Minimally Invasive Interval Debulking Surgery in Advanced Ovarian Cancer
NCT ID: NCT07031908
Last Updated: 2025-06-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
40 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-06-15
2029-06-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Several retrospective studies have demonstrated the feasibility of minimally invasive surgery in case of a good response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and prospective randomised trial is currently underway to demonstrate the non-inferiority of minimally invasive surgery compared to laparotomy in patients with an optimal response after 3-4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (LANCE trial, NCT04575935).
The aim of our study is to evaluate the feasibility of interval surgery after at least VI cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a minimally invasive approach.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (EOC): A Phase III Randomized Study
NCT00715286
Debulking Surgery in Ovarian Cancer
NCT03378128
Systematic Lymphadenectomy During Interval Debulking Surgery in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
NCT06385912
Surgical Complications Related to Primary or Interval Debulking in Ovarian Neoplasm
NCT01461850
Efficacy of Primary Debulking Surgery Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage IV Ovarian Cancer
NCT05371301
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy has increased significantly in recent years, and it has been shown that the determining prognostic factor is the achievement of an absent residual tumour at surgery. However, the optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles is not yet well defined. Several retrospective studies have evaluated the efficacy of interval debulking surgery after performing more than 4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In these studies, the percentage of patients undergoing \>4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy varied in a range of approximately 22% to 45%. Currently, several randomised trials are ongoing, evaluating the optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles (3 vs. 6 cycles) in terms of complete cytoreduction (GOGER, NCT02125513) and survival (CHRONO, NCT03579394).
Several retrospective studies have demonstrated the feasibility of minimally invasive surgery in case of a good response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (median neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles: 4). Therefore, a prospective randomised trial is currently underway to demonstrate the non-inferiority in terms of progression-free survival of minimally invasive surgery compared to laparotomy in patients with an optimal response after 3-4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (LANCE trial, NCT04575935).
The aim of our study is to evaluate the feasibility of interval surgery after at least VI cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a minimally invasive approach.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Minimally invasive cytoreduction
Minimally invasive cytoreduction in patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with 6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherpy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Partial or complete radiological response of abdominal cavity disease after at least 6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).
* CA125 \< 100 U/mL.
* ECOG performance status 0-1.
* Signed informed consent and ability to comply with follow-up, including in cases where the patient has a legal guardian. In such cases, consent will be provided by the legal guardian.
* Review of imaging by a radiologist and senior surgeon at a multidisciplinary tumor board, particularly evaluating hepatic hilum involvement, mesenteric root, extensive peritoneal disease in the upper abdomen, extensive hepatic or gastric involvement, and extensive intestinal involvement.
* If all the previous criteria are met and protocol acceptance is obtained, the patient will undergo a laparoscopic evaluation of all abdominal quadrants to confirm the feasibility of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Surgery will be considered feasible if complete gross resection can be achieved with minimally invasive surgery. If minimally invasive surgery is not feasible, the patient will be excluded from the study, and the reason for unfeasibility will be described.
Exclusion Criteria
* Disease free of other active malignancies within the past 5 years, except basal cell carcinoma of the skin.
* History of psychological, familial, sociological, or geographic conditions potentially impeding adherence to the study protocol and follow-up program
* Inability to tolerate prolonged Trendelenburg position or pneumoperitoneum
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Carmine Conte
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica
Roma, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
7596
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.