Enhancing Medial Knee Pain Rehabilitation : A Clinical Trial On The Effectiveness Of Blood Flow Restriction In Combination With Targeted Exercises For Adult With Varus Deformity
NCT ID: NCT07283237
Last Updated: 2025-12-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-09-08
2026-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Medial knee pain is common in active adults with varus deformity and limits daily and sports activities. Standard physiotherapy improves symptoms but often fails to achieve optimal muscle adaptation due to pain-limited loading. High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO) is indicated when the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle \<177° (≥3° varus), particularly with symptomatic medial OA and preserved lateral compartment. Mild, moderate, and severe varus alignments correspond to 3°-5°, 6°-8°, and ≥9°, respectively. Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) training enables strength and hypertrophy gains at low intensities by partially restricting venous flow, reducing joint stress while promoting muscle activation. Evidence supports BFR use in knee OA for improving pain, strength, and quality of life, but its effect in varus-related medial knee pain remains unclear. This trial examines whether combining BFR with targeted strengthening offers superior outcomes to conventional exercise.
Aim:
To investigate the effectiveness of BFR combined with targeted exercises in adults with varus deformity and medial knee pain.
Methods:
A randomized controlled trial will be conducted in an outpatient setting. Eighty active adults (30-55 yrs, BMI 18-25) with medial knee pain and mild-moderate varus deformity (2° \< HKA ≤ 10°) will be enrolled. Inclusion requires Kellgren-Lawrence grade 1-3 OA; exclusions include BMI \> 25, prior knee surgery, DVT, vascular disease, pregnancy, or neurological/musculoskeletal disorders affecting lower limbs. Sample size (n = 30; adjusted to 80 for attrition) was calculated via G\*Power (f = 0.35, α = 0.05, power = 0.80). Participants will be randomized into:
* Control group: Specific exercise program for hip adductors, abductors, internal rotators, and knee extensors.
* BFR group: Same protocol performed with BFR using Smart Tools Plus (LLC, USA) cuff at 40-80% limb occlusion pressure (LOP). Cuffs remain inflated during sets and deflated between them (1-min rest). Adverse events (pain, numbness, discoloration) will be monitored.
Assessment timeline: baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. Outcomes include:
* Primary: Oxford Knee Score (OKS).
* Secondary: LEFS, NPRS, SF-36, MMT (hip flexors, adductors, internal rotators), radiographic measures (HKA, MLDFA, MPTA), and recurrence rate within 1 year.
Muscle strength will be measured using a VALD handheld dynamometer. Radiographs will be interpreted by a blinded radiologist; functional and pain scales by a blinded assessor.
Randomization and blinding:
Participants will be alternately allocated (1:1). The assessor will remain blinded to group assignment (single-blind design).
Statistical analysis:
Quantitative variables will be expressed as mean ± SD and qualitative data as frequencies. Repeated-measures ANOVA and appropriate comparative tests will assess between- and within-group differences. Significance set at p \< 0.05.
Expected outcome:
It is hypothesized that combining BFR with targeted exercises will yield greater improvements in pain, function, and muscle strength than conventional exercise alone, offering a promising conservative option for active adults with varus-related medial knee pain.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Different Levels of Blood Flow Restriction Versus Moderate Intensity Exercises in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT06637124
Effectiveness of Blood Flow Restriction Exercise Therapy to Reduce Pain in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients
NCT04917952
Effect of Mechanical Traction and Therapeutic Exercises in Treatment of Primary Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT04830748
The Comparison of Hip and Knee Focused Exercises Versus Hip and Knee Focused Exercises With the Use of Blood Flow Restriction Training in Adults With Patellofemoral Pain
NCT04340453
Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Combined With Electrostimulation After Knee Arthroplasty
NCT07141316
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Medial knee pain, frequently observed in active adults with varus deformity, is a common musculoskeletal issue that impairs daily function and participation in sports (1). Standard conservative treatments, such as physiotherapy and strengthening exercises, can reduce pain and improve function, but often fail to achieve optimal muscle adaptation due to pain-limited force production (6). Common Surgical Thresholds for Varus Alignment: High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO) - most common for medial compartment OA with varus: HKA \< 177° (i.e., \>3° varus), Clinical indication often begins at 5°-6° of varus (HKA \~175° or less) with pain and medial OA, Absolute indications: Symptomatic medial knee OA, HKA angle ≤ 174° (≥6° varus), Age \<60 (ideally), active patients and Preserved lateral compartment (1). Another reference states that a moderately active individual with joint stability, between 40-65 years of age, with isolated joint line pain, body mass index \<30, mal-alignment \<15°, metaphyseal varus, good range of motion, high-demand patient, non-smoker, and with some degree of pain endurance capacity are the indications for HTO (2). According to (3) an Isolated high tibial osteotomy was done based on mFTA, varus alignment was categorized as "mild" (3°-5°), "moderate" (6°-8°), or "severe" (≥ 9°) Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) training has emerged as an innovative adjunct, enabling significant gains in muscle strength and hypertrophy at lower exercise loads by partially restricting venous blood flow during exercise (4). This technique is particularly beneficial for individuals who cannot tolerate high-resistance training, as it minimizes joint stress while promoting muscle growth and improved function . Recent evidence indicates that BFR-enhanced exercise regimens can lead to greater improvements in pain reduction, muscle strength, and quality of life compared to traditional exercise alone in populations with knee osteoarthritis (3). However, the application of BFR training specifically for medial knee pain associated with varus deformity in active adults remains underexplored. This study seeks to address this gap by comparing the efficacy of BFR-enhanced exercises versus standard exercise protocols in this population, potentially offering a more effective rehabilitation strategy.
