Comparison of Intradermal Microinjections of Tanexamic Acid and Oral Tranexamic Acid in the Management of Melasma.

NCT ID: NCT07280234

Last Updated: 2025-12-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

EARLY_PHASE1

Total Enrollment

218 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-11-14

Study Completion Date

2025-05-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this study we compared the effect of intradermal microinjections of tranexamic acid vs oral tranexamic acid in treatment of melasma. Given the high prevalence of melasma in Pakistan and the significant psychosocial impact on patients, particularly in Peshawar, this study will provide valuable insights into optimal treatment strategies

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Melasma appears as clearly established, symmetrically organised lighter patches that primarily develop on face areas that are exposed to sunlight. 1, 2 The mechanisms behind melasma remain poorly understood; nevertheless, it has been determined that this disorder becomes far more common among women of darker skin tones. 3, 4 Hormonal factors involving oral contraceptives, chronic skin inflammation, pregnancy and extended exposure to sunlight significantly impact etiopathogenesis as well as progression of melasma. 5,6 Furthermore, melasma demonstrates a higher prevalence among females, with studies suggesting that women are 9-10 times more predisposed to this disorder as compare to men.7 The occurrence of melasma within women during their pregnancy is considerably elevated, reaching as high as 63% . Pregnancy is a prevalent contributory factor to melasma whereas for men, the leading risk factors is sun exposure as well as relatives with a history of condition.7 Topical sunscreens are crucial in treatment of melasma, which should be tailored to achieve optimal effectiveness for controlling pigmentary disorders.8 However, it is typical for patients to apply 50% of suggested dosage of sunscreens on skin. Therefore, it is suggested for people with pigmentary conditions to use products that have greater SPF values. 9 Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a compound that comes from amino acid lysine. Hypopigmentation influence arises from its antiplasmin operation, which displays a structural analogy to tyrosine.5 The administration of oral TXA results in notable reduction in mMASI scores among patients of melasma.10 The administration of TXA via intradermal injection illustrates efficacy in managing both dermal as well as mixed variations of melasma. TXA is a reliable and usually well-accepted medication when administered at standard dosage.11 Several approaches of administration such as topical, oral, intradermal injections, and micro-needling along with different formulations of TXA, have shown promising outcomes in the management of melasma.12 Melasma is a acquired hyperpigmentation complaint that significantly influences quality of life predominantly among female of reproductive age. TXA has emerged as an effective treatment option due to the ability to inhibit melanogenesis by blocking the interaction in melanocytes and keratinocytes. Despite individual studies supporting both routes of administration however the direct comparative data remain limited. Therefore, this study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of intradermal microinjections versus oral administration of TXA in treatment of melasma which will evidence-based guidance for optimized management strategies.

METHODOLOGY:

The methodology of this study was designed as a prospective randomized controlled trial, which was conducted in the department of dermatology at Lady Reading Hospital from 15-November-2024 to 15-May-2025, after acquiring ethical approval from the hospital. to evaluate the comparative efficacy of intradermal tranexamic acid microinjections (TXA ID) versus oral tranexamic acid (TXA Oral) in management of melasma. The study was carried out at a tertiary care dermatology center over a period of 12 months with ethical approval obtained from the institutional review board prior to commencement. Written informed consent was secured from all subjects after a detailed explanation of study protocol potential benefits and possible side effects.

Written informed consent was acquired from all participants We enrolled 218 patients, using the previous mMASI score of intradermal tranexamic acid microinjections (TXA ID) 7.62±1.64 and 8.3±1.9213 of TXA Oral, with power 80% and confidence interval 95%. Patients aged 18 to 55 years, with clinically confirmed melasma of at least 6 months duration, Fitzpatrick skin types III-V and no active dermatological conditions in the treatment area. Exclusion criteria encompassed pregnancy or lactation, history of thromboembolic disorders, use of hormonal therapies or photosensitizing medications, recent melasma treatments within the past 3 months and known hypersensitivity to tranexamic acid. Baseline assessments included detailed medical history clinical examination and standardized digital photography under controlled lighting.

Patients were randomly allocated into two treatment groups using blocked randomization. Group A comprising 109 patients received intradermal microinjections of tranexamic acid (4 mg/ml) administered weekly using a 30-gauge insulin syringe. The injections were delivered in the affected facial areas with approximately 0.05 ml per injection point spaced 1 cm apart. Group B also consisting of 109 patients was prescribed TXA Oral at a dose of 250 mg twice daily. Both groups were instructed to use a broad-spectrum sunscreen with SPF 50 throughout the study period and were advised to maintain their usual photoprotection measures.

The primary outcome measure was the change in modified Melasma Area and Severity Index (mMASI) scores from baseline to week 8 assessed by the researcher under the direction supervision of a consultant dermatologist with experience of five years or more. The treatment response was assessed using the aforementioned index as Poor response (\< 25%), mild response (25 to 50%), moderate response (51 to 75%) and excellent response (\> 75%). Follow-up visit was scheduled at 8-week interval for clinical evaluation, mMASI scoring and monitoring of treatment adherence.

SPSS 26 was used for analyzing the data. Age, duration of melasma, pre and post treatment mMASI scores were expressed as mean ± standard deviation while gender and clinical profile were presented as frequencies and percentages. Paired t-tests were used to compare pre- and post-treatment mMASI scores within groups, while independent t-tests assessed differences between groups. Chi-square tests evaluated treatment response, with p-values \<0.05 considered statistically notable.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Melasma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intradermal microinjections of Tranexamic Acid

In this group patients will recieve intradermal microinjections of tranexamic acid

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Intradermal microinjections of tranexamic acid

Intervention Type DRUG

This group A will recieve intradermal microinjections of tranexamic acid

Oral tranexamic acid

In this group patients will recieve oral tranexamic acid

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Oral tranexamic acid

Intervention Type DRUG

This group B will recieve oral tranexamic acid

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intradermal microinjections of tranexamic acid

This group A will recieve intradermal microinjections of tranexamic acid

Intervention Type DRUG

Oral tranexamic acid

This group B will recieve oral tranexamic acid

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients aged 18 to 55 years, with clinically confirmed melasma of at least 6 months duration.
2. Fitzpatrick skin types III-V and no active dermatological conditions in the treatment area.

Exclusion Criteria

1. pregnancy or lactation
2. History of thromboembolic disorders
3. Use of hormonal therapies or photosensitizing medications
4. Recent melasma treatments within the past 3 months
5. Known hypersensitivity to tranexamic acid.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hayat Abad Medical Complex, Peshawar.

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Syeda Sana Zaman

Trainee Medical Officer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ghafoor Ullah Ullah, FCPS part 2

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

MTI-HMC Peshawar, Peshawar Khyber PakhtunKhwa 25000

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

MTI-HMC Peshawar, Peshawar Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HayatabadHMC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.