A Comparison of Optimal PEEP Determination Guided by EIT and Conventional Protective Ventilation Tool in ARDS Patients
NCT ID: NCT03498807
Last Updated: 2019-10-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
87 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-04-13
2019-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
First is using the conventional postive ventilator to choose positive end-expiratory pressure(PEEP) and the new non-invasive electrical impedance tomography(EIT) guided method and evaluation the treatment outcome in moderate and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome patients by using pressure-volume curve guided and electrical impedance tomography guided positive end-expiratory pressure setting. In this project, we utilize a newly available non-invasive method- electric impedance tomography (EIT) and Protective Ventilation to determine the optimal PEEP on ARDS patients required invasive mechanical ventilator support at a medical center medical ICU (MICU) and cardiovascular ICU (CVICU)- the Far Eastern memorial hospital, Taiwan.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Comparison of Optimal PEEP Determination Guided by EIT and G5 Device in Moderate and Severe ARDS Patients
NCT03112512
Effect of EIT-guided PEEP Titration on the Prognosis of Patients with Moderate to Severe ARDS
NCT05207202
Electrical Impedance Tomography for Optimization of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure: Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
NCT03793842
Post- End- Expiratory Pressure Affect the Alveolar Heterogeneity in Moderate and Sever ARDS Patients
NCT03763890
Effect of Electric Impedance Tomography-Guided PEEP Titration
NCT05736185
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study of PEEP in the setting mode has not yet been conclusive. Currently in the clinical situation,there are several ways to choose the best PEEP mode for ARDS patients. In this study the investigators selected two best PEEP assessment methods to compare:
First is using the conventional postive ventilator to choose optimal and the new non-invasive electrical impedance tomography guided method and evaluation the treatment outcome in moderate and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome patients by using pressure-volume curve guided and electrical impedance tomography guided positive end-expiratory pressure setting. In this project, the investigators utilize a newly available non-invasive method- electric impedance tomography (EIT) and Protective Ventilation to determine the optimal PEEP on ARDS patients required invasive mechanical ventilator support in ICU at the Far Eastern memorial hospital, Taiwan.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control group_Use Ventilator P/V tool
Use the Pressure/Volume Loop
Ventiltor P/V Loop
determine the Optimal PEEP and keep 48hr on ARDS patients
Study group_Use EIT
Use the Electrical Impedance Tomography
Electrical Impedance Tomography
determine Optimal PEEP and keep 48hr on ARDS patients
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ventiltor P/V Loop
determine the Optimal PEEP and keep 48hr on ARDS patients
Electrical Impedance Tomography
determine Optimal PEEP and keep 48hr on ARDS patients
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnant
* Thoracic or spinal cord trauma
* Pneumothorax
* Hemodynamic instability
* IICP
20 Years
99 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hui-Ju Hsu
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hui-Ju Hsu
respiratory therapist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hou T Chang, doctor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Far Eastern Memorial Hospital
Ping H Wang, Bachelor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Far Eastern Memorial Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Far Eastern Memorial Hospital
Taipei County, Banqiao Dist, Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Xu L, Wang Z, Li T, Li Z, Hu X, Feng Q, Duan D, Gao X. [Comparison of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and mechanical ventilation for inter-hospital transport of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome patients]. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2014 Nov;26(11):789-93. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2014.11.005. Chinese.
Pintado MC, de Pablo R, Trascasa M, Milicua JM, Rogero S, Daguerre M, Cambronero JA, Arribas I, Sanchez-Garcia M. Individualized PEEP setting in subjects with ARDS: a randomized controlled pilot study. Respir Care. 2013 Sep;58(9):1416-23. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02068. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
Sahetya SK, Brower RG. Lung Recruitment and Titrated PEEP in Moderate to Severe ARDS: Is the Door Closing on the Open Lung? JAMA. 2017 Oct 10;318(14):1327-1329. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.13695. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
106094-E
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.