DEB-TACE vs cTACE in HCC After TIPS

NCT ID: NCT07322848

Last Updated: 2026-01-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

206 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-12-01

Study Completion Date

2029-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a Phase 3, open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) compared with Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization (cTACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that is beyond the Milan criteria and who have previously undergone a Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) procedure. The TIPS procedure is commonly performed to manage complications of portal hypertension, such as variceal bleeding or refractory ascites, in patients with cirrhosis. However, after TIPS, treatment options for HCC-particularly in cases exceeding the Milan criteria-remain limited and not well-defined in current guidelines.

While TACE is a standard locoregional therapy for intermediate-stage HCC, its application in patients with a prior TIPS is controversial due to altered hepatic hemodynamics, which may increase the risk of liver toxicity and compromise treatment safety and efficacy. Preliminary retrospective data suggest that DEB-TACE, which uses calibrated drug-eluting microspheres, may offer a safer and more effective alternative to cTACE in this specific patient population by providing more controlled drug delivery and potentially reducing systemic and hepatic toxicity.

The primary objective of this study is to determine whether DEB-TACE improves Overall Survival (OS) compared to cTACE in patients with beyond-Milan HCC after TIPS. Secondary objectives include comparing the safety profile, Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Objective Response Rate (ORR), Disease Control Rate (DCR), and Quality of Life (QoL) between the two treatment arms.

The study aims to enroll 206 participants who will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either DEB-TACE or cTACE. The trial will include a 24-month recruitment period and a 24-month treatment and follow-up phase, with a total study duration of 48 months. By directly comparing these two TACE approaches in a prospectively defined and randomized setting, this study seeks to provide high-level evidence to guide the optimal locoregional treatment strategy for HCC patients with a history of TIPS placement.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) TACE TIPS DEB-TACE cTACE

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

DEB-TACE group

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

DEB-TACE

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Experienced interventional radiologists perform transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting microspheres (100-300 μm or 300-500 μm) loaded with chemotherapeutic agents (e.g., 70 mg epirubicin or doxorubicin). The procedure involves superselective catheterization of tumor-feeding arteries, with embolization endpoint being angiographic stasis of arterial flow. Repeat treatments are based on 6-8 week imaging, if residual active lesions and preserved liver function are present. Treatment is discontinued upon disease progression, non-operable conditions, or persistent liver impairment.

cTACE group

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

cTACE

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients receive conventional transarterial chemoembolization using ethiodized oil loaded with chemotherapeutic agents (e.g., 40 mg epirubicin or doxorubicin) followed by gelatin sponge particle embolization if needed. Procedures are performed by experienced interventional radiologists with superselective catheterization. Repeat treatments are based on 6-8 week imaging, provided liver function is preserved. Treatment stops upon disease progression, vascular inoperability, or sustained liver impairment.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

DEB-TACE

Experienced interventional radiologists perform transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting microspheres (100-300 μm or 300-500 μm) loaded with chemotherapeutic agents (e.g., 70 mg epirubicin or doxorubicin). The procedure involves superselective catheterization of tumor-feeding arteries, with embolization endpoint being angiographic stasis of arterial flow. Repeat treatments are based on 6-8 week imaging, if residual active lesions and preserved liver function are present. Treatment is discontinued upon disease progression, non-operable conditions, or persistent liver impairment.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

cTACE

Patients receive conventional transarterial chemoembolization using ethiodized oil loaded with chemotherapeutic agents (e.g., 40 mg epirubicin or doxorubicin) followed by gelatin sponge particle embolization if needed. Procedures are performed by experienced interventional radiologists with superselective catheterization. Repeat treatments are based on 6-8 week imaging, provided liver function is preserved. Treatment stops upon disease progression, vascular inoperability, or sustained liver impairment.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. histologically or clinically confirmed primary hepatocellular carcinoma, beyond Milan criteria (single lesion \>5 cm OR ≥3 lesions with at least one ≥3 cm). At least one intrahepatic measurable lesion with tumor burden ≤50%, no distant metastasis. No prior antitumor therapy within 12 months before enrollment.
2. underwent TIPS procedure for secondary prevention of variceal bleeding or refractory ascites. Confirmed patent TIPS at 1-month follow-up with portosystemic blood flow visible throughout the shunt and Doppler velocity \> 60 cm/s.
3. child-Pugh class A or B.
4. estimated survival ≥3 months.
5. adequate organ function:Neutrophils ≥1.5 × 10⁹/L; Platelets ≥50 × 10⁹/L; Hemoglobin ≥90 g/L; Serum albumin ≥30 g/L; Bilirubin ≤50 μmol/L; AST/ALT ≤5 × upper limit of normal (ULN), ALP ≤4 × ULN; INR ≤2.3; Creatinine ≤1.5 × ULN.

Exclusion Criteria

1. diffuse hepatic infiltration, unassessable lesions on imaging, or tumor burden \>50%.
2. simultaneous portal vein branch tumor thrombus or main portal vein tumor thrombus.
3. underwent liver transplantation or antitumor therapy after TIPS placement.
4. contraindications to TACE (e.g., portosystemic shunt, hepatofugal blood flow, significant atherosclerosis).
5. presence of brain metastases.
6. Allergy to contrast agents.
7. pregnancy, breastfeeding, or planning pregnancy within 2 years.
8. co-infection with HIV or syphilis.
9. concurrent other malignancy or history of other malignancy within the past 5 years.
10. severe cardiac, renal, or other organ dysfunction.
11. active clinically severe infection \> Grade 2 (per NCI-CTC v5.0).
12. psychiatric/psychological conditions that may impair informed consent.
13. participation in other drug clinical trials within 12 months prior to enrollment.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jiaping Li

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The First Affiiated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jiaping Li

Role: CONTACT

+86 13352890908

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Jiaping Li

Role: primary

13352890908

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

[2025]634

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

DEB-TACE+HAIC vs. HAIC for Large HCC
NCT05263219 RECRUITING PHASE3
DEB-TACE for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT02748161 TERMINATED NA