Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
170 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-08-31
2018-06-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The DEB-TACE procedure allows the treatment to be delivered directly into the liver. It also causes arterial embolization, the process in which a blood vessel is blocked. Treatment of HCC using DEB-TACE may help delay tumor progression and can downstage (decrease the size) the cancer in order to meet the criteria which may allow patients to become candidates for liver transplantation. The purpose of this study is to compare tumor response and medical outcomes for patients who undergo DEB-TACE with standard endhole catheter versus Surefire® Infusion System.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
TACE Using Doxorubicin-eluting Beads for Patients With HCC and Marginal Hepatic Reserve
NCT02147301
DEB-TACE Prior to Liver Transplantation in the Treatment of HCC
NCT06353126
Prospective Study to Evaluate Safety of Deb-TACE With 100µ Beads in Patients With Non Resectable HCC
NCT02670122
Surefire Institutional DEB-TACE
NCT03211598
Microparticle Enhanced Cytotoxic Transarterial Embolization Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT01798134
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The biggest challenge for these procedures has been the inability to actually quantify embolization in a real-time setting to provide immediate feedback to the operator. Although various methods, such as perfusion analysis with CT or MRI, have been described, these require advanced imaging equipment/capabilities, extensive post processing analysis, and can create challenging workflows.
Currently the best results occur when the dose is delivered in a highly targeted manner into the tumor. Dense accumulation of embolic spheres or lipiodol into the tumor as documented by CT has been shown to have improved outcomes. However, with standard endhole catheters achieving maximum delivery of embolic agents is limited by the development of stasis and subsequent non-target injury.
As DEB-TACE is performed through an endhole catheter with either stasis or substasis as an endpoint. The current methodology is extremely subjective, lacks a quantifiable endpoint, and results in various degrees of embolization on patients. Often this can result in repeat procedures or the progression of tumor.
Recently, there has been FDA clearance of a new anti-reflux catheter, Surefire® Infusion System (SIS, Westminster, CO). The current design has an expandable tip which collapses during forward flow, and then dynamically seal off the vessel with reversal of flow, analogous to a valve. SIS, with its expandable tip microcatheter, has been demonstrated clinically to cause a slight decrease in intra-arterial pressure in the antegrade, or downstream, vascular compartment. Although this device was designed primarily to prevent retrograde reflux of embolic agents, the downstream blood pressure reduction may serve as a biomarker on quantifying embolization.
The goal is to develop a method that: (1) allows maximum delivery of embolic spheres into the tumor tissue to stasis without reflux; (2) enables direct real time numerical quantification on the degree of embolization; and (3) provides an intra-procedural functional parameter which could be used to guide the optimal therapeutic endpoints at the time of treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
DEB-TACE: Standard Endhole Catheter
Subjects will undergo DEB-TACE using a standard endhole catheter.
DEB-TACE
Transarterial chemoembolization with doxorubicin-eluting beads.
DEB-TACE: Surefire Infusion System
Subjects will undergo DEB-TACE using the Surefire Infusion System.
DEB-TACE
Transarterial chemoembolization with doxorubicin-eluting beads.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
DEB-TACE
Transarterial chemoembolization with doxorubicin-eluting beads.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of HCC
* Meets UCSF criteria: a single lesion less than or equal to 6.5 cm in diameter or 2-3 lesions less than or equal to 4.5 cm with total tumor diameter less than or equal to 8 cm.
* No portal invasion or extrahepatic spread on imaging.
* Child-Pugh Class A or B.
* No previous chemotherapy, radiotherapy or transarterial embolization (with or without chemotherapy).
* An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1
* A discrete hepatic artery feeding the tumor with diameter of the vessels equal to or greater than 1.5 mm.
Exclusion Criteria
* AST or ALT greater than 5 times upper limit of normal or greater than 250 U/l.
* Advanced tumoral disease (vascular invasion or extrahepatic spread, portal vein thrombosis of bland or malignant origin), or diffuse HCC, defined as 50% liver involvement).
* Contraindications for doxorubicin administration.
* Subject has a known history contraindicating contrast dye or iodine that cannot be safely controlled via antihistamine, steroids, or with any other agent.
* Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent.
* Vessels providing flow to the tumor that are less than 1.5 mm in diameter.
* Women who are pregnant or breast feeding.
* Women of childbearing potential who are not using an acceptable method of birth control (e.g., pill, patch, IUD, ring, condom, sponge, foam).
* Portal vein thrombosis of bland or malignant origin.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Surefire Medical, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
University of Arizona
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
UCLA
Los Angeles, California, United States
USC
Los Angeles, California, United States
Radiology Imaging Associates
Denver, Colorado, United States
Georgetown University
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
University of Maryland
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
New York University
New York, New York, United States
Cleveland Clinical Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
University Hospitals of Cleveland
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HP-00061366
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.