Comparison of Topical Silymarin With Hydroquinone in the Treatment of Melasma

NCT ID: NCT03982849

Last Updated: 2020-02-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

92 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-07-15

Study Completion Date

2020-01-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A randomized clinical trial will be done on 92 patients , randomly divided into two groups by lottery method to compare the efficacy and safety of topical silymarin cream 0.7% with topical 4% hydroquinone cream. Patients will be treated for 3 months and for the next 3 months will be followed up for relapse of melasma.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A comparative study done by Nofal A et al, comparing the effectiveness and safety of topical silymarin versus hydroquinone, concluded that silymarin cream can be used as more potent and safer treatment option for the treatment of melasma.8 Two different concentrations of silymarin cream (0.7% and 1.4%) were used in this study and the results showed that both the groups have no statistically significant difference in terms of therapeutic response (mean of percentage reduction in MASI was 39.21 for 0.7% silymarin cream group and 33.84 for 1.4% silymarin cream group). Additionally relapse cases were identified in 7.14% of patients in both the groups. This shows that silymarin used at low concentration can prove to be more potent than at high concentration when it comes to effectiveness, cost and adverse effects. Therefore, I will compare 0.7% silymarin cream with 4% hydroquinone cream in my clinical trial for the treatment of melasma.

Rationale of this study is to observe the effects of this alternative treatment option and compare it with the first line drug so that it can be recommended in the guidelines as an alternative treatment option for melasma. The study by Nofal at al. was done in Egypt where most if the people have type 4 skin and environmental conditions are also similar to Pakistan. However a very small population group was included in the study. I want to do the same interventional trial on a larger population size to validate silymarin as an effective and safer treatment option.

Patients attending ANTH dermatology out patient, fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be inducted. Informed written consent will be taken from the enrolled patients and confidentiality will be maintained throughout the study. A detailed history will be taken focusing on duration and onset, family history, any relation to pregnancy, effect of exposure to sun, systemic inquiry and prior treatment sought. Fitzpatrick skin type and melisma pattern will be assessed. Melasma type will be assessed with the help of Wood's light examination. The severity of melasma will be assessed using MASI score. Random distribution of patients will be done through lottery method. Group A will be treated with topical hydroquinone 4% cream applied once daily at night and group B with silymarin 0.7% cream applied twice daily. All the patients will be advised to have proper sun protection measures, use physical protection like umbrella or a P cap and a wear sunscreen having a sun protective factor of at least 60. Patients will be advised not to use topical retinoids or any other product containing peroxide in it and not to apply the cream near eyes, mouth or nose. Patients will be asked to do a patch test on volar aspect of arms for 3 days before starting the treatment on face and immediately stop the treatment and report if she develops erythema and/or burning sensation with either drug. Digital photography will be taken at baseline and after every month during the treatment course till three months.

Patients will be booked for follow up at 1 month interval for 6 months. Treatment will be given for 3 months and will be followed up for the next 3 months (during which patients will be using only sun protection measures) to observe relapse of melasma. On follow up visits during treatment period, history will be taken regarding compliance to treatment and drug tolerance. The MASI score will be calculated at baseline and each follow up visit. Clinical efficacy will be assessed in terms of percent reduction in MASI score from baseline. Any adverse effect of treatment and patient's satisfaction using the short assessment of patient\<s satisfaction will be measured at each visit. Information will be recorded on specially designed performas.

The data will be analyzed with the help of Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25. Data will be presented as mean ± SD for quantitative variables (age, percent reduction of MASI, Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction) and frequency with percentages for categorical variables (sun exposure, family history, previous therapy, melasma type, melasma pattern, melasma severity, burning and erythema). Independent sample t-test will be used to compare percent reduction in MASI score between both treatment groups at each follow up. Paired sample t-test will be used to compare the MASI score with baseline at each follow up visit within both groups. Chi-square test will be applied to compare the clinical efficacy, and safety in terms of any side effect between both groups throughout the study period. P-value of \<0.05 will be considered significant.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Melasma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Hydroquinone group

Hydroquinone 4% cream Cream applied once daily at night on affected areas for 3 months.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Hydroquinone 4% Cream

Intervention Type DRUG

Hydroquinone is tyrosinase inhibitor and thus inhibits melanogenesis.

Silymarin group

Silymarin 0.7% cream Cream applied twice daily on affecectec areas for 3 months.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

silymarin 0.7% cream

Intervention Type DRUG

Silymarin is a plant derived flavonoid, extracted from fruits and seeds of milk thistle.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Hydroquinone 4% Cream

Hydroquinone is tyrosinase inhibitor and thus inhibits melanogenesis.

Intervention Type DRUG

silymarin 0.7% cream

Silymarin is a plant derived flavonoid, extracted from fruits and seeds of milk thistle.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Female sex.
* Age 18 or older.
* Melasma of different severities, types and patterns

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant or lactating females (Hydroquinone has pregnancy category C and it is not known if it is distributed in breast milk or not).
* Ongoing use of hormonal birth control pills or any hormonal therapy (as they cause hyperpigmentation).
* Use of topical anti melasma therapy within 3 months (efficacy of current therapy cannot be concluded).

* Use of topical steroids within 3 months (as topical steroids will decrease hyperpigmentation).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Islamabad Medical and Dental College

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sumaira Abdullah

Senior Registrar

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sumaira Abdullah, MBBS, MCPS, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Senior Registrar in Dermatology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Islamabad medical and Dental College

Islamabad, Federal, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Nofal A, Ibrahim AM, Nofal E, Gamal N, Osman S. Topical silymarin versus hydroquinone in the treatment of melasma: A comparative study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2019 Feb;18(1):263-270. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12769. Epub 2018 Aug 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30146802 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IMDC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Melanil in the Treatment of Melasma
NCT01001624 COMPLETED PHASE3