Comparison of Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid Mesotherapy Versus 0.9% Normal Saline for Melasma

NCT ID: NCT04170088

Last Updated: 2019-12-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-09-01

Study Completion Date

2019-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

It is a randomized controlled trial in which investigators determine the efficacy of tranexamic acid (TA) by mesotherapy in comparison to normal saline on participants having Melasma.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In this prospective single blind split face controlled trial.Total 30 patients referred to Dermatology Ward were selected. At first, patients were examined under wood lamp for determination of melasma type (epidermal, dermal). Then, patients underwent Tranexamic acid microinjections with a concentration of TA 4 mg/ml with 0.9 % normal saline on their left half of the face and only 0.9%normal saline on their right half of the face, with mesotherapy technique. This procedure was done total of six times with 2-week intervals. Participants were assessed by Hemi Modified Melasma Area and Severity Scoring (mMASI) at start and end of the study for each half of face. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) , version 23 was used for analysis. P value \< 0.01 was taken significant.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Effect of Drugs Adverse Effects of Medical Drugs

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Melasma Tranexamic acid Mesotherapy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

individual patients were selected in study . To control over confounding factors two sides of same patient were used parallel for intradermal injection ( Mesotherapy) of tranexamic acid and with normal saline
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers
Participant do not know about the split face study. Their one side was injected by tranexamic acid diluted in normal saline while other side was injected with simple normal saline.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Tranexamic acid

Left side of face of each participant was selected for intradermal Tranexamic acid injections.

generic name : Tranexamic acid Dose : 4mg / ml tranexamc acid diluted with 0.9 % normal saline Frequency : every 2 weekly total 6 doses. Duration : 6 months

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tranexamic Acid

Intervention Type DRUG

Tranexamic acid intradermal injections were used for treatment of melasma

0.9% Normal Saline

Intervention Type DRUG

Normal saline used for comparision of efficacy of tranexamic acid

0.9% Normal saline

Right side of face of each participant was selected for intradermal normal saline injections generic name : Normal Saline Dose : 0.9 % Normal Saline Dose : Frequency : every 2 weekly total 6 doses. Duration : 6 months

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

0.9% Normal Saline

Intervention Type DRUG

Normal saline used for comparision of efficacy of tranexamic acid

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tranexamic Acid

Tranexamic acid intradermal injections were used for treatment of melasma

Intervention Type DRUG

0.9% Normal Saline

Normal saline used for comparision of efficacy of tranexamic acid

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Normal saline

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* informed consent
* age between 18 to 55 years
* bilateral symmetrical mild to severe melasma

Exclusion Criteria

* pregnancy and lactation
* history of taken any topical treatment for melasma in previous 1 month
* history of bleeding disorders
* concomitant use of anticoagulants,
* any known drug allergy especially to the study drug,
* having associated medical illnesses.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr Sana Kaleem

Department of Dermatology, SKaleem, FCPS II Postgraduate Trainee

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

rabia ghafoor, FCPS

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Assistant Profesor

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Jinnah potgraduate Medical Centre ( JINNAH HOPITAL)

Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ogbechie-Godec OA, Elbuluk N. Melasma: an Up-to-Date Comprehensive Review. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2017 Sep;7(3):305-318. doi: 10.1007/s13555-017-0194-1. Epub 2017 Jul 19.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28726212 (View on PubMed)

Handel AC, Miot LD, Miot HA. Melasma: a clinical and epidemiological review. An Bras Dermatol. 2014 Sep-Oct;89(5):771-82. doi: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20143063.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25184917 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

[email protected]

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

F.2-81/2018-GENL/2522/JPMC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id