaining informed consent, participants were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups in a parallel design. Group A received topical azelaic acid 20%, and Group B received topical hydroquinone 4%. Participants were blinded to their treatment allocation, while treating clinicians and research staff were aware of the assigned treatment. The statistician analyzing the data was blinded to group allocation.
Both treatments were administered for a duration of 12 weeks. Participants were evaluated at baseline and then monthly. All participants were advised to use broad-spectrum sunscreen throughout the study period. Treatment compliance and adverse effects were assessed at each follow-up visit. Any adverse effects such as erythema, burning, itching, or dryness were managed with supportive care, including emollients or antihistamines if required.
The primary outcome measure was treatment efficacy, assessed by the change in Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) score from baseline to the end of the 12-week treatment period. Secondary outcomes included the rate of improvement over time and the safety and tolerability of both treatments.
MASI scoring was performed using a standardized method that evaluates the area of involvement, darkness, and homogeneity of melasma across four facial regions: forehead, right malar region, left malar region, and chin. Clinical photographs were also obtained to support clinical assessment.
Data were analyzed using statistical software. Quantitative variables were summarized as means and standard deviations, and qualitative variables as frequencies and percentages. Between-group comparisons of MASI scores were performed using independent-samples t-tests, with a p-value of less than 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
GroupA
Subjects were randomised into two intervention groups of 73 each by paralel assignment .
Group A (Azelaic Acid 20%) Description Group A Participants were assigned to 20%Azalic acid daily application for 12weeks as intervention for treatment of Melasma.
Topical Azelaic Acid 20% Cream
Topical azelaic acid 20% cream was applied in intervention group to affected facial areas once daily for 12 weeks. The intervention is used to reduce hyperpigmentation in patients with melasma.
GroupB
Group B (Hydroquinone 4%) Description the other grouphad also 73 participants.They were assigned to 4%Hydroquinone daily application for 12 as intervention for treatment of Melasma.
Topical 4% hydroquinone cream
The other intervention isTopical application of hydroquinone 4% cream to affected facial areas once daily for 12 weeks.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Topical Azelaic Acid 20% Cream
Topical azelaic acid 20% cream was applied in intervention group to affected facial areas once daily for 12 weeks. The intervention is used to reduce hyperpigmentation in patients with melasma.
Topical 4% hydroquinone cream
The other intervention isTopical application of hydroquinone 4% cream to affected facial areas once daily for 12 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Male or female participants of any age
* Willingness to provide written informed consent
* Ability to comply with study procedures and follow-up visits
Exclusion Criteria
* History of keloid formation
* Recent use of other topical or systemic depigmenting agents
* Presence of photosensitive disorders
* Pregnancy or lactation
* Refusal or inability to provide written informed consent
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Gujranwala medical college District Headquarters Hospital, Gujranwala
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yasan Saaqib
5th year resident
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Gujranwala Medical College Hospital
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB.23/GMC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.