EIT-Guided PEEP Optimization in Trauma and Postoperative ARDS

NCT ID: NCT07313644

Last Updated: 2026-01-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-03-15

Study Completion Date

2026-12-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains a serious and often fatal complication in patients following severe trauma or major surgery. Mechanical ventilation is essential for supportive care in this population, but may aggravate lung injury when suboptimal ventilatory settings are applied. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is crucial for maintaining alveolar recruitment; however, optimal PEEP selection in trauma- or postoperative-associated ARDS remains uncertain. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) enables bedside, real-time assessment of regional ventilation and may support optimal PEEP titration by balancing alveolar overdistension and collapse. This study compares EIT-guided PEEP optimization with the conventional low FiO₂-PEEP strategy in terms of oxygenation and respiratory mechanics in patients with moderate to severe ARDS following trauma or surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial was designed to evaluate whether EIT-guided PEEP titration improves clinical outcomes in patients with trauma- or postoperative-associated ARDS. Adult intubated patients with moderate to severe ARDS were enrolled.

Patients in the intervention group received PEEP settings guided by electrical impedance tomography, whereas those in the control group were managed according to the lower PEEP/FiO₂ table of the ARDS Network. Other ventilatory parameters and oxygenation targets were set in accordance with ARDS Network recommendations. Supportive care and post-trial PEEP management followed standard ARDS treatment protocols.

The primary outcomes included oxygenation and respiratory mechanics. The secondary outcomes comprised 28-day survival, ventilator-free days at day 28, length of ICU and length of hospital stay, rate of successful ventilator weaning, use of adjunctive therapies (prone positioning, neuromuscular blockade, ECMO), newly developed barotrauma (pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, and subcutaneous emphysema) excluding cases attributable to invasive procedures) and changes in the SOFA score.

In the intervention group, PEEP was titrated under the guidance of electrical impedance tomography (EIT) according to a protocol:

* Preparation: patients underwent airway suctioning and were deeply sedated (RASS ≤ -3) to abolish spontaneous breathing. PEEP titration was performed using an EIT system (Enlight 2100, Timpel SA, Brazil), with a silicone belt containing 32 surface electrodes positioned at the fourth to fifth intercostal space in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
* Pressure-controlled ventilation was applied with an inspiration pressure set at 15 cmH₂O and a set PEEP of 24 cmH₂O, with a maximum airway pressure limit of 40 cmH₂O. Ventilator settings were maintained for 30 seconds with an FiO₂ of 1.0. A decremental PEEP trial was then performed by reducing PEEP in 2 cmH₂O every 30 seconds until a PEEP of 6 cmH₂O was reached or the SpO₂ decreased to ≤ 80%.
* The EIT-guided optimal PEEP was defined as the PEEP level corresponding to the intersection point of the collapse and overdistension curves.

Criteria for discontinuing: PEEP titration was terminated if any of the following occurred: a sustained decrease in mean arterial pressure of \> 20 mmHg from baseline, SpO₂ \< 88%, or the onset of new cardiac arrhythmias. If the event of discontinuation of the procedure, all ventilator settings were reverted to those applied prior to initiation of the PEEP titration.

In the control group, PEEP was set directly and adjusted according to the lower PEEP/FiO₂ table of the ARDS Network.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Respiratory Syndrome Distress Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Electrical Impedance Tomography Trauma and Postoperative Pulmonary Insufficiency

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Prospective, single center, ramdomized controlled trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention Group

Device: electrical impedance tomography system (Enlight 2100, Timpel SA, Brazil).

\- Patients underwent airway suctioning and were deeply sedated (RASS ≤ -3) to abolish spontaneous breathing. PEEP titration was performed using an EIT system (Enlight 2100, Timpel SA, Brazil), with a silicone belt containing 32 surface electrodes positioned at the fourth to fifth intercostal space in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.

Pressure-controlled ventilation was applied with an inspiration pressure set at 15 cmH₂O and a set PEEP of 24 cmH₂O, with a maximum airway pressure limit of 40 cmH₂O. Ventilator settings were maintained for 30 seconds with an FiO₂ of 1.0. A decremental PEEP trial was then performed by reducing PEEP in 2 cmH₂O every 30 seconds until a PEEP of 6 cmH₂O was reached or the SpO₂ decreased to ≤ 80%.

The EIT-guided optimal PEEP was defined as the PEEP level corresponding to the intersection point of the collapse and overdistension curves.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

EIT-giuded PEEP

Intervention Type DEVICE

Device: electrical impedance tomography system (Enlight 2100, Timpel SA, Brazil).

