Minimally Invasive Interval Debulking Surgery in Advanced Ovarian Cancer

NCT ID: NCT07031908

Last Updated: 2025-06-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-06-15

Study Completion Date

2029-06-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (AOC), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) combined with interval cytoreductive surgery and post-operative chemotherapy is an option.

Several retrospective studies have demonstrated the feasibility of minimally invasive surgery in case of a good response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and prospective randomised trial is currently underway to demonstrate the non-inferiority of minimally invasive surgery compared to laparotomy in patients with an optimal response after 3-4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (LANCE trial, NCT04575935).

The aim of our study is to evaluate the feasibility of interval surgery after at least VI cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a minimally invasive approach.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (AOC), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) combined with interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) and post-operative chemotherapy is an option. Four randomised trials (EORTC55971, CHORUS, JCOG0602, SCORPION) have shown that survival rates after NACT are similar to those after primary cytoreductive surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy.

The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy has increased significantly in recent years, and it has been shown that the determining prognostic factor is the achievement of an absent residual tumour at surgery. However, the optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles is not yet well defined. Several retrospective studies have evaluated the efficacy of interval debulking surgery after performing more than 4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In these studies, the percentage of patients undergoing \>4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy varied in a range of approximately 22% to 45%. Currently, several randomised trials are ongoing, evaluating the optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles (3 vs. 6 cycles) in terms of complete cytoreduction (GOGER, NCT02125513) and survival (CHRONO, NCT03579394).

Several retrospective studies have demonstrated the feasibility of minimally invasive surgery in case of a good response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (median neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles: 4). Therefore, a prospective randomised trial is currently underway to demonstrate the non-inferiority in terms of progression-free survival of minimally invasive surgery compared to laparotomy in patients with an optimal response after 3-4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (LANCE trial, NCT04575935).

The aim of our study is to evaluate the feasibility of interval surgery after at least VI cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a minimally invasive approach.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ovarian Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Minimally invasive cytoreduction

Minimally invasive cytoreduction in patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with 6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherpy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Stage IIIC or IV high-grade invasive epithelial ovarian carcinoma (serous, endometrioid, clear cell, transitional), primary peritoneal carcinoma, or fallopian tube carcinoma, or pathology consistent with high-grade Müllerian carcinoma.
* Partial or complete radiological response of abdominal cavity disease after at least 6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).
* CA125 \< 100 U/mL.
* ECOG performance status 0-1.
* Signed informed consent and ability to comply with follow-up, including in cases where the patient has a legal guardian. In such cases, consent will be provided by the legal guardian.
* Review of imaging by a radiologist and senior surgeon at a multidisciplinary tumor board, particularly evaluating hepatic hilum involvement, mesenteric root, extensive peritoneal disease in the upper abdomen, extensive hepatic or gastric involvement, and extensive intestinal involvement.
* If all the previous criteria are met and protocol acceptance is obtained, the patient will undergo a laparoscopic evaluation of all abdominal quadrants to confirm the feasibility of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Surgery will be considered feasible if complete gross resection can be achieved with minimally invasive surgery. If minimally invasive surgery is not feasible, the patient will be excluded from the study, and the reason for unfeasibility will be described.

Exclusion Criteria

* Evidence of a tumor not amenable to minimally invasive complete resection on preoperative imaging (CT, PET-CT, or MRI). Radiologic criteria (tumor board evaluation): hepatic hilum involvement, mesentery root, extensive peritoneal disease in upper abdomen, extensive hepatic or gastric involvement, extensive intestinal involvement
* Disease free of other active malignancies within the past 5 years, except basal cell carcinoma of the skin.
* History of psychological, familial, sociological, or geographic conditions potentially impeding adherence to the study protocol and follow-up program
* Inability to tolerate prolonged Trendelenburg position or pneumoperitoneum
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Carmine Conte

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Carmine Conte

Role: CONTACT

+39 063015 5878

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Carmine Conte

Role: primary

+39 0630155878

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

7596

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

LYmphadenectomy After NeoAdjuvant Chemotherapy
NCT01724944 UNKNOWN PHASE1/PHASE2