Evaluation of Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Local Therapy for Lung Tumors and Its Impact on Breathing Function

NCT ID: NCT07272356

Last Updated: 2025-12-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

68 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-11-22

Study Completion Date

2026-06-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This clinical study is evaluating different treatment options for patients with malignant lung tumors, including both primary lung cancer and tumors that have spread to the lungs from other parts of the body. The goal is to compare the safety, effectiveness, and quality-of-life impact of three approaches: surgery, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), and minimally invasive thermal ablation (microwave or cryoablation).

Thermal ablation is a procedure in which a small antenna is inserted through the skin into the tumor and the cancer cells are destroyed using heat or freezing. SBRT uses precisely targeted radiation to destroy tumors, while surgery involves removing part of the lung. These methods are already used in routine care, but this study directly compares them to understand which patients may benefit most from each approach.

In addition to cancer control, the study is measuring how these treatments affect breathing function. Patients will have regular follow-up visits with CT scans, breathing tests, and blood draws for up to two years.

About 100 adults in Lithuania are expected to participate. The results will help doctors make better treatment recommendations, balancing cancer control with patient well-being, lung function, and quality of life.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Lung cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide, and the lungs are also a common site of metastases from other cancers such as colorectal, breast, or kidney tumors. While surgery is considered the gold standard for treatment of early-stage lung cancer and resectable pulmonary metastases, many patients are not suitable surgical candidates due to age, comorbidities, or personal choice. For these patients, less invasive treatments such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or image-guided thermal ablation may provide effective alternatives.

This study is designed to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and patient-centered outcomes of three treatment strategies for malignant lung tumors:

* Surgery (anatomical lung resection, when feasible)
* Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), which delivers high doses of precisely targeted radiation
* Minimally invasive thermal ablation, performed under CT guidance using microwave or cryoablation technology to destroy tumor tissue with heat or freezing

Thermal ablation and SBRT are established treatment options in many centers worldwide, but there is limited prospective data directly comparing these modalities with surgery. This trial aims to address that gap by examining not only oncologic outcomes such as recurrence, survival, and complications, but also functional and quality-of-life outcomes.

Study Objectives:

* To compare disease control (local, regional, and distant recurrence) and survival outcomes across surgery, SBRT, and ablation.
* To evaluate complication rates and hospitalization needs after each treatment.
* To assess the effect of each treatment on respiratory function using spirometry, gas diffusion testing, and lung perfusion scintigraphy.
* To monitor health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the SF-36 questionnaire before and after treatment.

Study Design:

This is a prospective, single-center, non-randomized study conducted at the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Clinics. Eligible patients are adults (≥18 years) with either primary peripheral lung cancer or oligometastatic pulmonary disease (≤5 lesions, each ≤3 cm in size), who are suitable for surgery, SBRT, or thermal ablation based on multidisciplinary team (MDT) assessment. Patients are assigned to one of the three treatment groups-surgery, SBRT, or ablation-based on clinical suitability and shared decision-making between the MDT and the patient.

Follow-Up Procedures:

Participants are followed for up to 24 months with scheduled visits and investigations, including:

* Clinical assessments at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months
* Chest CT scans at baseline and 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after the treatment
* FDG-PET/CT if clinically indicated
* Spirometry and gas diffusion testing at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months
* Lung perfusion scintigraphy at baseline and 3 months
* Blood sampling (up to 10 ml) at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months
* Completion of quality-of-life questionnaires at baseline and one month after treatment

Risks and Benefits:

Risks include discomfort from diagnostic procedures (blood draws, imaging, spirometry), possible treatment-related complications such as pneumothorax after ablation, infection or post-operative pain after surgery, and radiation-related side effects (e.g., radiation pneumonitis, infection) after SBRT. However, all procedures are well-established in clinical practice, and serious complications are rare. Benefits include close monitoring of disease status with imaging, which may enable early detection of recurrence and timely treatment. Patients may also benefit from comprehensive functional assessments that can guide future care.

Expected Outcomes:

This study is expected to provide comparative information on the safety, effectiveness, and impact on quality of life of surgery, stereotactic body radiotherapy, and minimally invasive thermal ablation in patients with malignant lung tumors. By evaluating recurrence, survival, complications, and respiratory function, the study aims to identify which patients benefit most from each treatment approach and to support more personalized treatment planning in the future.