\-
Aim:
To investigate the effectiveness of BFR in combination with targeted exercises for active adults with varus deformity and medial knee pain.
\-
2.4.1- Type of the study:
Randomized controlled trial
2.4.2- Study Setting:
Outpatient
\-
2.4.3- Study subjects:
1. Inclusion criteria:
■ Age: 30-55 years old
■ BMI: 18-25
■ Presence of medial knee pain
* Mild to moderate Varus deformity confirmed via X-Ray Long Film (2°\<HKA≤10°) (4)(4)(5)
* Kellgren and Lawrence system for classification of osteoarthritis (6):
grade 1 (doubtful): doubtful joint space narrowing and possible osteophytic lipping grade 2 (minimal): definite osteophytes and possible joint space narrowing grade 3 (moderate): moderate multiple osteophytes, definite narrowing of joint space, some sclerosis and possible deformity of bone ends
■ Active adults (on Based REFA work classification)
2. Exclusion criteria:
* BMI \> 25
* History of knee surgery
* Any contraindication to exercise or BFR (DVT history, uncontrolled hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, pregnancy)
* Other significant musculoskeletal or neurological affecting lower extremity function (hip osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, peripheral neuropathy)
3. Sample Size Calculation:
G\*Power software version 3.1.9.7 was utilized to estimate the required sample size for the present study. A total of 30 participants was calculated to detect a moderate effect size (f = 0.35) using repeated-measures ANOVA for two groups, with an a priori significance level (α) of 0.05 and statistical power (1-β) of 0.80. To accommodate an anticipated attrition rate of 20%, approximately 80 active adults aged 30 to 55 years, with a BMI between 18 and 25, experiencing medial knee pain and confirmed varus deformity by measuring lower limb mechanical axes (\<2° and ≤10° in X-Ray Long Film), will be recruited. Screening will be conducted via a detailed medical history questionnaire. Risks, benefits, study commitments, and participant rights will be thoroughly explained, with all questions answered prior to enrolment.
\-
2.4.4 - Study tools (in detail, e.g., lab methods, instruments, steps, chemicals, …):
○ Participants will be randomly assigned to the intervention and control groups using a computer-generated random sequence, ensuring allocation concealment, and minimizing selection bias.
○ Control Group: Specific Exercise Program (Hip adductors/abductors, internal rotators, and knee extensors) (8\&10).
○ BFR Group: Specific Exercise Program with BFR
* BFR Protocol Details: BFR will be applied using a (Smart Tools Plus, LLC, USA) tourniquet system, placed on the proximal thigh. Pressure will be set at 40-80% of limb occlusion pressure (LOP), determined individually. The cuff will be inflated during exercise sets and deflated during rest periods (e.g., 1 minute rest between sets). Participants will be monitored for any signs of adverse events, such as excessive pain, numbness, or discoloration.
* Study Procedures: The study will involve a baseline assessment, a 6-week intervention period, and a follow-up assessment at 12 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year (5). Baseline assessments will include demographics, medical history, NPRS, Oxford Knee Score, LEFS, QoL Measurement, MMT, and X-Ray Long Film.
2.4.5 - Research outcome measures:
Primary:
* Functional: Oxford Knee Score (OKS) baseline, 6 weeks, and at 3-months, 6 months follow-up.
Secondary:
○ Kellgren and Lawrence system for classification of osteoarthritis baseline and at 6 months
○ Functional: Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) baseline, 6 weeks, and at 3-months, 6 months follow-up
○ Pain: Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) baseline, 6 weeks, and at 3-months, 6 months follow-up
○ Quality of Life: \[SF-36\] baseline, 6 weeks, and at 3-months, 6 months follow-up
○ Muscle Strength: Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) for hip Flexors, Internal rotators and Adductors at baseline, 6 weeks follow-up
* Number of relapses in one year follow
* Radiographic Assessment: X-Ray Long Film mechanical axes (to measure varus angle) ■ The Hip Knee Ankle Angle (HKA), Mechanical Lateral Distal Femoral Angle (MLDFA) and Medial Proximal Tibial Angle (MPTA) at baseline and 3-months follow-up.