\- Patients underwent airway suctioning and were deeply sedated (RASS ≤ -3) to abolish spontaneous breathing. PEEP titration was performed using an EIT system (Enlight 2100, Timpel SA, Brazil), with a silicone belt containing 32 surface electrodes positioned at the fourth to fifth intercostal space in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.

Pressure-controlled ventilation was applied with an inspiration pressure set at 15 cmH₂O and a set PEEP of 24 cmH₂O, with a maximum airway pressure limit of 40 cmH₂O. Ventilator settings were maintained for 30 seconds with an FiO₂ of 1.0. A decremental PEEP trial was then performed by reducing PEEP in 2 cmH₂O every 30 seconds until a PEEP of 6 cmH₂O was reached or the SpO₂ decreased to ≤ 80%.

The EIT-guided optimal PEEP was defined as the PEEP level corresponding to the intersection point of the collapse and overdistension curves.

Control Group

PEEP was set and adjusted according to the lower PEEP/FiO₂ table of the ARDS Network

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Control

Intervention Type DEVICE

PEEP was set and adjusted according to the lower PEEP/FiO₂ table of the ARDS Network

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

EIT-giuded PEEP

Device: electrical impedance tomography system (Enlight 2100, Timpel SA, Brazil).

\- Patients underwent airway suctioning and were deeply sedated (RASS ≤ -3) to abolish spontaneous breathing. PEEP titration was performed using an EIT system (Enlight 2100, Timpel SA, Brazil), with a silicone belt containing 32 surface electrodes positioned at the fourth to fifth intercostal space in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.

Pressure-controlled ventilation was applied with an inspiration pressure set at 15 cmH₂O and a set PEEP of 24 cmH₂O, with a maximum airway pressure limit of 40 cmH₂O. Ventilator settings were maintained for 30 seconds with an FiO₂ of 1.0. A decremental PEEP trial was then performed by reducing PEEP in 2 cmH₂O every 30 seconds until a PEEP of 6 cmH₂O was reached or the SpO₂ decreased to ≤ 80%.

The EIT-guided optimal PEEP was defined as the PEEP level corresponding to the intersection point of the collapse and overdistension curves.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Control

PEEP was set and adjusted according to the lower PEEP/FiO₂ table of the ARDS Network

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Mechanically ventilated surgical intensive care patients with trauma- or postoperative-associated moderate to severe ARDS, as defined by the 2023 Global Definition of ARDS.

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \<18 or \>90 years.
* Severe acute brain injury or acute stroke with Glasgow Coma Scale \<8.
* Thoracic trauma with pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum.
* End-stage diseases under palliative care (e.g., metastatic cancer, cirrhosis, end-stage renal disease).
* Severe multiorgan failure with expected survival \<7 days.
* Conditions requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation (e.g., Guillain-Barré syndrome, cervical spinal cord injury).
* Contraindications to hypercapnia (e.g., elevated intracranial pressure, acute coronary syndrome).
* Prior use of advanced respiratory therapies (e.g., ECMO, inhaled nitric oxide, prone positioning, high-frequency ventilation).
* Pregnancy, breastfeeding, or skin lesions at electrode placement sites.
* Implanted electrical devices interfering with EIT (e.g., pacemaker, ICD).
* Known allergy to electrode materials.
* Refusal to participate or concurrent enrollment in another study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hanoi Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Viet Duc University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Nguyen Dang Thu

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nguyen Dang Thu

Ph.D; M.D.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Center for Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Viet Duc University Hospital

Hanoi, , Vietnam

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Vietnam

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Nguyen Viet Minh

Role: CONTACT

(+84) 918292528

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Luu Quang Thuy, Ass.Prof; Ph.D; M.D

Role: primary

(+84) 93608899

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Costa EL, Borges JB, Melo A, Suarez-Sipmann F, Toufen C Jr, Bohm SH, Amato MB. Bedside estimation of recruitable alveolar collapse and hyperdistension by electrical impedance tomography. Intensive Care Med. 2009 Jun;35(6):1132-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1447-y. Epub 2009 Mar 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19255741 (View on PubMed)

Jimenez JV, Weirauch AJ, Culter CA, Choi PJ, Hyzy RC. Electrical Impedance Tomography in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Management. Crit Care Med. 2022 Aug 1;50(8):1210-1223. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005582. Epub 2022 May 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35607967 (View on PubMed)

Gao Y, He H, Chi Y, Frerichs I, Long Y, Zhao Z. Electrical impedance tomography guided positive end-expiratory pressure titration in critically ill and surgical adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Nov 23;24(1):582. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-03394-y.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 39580405 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MinhGMHS 1879/GCN-HMUIRB

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Lung EIT Image Guide Ventilation in ARDS
NCT07309783 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA