Comparison of Intradermal Microinjections of Tanexamic Acid and Oral Tranexamic Acid in the Management of Melasma.
NCT ID: NCT07280234
Last Updated: 2025-12-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
EARLY_PHASE1
218 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-11-14
2025-05-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid Mesotherapy Versus 0.9% Normal Saline for Melasma
NCT04170088
Comparison of Intralesional Tranexamic Acid and Platelets Rich Plasma in the Treatment of Melasma
NCT05884151
Oral Melatonin Versus Oral Tranexamic Acid in the Management of Melasma
NCT07169383
Tranexamic Acid vs. Combination With Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser in Melasma
NCT03899233
Comparison of Chemical Peeling Agent With Transamine for Treatment of Melasma
NCT05362500
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
METHODOLOGY:
The methodology of this study was designed as a prospective randomized controlled trial, which was conducted in the department of dermatology at Lady Reading Hospital from 15-November-2024 to 15-May-2025, after acquiring ethical approval from the hospital. to evaluate the comparative efficacy of intradermal tranexamic acid microinjections (TXA ID) versus oral tranexamic acid (TXA Oral) in management of melasma. The study was carried out at a tertiary care dermatology center over a period of 12 months with ethical approval obtained from the institutional review board prior to commencement. Written informed consent was secured from all subjects after a detailed explanation of study protocol potential benefits and possible side effects.
Written informed consent was acquired from all participants We enrolled 218 patients, using the previous mMASI score of intradermal tranexamic acid microinjections (TXA ID) 7.62±1.64 and 8.3±1.9213 of TXA Oral, with power 80% and confidence interval 95%. Patients aged 18 to 55 years, with clinically confirmed melasma of at least 6 months duration, Fitzpatrick skin types III-V and no active dermatological conditions in the treatment area. Exclusion criteria encompassed pregnancy or lactation, history of thromboembolic disorders, use of hormonal therapies or photosensitizing medications, recent melasma treatments within the past 3 months and known hypersensitivity to tranexamic acid. Baseline assessments included detailed medical history clinical examination and standardized digital photography under controlled lighting.
Patients were randomly allocated into two treatment groups using blocked randomization. Group A comprising 109 patients received intradermal microinjections of tranexamic acid (4 mg/ml) administered weekly using a 30-gauge insulin syringe. The injections were delivered in the affected facial areas with approximately 0.05 ml per injection point spaced 1 cm apart. Group B also consisting of 109 patients was prescribed TXA Oral at a dose of 250 mg twice daily. Both groups were instructed to use a broad-spectrum sunscreen with SPF 50 throughout the study period and were advised to maintain their usual photoprotection measures.
The primary outcome measure was the change in modified Melasma Area and Severity Index (mMASI) scores from baseline to week 8 assessed by the researcher under the direction supervision of a consultant dermatologist with experience of five years or more. The treatment response was assessed using the aforementioned index as Poor response (\< 25%), mild response (25 to 50%), moderate response (51 to 75%) and excellent response (\> 75%). Follow-up visit was scheduled at 8-week interval for clinical evaluation, mMASI scoring and monitoring of treatment adherence.
SPSS 26 was used for analyzing the data. Age, duration of melasma, pre and post treatment mMASI scores were expressed as mean ± standard deviation while gender and clinical profile were presented as frequencies and percentages. Paired t-tests were used to compare pre- and post-treatment mMASI scores within groups, while independent t-tests assessed differences between groups. Chi-square tests evaluated treatment response, with p-values \<0.05 considered statistically notable.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intradermal microinjections of Tranexamic Acid
In this group patients will recieve intradermal microinjections of tranexamic acid
Intradermal microinjections of tranexamic acid
This group A will recieve intradermal microinjections of tranexamic acid
Oral tranexamic acid
In this group patients will recieve oral tranexamic acid
Oral tranexamic acid
This group B will recieve oral tranexamic acid
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intradermal microinjections of tranexamic acid
This group A will recieve intradermal microinjections of tranexamic acid
Oral tranexamic acid
This group B will recieve oral tranexamic acid
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Fitzpatrick skin types III-V and no active dermatological conditions in the treatment area.
Exclusion Criteria
2. History of thromboembolic disorders
3. Use of hormonal therapies or photosensitizing medications
4. Recent melasma treatments within the past 3 months
5. Known hypersensitivity to tranexamic acid.
18 Years
55 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hayat Abad Medical Complex, Peshawar.
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Syeda Sana Zaman
Trainee Medical Officer
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ghafoor Ullah Ullah, FCPS part 2
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
MTI-HMC Peshawar, Peshawar Khyber PakhtunKhwa 25000
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
MTI-HMC Peshawar, Peshawar Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HayatabadHMC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.