Postoperative TACE(Transhepatic Arterial Chemotherapy And Embolization) for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

NCT ID: NCT02109146

Last Updated: 2024-05-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

332 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-03-26

Study Completion Date

2023-05-13

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

1. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary malignancy of liver, representing the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide.
2. Its overall dismal prognosis is a result of high incidence rates of metastasis and postoperative recurrence, in particular the intrahepatic recurrence.
3. TACE is the most widely used primary treatment for unresectable HCC. It was also used as the optional treatment for relapsed disease. However, the efficacy of TACE used as adjuvant therapy following hepatectomy remains controversial.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Eligible patients were between 18 and 75 years of age with histologically proven T1 or T2 HCC (according to the AJCC TNM Classification of HCC, 7th); an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1; Child-Pugh class A or B; no history of neoadjuvant therapy; no lymph node or distant metastasis; no intrahepatic or extrahepatic recurrence at radiological follow-up (4-6 weeks after surgery); adequate bone marrow, hepatic, and renal function according to laboratory test results. Patients were excluded if they had undergone margin-positive resections or resection of recurrence HCC; had lymph node or distal metastases; underwent concomitant ablation or radiation during surgery; were subjected to severe postoperative complications; had serious co-morbidities; had known allergy to iodine and drugs used in TACE; or if an investigator judged participation to be incompatible with the safety of the study. This clinical trial was done in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and local laws. All participants provided written informed consent. The study protocol was approved by the institutional Medical Ethics Review Committee.

Participants enrolled in the adjuvant TACE group received one to two cycles of TACE with an interval of 4\~6 weeks, and the first TACE was given within 1 week after randomization. Participants enrolled in the observation group were subjected to active surveillance without any adjuvant treatment. The TACE procedure was performed as follows. Briefly, a 4F or 5F catheter was introduced into the abdominal aorta through the superficial femoral artery according to the Seldinger technique. Angiography of the celiac and superior mesenteric arteries was performed to show the hepatic arterial supply. Then the left and right hepatic arteries were accessed by a microcatheter and intraarterial epirubicin (40 mg) and oxaliplatin (150 mg) in a mixture of lipiodol (3~5 mL) were injected. The follow-up interval was 3 months in the first two years postoperatively and 6 months thereafter. During each follow-up visit, blood tests including complete blood count, serum level of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and liver function tests were examined. During follow-up, contrast-enhanced abdominal CT or MRI scans were first performed at 3 months after operation and then every 6 months, with liver ultrasonography performed 3 months after every CT/MRI scan thereafter. Chest CT was performed at 1-year intervals. All participants with tumor recurrence were treated according to the decision made by a multidisciplinary board.

The primary endpoint was RFS, defined as the time from randomization to the first documented HCC recurrence by independent radiological assessment or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Secondary endpoints were OS (defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause), RFS rate, and safety. Patients who were recurrence-free or alive at the point of final analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up.

Intrahepatic recurrence was defined according to the non-invasive criteria of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) guideline. Newly-onset intrahepatic nodules with the longest diameter ≥ 1cm and a typical hallmark of HCC on contrast-enhanced CT/MRI imaging (hypervascular in the arterial phase with washout in the portal venous or delayed phase) were diagnosed as HCC recurrence. Lesions ≥ 1cm without a typical vascular pattern could also be diagnosed as HCC recurrence by evidence of a fast growth pattern as showed in subsequent scans and were independently reviewed by two radiologists. Extrahepatic recurrence was defined as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. The safety of adjuvant TACE was assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

After confirming eligibility by the investigators, patients without residual tumors on the CT/MRI were consented and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio into the adjuvant TACE group or the observation group. Allocation of treatment group was done with a computer-generated random number list.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Adjuvant TACE

Patients receive adjuvant Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) following curative resection of HCC.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Prophylactic Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization

Intervention Type DRUG

Participants enrolled in the adjuvant TACE group received one to two cycles of TACE with an interval of 4\~6 weeks, and the first TACE was given within 1 week after randomization.

Observation

Patients do not receive TACE or any other adjuvant therapy following curative resection of HCC.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Observation

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants enrolled in the observation group were subjected to active surveillance without any adjuvant treatment.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Prophylactic Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization

Participants enrolled in the adjuvant TACE group received one to two cycles of TACE with an interval of 4\~6 weeks, and the first TACE was given within 1 week after randomization.

Intervention Type DRUG

Observation

Participants enrolled in the observation group were subjected to active surveillance without any adjuvant treatment.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Pathological diagnosis of HCC (AJCC stage I or II)
* Without recurrence in 1 month postoperation
* Must be tolerant to TACE

Exclusion Criteria

* With intrahepatic recurrence postoperation
* Insufficient liver function
* Stage III or IV
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zhejiang University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

TingBo Liang

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tingbo Liang, M.D Ph.D

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Zhejiang University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2014-103

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.