Data collection:
Data will be collected at baseline, post-intervention 6 weeks, and at 3-months, 6 months follow-up. Outcome measures will be administered by a trained, blinded assessor. Radiographic assessments will be performed by a qualified radiologist. Muscle strength will be measured using VALD handheld dynamometer:
1- Hip Flexors : Standing position and resistance above the knee. 2- Hip Adductors : Supine with fully extended and the resistance above the knee.
Supine with 45 degrees knee flexion and the resistance above the knee. 3- Hip Internal rotators : Sitting position and the resistance is above lateral malleolus.
\-
Randomization And Blinding:
Participants will be randomly assigned to either the intervention or control group using an alternating allocation method. Specifically, the first enrolled patient will be assigned to the intervention group, the second to the control group, the third to the intervention group, and so on. The therapist responsible for outcome assessment will be blinded to group allocation to reduce measurement bias. However, due to the nature of the treatment, only single blinding is possible, as participants and treating therapists will be aware of the intervention received.
\-
Statistical tests:
Quantitative variables will present in terms of mean +/-SD and qualitative variables will be expressed as frequency and percentage. Appropriate tests of significance can be used for measured variables. Significance level will be set at 0.05.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control Group - Targeted Exercise Program
Participants in the control group will perform a specific targeted exercise program focusing on hip adductors, abductors, internal rotators, and knee extensors. Exercises will be performed at moderate intensity without any blood flow restriction. The program aims to improve lower limb alignment, muscle balance, and functional performance through conventional strengthening exercises.
Targeted Exercise Program
A structured therapeutic exercise program designed to strengthen the hip adductors, abductors, internal rotators, and knee extensors. The program focuses on improving muscular balance, lower limb alignment, and functional performance in active adults with medial knee pain and varus deformity. Exercises are performed under therapist supervision at moderate intensity without blood flow restriction. This program serves as the control intervention.
Intervention Group - Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) with Targeted Exercise Program
Participants in the intervention group will perform the same targeted exercise program (hip adductors, abductors, internal rotators, and knee extensors) combined with Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) using a Smart Tools Plus (LLC, USA) pneumatic cuff applied to the proximal thigh.
Cuff pressure will be set individually at 40-80% of limb occlusion pressure (LOP), maintained during exercise sets and released during 1-minute rest intervals. The intervention aims to enhance muscle strength and function while minimizing joint stress and pain.
Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) Training with Targeted Exercise Program
Participants perform the same targeted exercise program combined with Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) training using a Smart Tools Plus (LLC, USA) pneumatic cuff system applied to the proximal thigh.
Cuff pressure is individually set at 40-80% of the limb occlusion pressure (LOP), maintained during exercise sets and released during rest intervals (1 minute between sets). The intervention aims to enhance muscle strength and hypertrophy while reducing joint load and pain, providing an effective rehabilitation approach for adults with medial knee pain and varus deformity.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Targeted Exercise Program
A structured therapeutic exercise program designed to strengthen the hip adductors, abductors, internal rotators, and knee extensors. The program focuses on improving muscular balance, lower limb alignment, and functional performance in active adults with medial knee pain and varus deformity. Exercises are performed under therapist supervision at moderate intensity without blood flow restriction. This program serves as the control intervention.
Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) Training with Targeted Exercise Program
Participants perform the same targeted exercise program combined with Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) training using a Smart Tools Plus (LLC, USA) pneumatic cuff system applied to the proximal thigh.
Cuff pressure is individually set at 40-80% of the limb occlusion pressure (LOP), maintained during exercise sets and released during rest intervals (1 minute between sets). The intervention aims to enhance muscle strength and hypertrophy while reducing joint load and pain, providing an effective rehabilitation approach for adults with medial knee pain and varus deformity.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Body Mass Index (BMI) between 18 and 25
* Presence of medial knee pain
* Mild to moderate varus deformity confirmed via X-Ray Long Film (2° \< HKA ≤ 10°) (4)(4)(5)
* Kellgren and Lawrence classification of osteoarthritis (grades 1-3) (6):
* Grade 1 (doubtful): doubtful joint space narrowing and possible osteophytic lipping
* Grade 2 (minimal): definite osteophytes and possible joint space narrowing
* Grade 3 (moderate): moderate multiple osteophytes, definite narrowing of joint space, some sclerosis and possible deformity of bone ends
* Active adults (based on REFA work classification)
Exclusion Criteria
* History of knee surgery
* Any contraindication to exercise or BFR, including:
* History of deep vein thrombosis (DVT)
* Uncontrolled hypertension
* Peripheral vascular disease
* Pregnancy
* Other significant musculoskeletal or neurological conditions affecting lower extremity function (e.g., hip osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, peripheral neuropathy)
30 Years
55 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mariam ibrahim
Physical Therapy Research Fellow, Assiut University, EGYPT
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of MEdicine, Assiut University
Asyut, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
White WL. Erratum to: Why I hate the index finger. Hand (N Y). 2011 Jun;6(2):233. doi: 10.1007/s11552-011-9321-0. Epub 2011 Mar 18.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
04-2025-300646
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.