The Effects of Three Different Anesthetic Methods on Postoperative Agitation
NCT ID: NCT07304206
Last Updated: 2025-12-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
3 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-12-08
2026-02-26
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Classic general anesthesia is performed with induction using an intravenous hypnotic such as propofol and maintenance with a volatile anesthetic such as sevoflurane, along with intermittent or continuous opioids and muscle relaxants. Opinions differ regarding the effects of inhalational and intravenous anesthesia on maintenance. A 2015 retrospective study investigating the risk factors for emergence agitation after rhinoplasty reported that sevoflurane use more than doubled the risk of emergence agitation.
The use of propofol and sevoflurane for maintenance has recently been recommended due to the antiemetic effects of propofol, the myocardial protective effects of sevoflurane, and the potential for smoother emergence from the administration of small amounts of each anesthetic . This study aimed to compare the occurrence of emergence agitation after inhalation anesthesia, total intravenous anesthesia with TCI, and combined inhalation and intravenous anesthesia in patients undergoing septoplasty surgery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SCREENING
DOUBLE
Care Provider: The second anesthesiologist will wake the patient after the anesthesia has been terminated and will not know which anesthesia method was used.
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group S (Sevoflurane)
In the sevoflurane group (Group S), anesthesia will be induced with 2 mg/kg propofol, 1 µg/kg fentanyl, and 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium. The sevoflurane concentration will be adjusted to maintain a BIS of 40-60. Patients will breathe with a mixture of 60% air and 40% O2, with a fresh gas flow of 1 L/min. An intravenous infusion of 0.05-0.2 µg/kg/min remifentanil will be administered as an analgesic, maintaining a mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) of 60-70 mmHg.
SEVOFLURANE
Anesthetic management will be made with sevoflurane
Group T (TIVA)
In the TIVA (total intravenous anesthesia) group (Group T), propofol and remifentanil will be administered using the TCI for anesthesia induction, achieving an effect site concentration (Ce) of 4 µg each in the eleveld model. Patients will be intubated after muscle relaxation is achieved with 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium. For maintenance of anesthesia, the propofol dose will be adjusted with incremental titrations of 0.5 µg/mL to achieve a BIS value of 40-60, while the remifentanil infusion will be adjusted to achieve an effect site concentration (Ce) of 60-70 mmHg in the elevated model by reducing the effect site concentration (Ce) to 2 µg. They will breathe with a mixture of 60% air and 40% O2, with a fresh gas flow of 1 L/min.
TIVA
Propofol and remifentanil will be given with TCİ device for anesthetic induction and management
Group C (CIVIA)
In the combined inhalation-intravenous group (Group C), anesthesia induction will be performed using the TCI in the eleveld model with propofol and remifentanil at a Ce concentration of 4 µg each. After muscle relaxation is achieved with 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium, patients will be intubated. For maintenance, sevoflurane will be adjusted to 0.5 MAC, while the propofol dose will be titrated in 0.5 µg/mL increments to achieve a BIS value of 40-60. As an analgesic, remifentanil will be adjusted to achieve an effect site concentration (Ce) of 2 µg in the eleveld model, and MAP will be adjusted to 60-70 mmHg. Ventilation will be provided with a mixture of 60% air and 40% O2, with a fresh gas flow of 1 L/min.
CIVIA
In this group patients \<0.5 MAC sevoflurane will be used in combination with total intraveous method (This method described above )
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
SEVOFLURANE
Anesthetic management will be made with sevoflurane
TIVA
Propofol and remifentanil will be given with TCİ device for anesthetic induction and management
CIVIA
In this group patients \<0.5 MAC sevoflurane will be used in combination with total intraveous method (This method described above )
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Class I or II.
* Scheduled for elective septoplasty surgery.
* Scheduled to receive general anesthesia
Exclusion Criteria
* Known allergy to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or the study drugs
* History of bleeding disorder
* History of allergy
* ASA Physical Status greater than III
* Body Mass Index (BMI) $\> 30
* History of hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, or cerebrovascular diseases
* History of renal dysfunction
* Use of psychiatric medications
* History of substance abuse
* Patients who refuse to participate
18 Years
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Inonu University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ülkü Özgül
Prof.Dr.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ülkü Özgül, Professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
turgut özal medical center Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Inonu University
Malatya, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wolf A, Selpien H, Haberl H, Unterberg M. Does a combined intravenous-volatile anesthesia offer advantages compared to an intravenous or volatile anesthesia alone: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Feb 15;21(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01273-1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CIVIA Septoplasty
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id