Latissimus Dorsi Activity During Different Exercises

NCT ID: NCT07297771

Last Updated: 2025-12-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-10-12

Study Completion Date

2026-02-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This single-visit, laboratory study will quantify latissimus dorsi activation during standardized band/body-weight exercises commonly used in rehabilitation (e.g., standing bent-over row, inferior glide, seated press-up, body-lifting). Healthy, physically active adults (18-40 y; Tegner ≥5) will perform three repetitions per exercise with metronome-paced phases (≈3 s concentric, 3 s isometric, 3 s eccentric), 5-s rest between repetitions and 2-min between exercises; load will be individualized to reach OMNI RPE 6-8. Surface EMG (TeleMyo DTS; Noraxon) will be recorded from the latissimus dorsi (medial and lateral) and selected synergists (teres major, infraspinatus, posterior deltoid, triceps); electrode placement will follow SENIAM recommendations. Signals will be band-pass filtered (20-500 Hz), rectified, RMS-smoothed with a 100-ms window, and normalized to %MVIC using standardized MVC tests; exercise/MVC order will be randomized to limit bias. The primary outcome is mean normalized EMG amplitude per exercise; secondary outcomes include peak amplitude and categorical activation levels (low ≤20% MVIC, moderate 21-40%, high 41-60%, very high \>60%). The study involves minimal risk (possible mild skin irritation under electrodes and transient post-exercise fatigue).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The latissimus dorsi (LD) originates from the spinous processes of the lower six thoracic vertebrae and the thoracolumbar fascia/iliac crest, and-together with the teres major-attaches to the medial lip of the intertubercular groove of the humerus. Functionally, LD contributes to shoulder adduction, internal rotation, and extension, linking the upper limb to the trunk. Alongside the rotator cuff, prevention of superior translation of the humeral head may be provided by the glenohumeral adductors (pectoralis major and LD) acting as humeral head depressors via a medio-inferior vector created by their tendon orientation. From an osteokinematic perspective, LD may protect against subacromial pain by facilitating inferior glide of the humeral head on the glenoid.

Selecting an appropriate strengthening exercise is critical to restore muscle performance and functional arm elevation in patients with shoulder injury or dysfunction. The literature emphasizes exercises targeting activation of the rotator cuff and scapulothoracic muscles that contribute to functional elevation. Surface electromyography (sEMG) is commonly used to guide exercise selection and progression by quantifying a muscle's contribution across different exercises, thereby enabling evidence-based advancement in strengthening programs.

However, much of the existing LD literature centers on lateral pull-down variations, with limited data for rehabilitation-relevant tasks such as low row, inferior glide, bent-over row (with trunk flexion), seated press-up, and body-lifting. Focusing on a single exercise limits clinical decision-making for shoulder rehabilitation (exercise selection and progression). Therefore, to support a scientific, evidence-based progression for LD strengthening in rehabilitation, this study was planned to obtain comprehensive sEMG data across multiple exercises.

Aim: To examine LD EMG activation levels during different exercises and determine between-exercise differences.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Muscle Activation

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Latissimus Dorsi Shoulder Electromyography

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Healthy adults

Single-visit laboratory cohort. Physically active adults perform exercises; surface EMG is recorded from the latissimus dorsi

Exercise

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will perform six standardized pulling tasks-inferior glide, low row, seated row, bent-over row, seated press-up, and body lifting-using a resistance band or body weight. Each exercise is done for 3 repetitions with \~5 s between reps and \~2 min between exercises. Resisted exercises follow a metronome-paced 3 s concentric / 3 s isometric / 3 s eccentric tempo; purely isometric tasks are held for 3 s. Load is individualized with the OMNI 0-10 scale and increased during up to 10 familiarization reps until perceived exertion reaches 6-8/10. Exercise order is randomized to minimize ordering effects.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Exercise

Participants will perform six standardized pulling tasks-inferior glide, low row, seated row, bent-over row, seated press-up, and body lifting-using a resistance band or body weight. Each exercise is done for 3 repetitions with \~5 s between reps and \~2 min between exercises. Resisted exercises follow a metronome-paced 3 s concentric / 3 s isometric / 3 s eccentric tempo; purely isometric tasks are held for 3 s. Load is individualized with the OMNI 0-10 scale and increased during up to 10 familiarization reps until perceived exertion reaches 6-8/10. Exercise order is randomized to minimize ordering effects.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18-40 years
* No range-of-motion restriction at the glenohumeral joint
* No shoulder, cervical, or lumbar region complaints/injury within the past 6 months
* No systemic or neurological disease
* Competent to consent and provides written informed consent
* Tegner Activity Scale ≥ 5

Exclusion Criteria

* Body mass index (BMI) \> 25 kg/m²
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hacettepe University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Irem Duzgun

Professor, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hacettepe University

Ankara, Altındag, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Kubra Caylan Gurses, Research Assistant

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

LDORSI-EMG

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id