PONDER: Pelvic Peritonectomy in Early Stage Ovarian Tumors

NCT ID: NCT07271914

Last Updated: 2025-12-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

390 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-02-28

Study Completion Date

2032-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Early-stage ovarian tumors represent approximately 30% of all newly diagnosed ovarian cancers. Current international guidelines recommend random peritoneal biopsies for surgical staging, but the diagnostic yield of these biopsies remains limited. The PONDER study aims to evaluate whether standardized surgical procedure and pathology assessment of wider peritoneal pelvic biopsies can increase the detection rate of microscopic peritoneal implants and micrometastases in patients with early-stage ovarian tumors. This multicenter, prospective, single-arm study includes both minimally invasive and open surgical approaches, with a standardized gross and microscopic evaluation of the resected peritoneal specimens

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study focuses on the excision of anatomically defined pelvic peritoneal areas, with meticulous dissection of the retroperitoneal spaces and a nerve-sparing approach. Combined with a specific pathology protocol, this strategy improves the detection of microscopic peritoneal involvement and provides new insights into the mechanisms of pelvic recurrence

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Early Stage Ovarian Tumors Peritoneal Carcinosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Enrolled patients with FIGO 2018 IA-IB epithelial or non-epithelial ovarian/fallopian tube neoplasma

All patients will receive standard pre-, intra-, and postoperative care according to institutional guidelines. The peritonectomy procedure will not alter the choice of surgical access. Pelvic peritonectomy specimens will be analyzed as part of the final pathology report.

Group Type OTHER

systematic surgical approach to wider peritoneal biopsies according with dissection of retroperitoneal spaces, nerve-sparing approach

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Surgical Procedure:

Initial step: Exclude upper abdominal disease through inspection and guideline-based biopsies.

Pelvic peritoneal resection: En bloc or segmental removal of predefined pelvic peritoneal regions according to dissection of retroperitoneal spaces with a nerve-sparing technique.

Histopathologic Analysis

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Fixation: 10% neutral-buffered formalin for 6-48 hours. Processing: Paraffin eembedding and complete sampling for histology. Staining: H\&E and immunohistochemistry (MOC-31, BER-EP4) to identify epithelial tumor cells. Reporting: Checklist for peritoneal disease

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

systematic surgical approach to wider peritoneal biopsies according with dissection of retroperitoneal spaces, nerve-sparing approach

Surgical Procedure:

Initial step: Exclude upper abdominal disease through inspection and guideline-based biopsies.

Pelvic peritoneal resection: En bloc or segmental removal of predefined pelvic peritoneal regions according to dissection of retroperitoneal spaces with a nerve-sparing technique.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Histopathologic Analysis

Fixation: 10% neutral-buffered formalin for 6-48 hours. Processing: Paraffin eembedding and complete sampling for histology. Staining: H\&E and immunohistochemistry (MOC-31, BER-EP4) to identify epithelial tumor cells. Reporting: Checklist for peritoneal disease

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years
* FIGO 2018 stage IA-IB epithelial or non-epithelial ovarian or fallopian tube tumors
* Complete preoperative work-up (ultrasound, CT scan, tumor markers)
* Laparoscopic, robotic or open surgical approach
* Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Sarcomas, melanomas, mesotheliomas, hematologic malignancies
* Advanced ovarian tumors
* Fertility-sparing surgery with uterine preservation
* Inability to provide informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ospedale Santa Croce-Carle Cuneo

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Elena Olearo

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Andrea Puppo, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Croce e Carle Cuneo

Elena Olearo, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Croce e Carle Cuneo

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Croce e Carle Cuneo

Cuneo, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Andrea Puppo, MD

Role: CONTACT

00390171642867

Elena Olearo, MD

Role: CONTACT

00390171642369

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Silvia Violante, MD

Role: primary

00390171641539

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

van de Vorst REWM, Hoogendam JP, van der Aa MA, Witteveen PO, Zweemer RP, Gerestein CG. The attributive value of comprehensive surgical staging in clinically early-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Jun;161(3):876-883. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.04.007. Epub 2021 Apr 10.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 33849726 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CnGin20251

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.