Sample Size and Duration:

The study aims to enroll approximately 100 participants in Lithuania. Each participant will be followed for two years after treatment.

Significance:

This study is expected to provide valuable evidence on the comparative effectiveness of surgery, SBRT, and thermal ablation in the management of malignant pulmonary tumors. By integrating oncologic, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes, the study seeks to support personalized medicine approaches and improve decision-making in multidisciplinary care of lung cancer and metastases.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lung Cancer (Non-Small Cell) Lung Metastases From Any Primary

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Surgery

Surgical treatment with the aim of complete tumor removal with safety margins. The procedures may include lobectomies, segmentectomies, atypical resections, or pneumonectomies. The surgery may or may not include regional lymph node dissection.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Surgical resection performed under general anaesthesia, including lobectomy, segmentectomy, or atypical resection. All anatomical resections were accompanied by lymph node dissection, while atypical resections were performed without lymph node removal. Procedures were carried out via open thoracotomy, with some performed through mini-thoracotomy.

SBRT

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) will be performed with the aim of radical tumor eradication by delivering very high doses of radiation to the tumor. Dose and fractionation regimens will be individualized, with a target median BED₁₀ of 100 Gy.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

SBRT

Intervention Type RADIATION

Stereotactic body radiation therapy delivered with a Varian TrueBeam™ linear accelerator, using 4D-CT planning, daily cone-beam CT image guidance, RTOG-based organ-at-risk constraints, and individualized fractionation regimens with the aim of a median biologically effective dose of 100 Gy.

Ablation

Image-guided thermal ablation is a minimally invasive treatment aiming for radical tumor destruction using either heat or cold. In this trial, procedures include microwave ablation and cryoablation, all performed under general anaesthesia with CT guidance to ensure complete lesion coverage and adequate safety margins.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ablation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Image-guided thermal ablation performed under general anaesthesia with CT guidance, including microwave ablation (TATO2 system, single or overlapping insertions) and cryoablation (CryoCare Touch™ system, three freeze-thaw cycles). Tract sealing was performed to minimize complications.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Surgery

Surgical resection performed under general anaesthesia, including lobectomy, segmentectomy, or atypical resection. All anatomical resections were accompanied by lymph node dissection, while atypical resections were performed without lymph node removal. Procedures were carried out via open thoracotomy, with some performed through mini-thoracotomy.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ablation

Image-guided thermal ablation performed under general anaesthesia with CT guidance, including microwave ablation (TATO2 system, single or overlapping insertions) and cryoablation (CryoCare Touch™ system, three freeze-thaw cycles). Tract sealing was performed to minimize complications.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

SBRT

Stereotactic body radiation therapy delivered with a Varian TrueBeam™ linear accelerator, using 4D-CT planning, daily cone-beam CT image guidance, RTOG-based organ-at-risk constraints, and individualized fractionation regimens with the aim of a median biologically effective dose of 100 Gy.

Intervention Type RADIATION

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Lobectomy Anatomical resection Atypical resection Segmentenctomy Microwave ablation Cryoablation Stereotactic body radiotherapy Radiotherapy

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults (18 years or older)
* Verified systemic therapy-naive biopsy-proven NSCLC, stages from Tis to T2; or oligometastatic peripheral (≤ 5 lesions) lung disease;
* All lesions are ≤3 cm in size and accessible for surgery, ablation or SBRT;
* No local nodal or distant metastatic disease on diagnostic imaging;
* Documented agreement on the recommended curative treatment by a multidisciplinary team, including a pulmonologist, interventional radiologist, radiation therapist, thoracic surgeon, and oncologist;
* Documented patient's agreement to receive the intended therapy and to participate in this study via a signed informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria

* Central lung tumors (\<2 cm from the main bronchi or hilum);
* \>5 or diffuse lung lesions, or prior local treatment to the same lesion;
* Major comorbidities, physical or social limitations precluding trial participation;
* Contraindications to general anesthesia, inability to temporarily withdraw antiplatelet therapy, or evidence of severe coagulopathy.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Aurimas Macionis

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Aurimas Macionis

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Clinics

Kaunas, , Lithuania

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Lithuania

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2022-BE-10-0015

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Robotic Surgery in Pulmonary Metastasectomy
NCT06466070 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION