Chemotherapy Plus Surgery in Treating Patients With Stage III or Stage IV Ovarian, Peritoneal, or Fallopian Tube Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00003636

Last Updated: 2015-08-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

704 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

1998-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining surgery with chemotherapy may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether chemotherapy before surgery is more effective than chemotherapy after surgery in treating ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying chemotherapy given before surgery to see how well it works compared to chemotherapy given after surgery with or without additional surgery in treating patients with stage III or stage IV ovarian cancer, peritoneal cancer, or fallopian tube cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES:

* Compare the overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with stage IIIC or IV ovarian epithelial, peritoneal, or fallopian tube carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery versus upfront cytoreductive surgery followed by chemotherapy with or without interval debulking surgery.
* Compare the quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
* Compare the different treatment complications in patients treated with these regimens.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to participating center, method of biopsy, stage, largest tumor size before surgery, and intent to also randomize on EORTC-55012. Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms.

* Arm I: Patients undergo upfront maximal cytoreductive surgery followed by cisplatin or carboplatin IV every 3 weeks for 3 courses. Patients with non-optimal primary debulking may undergo interval debulking surgery at the physician's discretion. All patients then receive an additional 3 courses of the same regimen of chemotherapy.
* Arm II: Patients receive chemotherapy as in arm I. Patients with stable or responding disease undergo interval debulking surgery followed by an additional 3 courses of the same regimen of chemotherapy.

Second-look surgery is allowed for both arms if clinically indicated.

Quality of life (QOL) is assessed prior to treatment, after the third and sixth course of chemotherapy, and at 6 and 12 months after study. Patients who are also randomized on EORTC-55012 follow the QOL assessment schedule for EORTC-55012 only.

Patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually thereafter.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 704 patients will be accrued for this study within 4 years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fallopian Tube Cancer Ovarian Cancer Primary Peritoneal Cavity Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

carboplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

cisplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

conventional surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

neoadjuvant therapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

* Histologically proven stage IIIC or IV ovarian epithelial carcinoma, peritoneal carcinoma, or fallopian tube carcinoma

* If biopsy is not available, evidence of adenocarcinoma by fine needle aspiration allowed if all of the following are true:

* Presence of pelvic ovarian mass
* Omental cake or other metastasis larger than 2 cm in the upper abdomen and/or regional lymph node metastasis
* CA 125/carcinoembryonic antigen ratio greater than 25 (if ratio less than 25, barium enema or colonoscopy AND gastroscopy or radiological examination of the stomach must be negative for primary tumor)
* Normal mammography (if CA 125/carcinoembryonic antigen ratio less than 25)
* Tumor greater than 2 cm, excluding ovaries, on laparoscopy or CT scan
* No brain or leptomeningeal metastases

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Age:

* Not specified

Performance status:

* WHO 0-2

Life expectancy:

* Not specified

Hematopoietic:

* WBC greater than 3,000/mm\^3
* Platelet count greater than 100,000/mm\^3

Hepatic:

* Bilirubin less than 1.25 times upper limit of normal (ULN)

Renal:

* Creatinine less than 1.25 times ULN

Other:

* No other serious disabling diseases contraindicating primary cytoreductive surgery or primary platin-based chemotherapy
* No other prior primary malignancies except carcinoma in situ of the cervix or basal cell carcinoma of the skin
* No psychological, familial, sociological, or geographical condition potentially preventing protocol compliance or follow-up

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Biologic therapy

* Not specified

Chemotherapy

* Not specified

Endocrine therapy

* Not specified

Radiotherapy

* Not specified

Surgery

* No other prior procedures except diagnostic biopsy by laparotomy or laparoscopy
Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ignace B. Vergote, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

U.Z. Gasthuisberg, Leuven

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital de Clinicas "Jose De San Martin"

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Shaare Zedek Medical Center

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Karl-Franzens-University Graz

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Innsbruck Universitaetsklinik

Innsbruck, , Austria

Site Status

Allgemeines Krankenhaus - Universitatskliniken

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Applied Cancer Research at Kaiser Franz Josef Hospital

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Academisch Ziekenhuis der Vrije Universiteit Brussel

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen

Edegem, , Belgium

Site Status

Cazk Groeninghe - Campus Maria's Voorzienigheid

Kortrijk, , Belgium

Site Status

U.Z. Gasthuisberg

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Tom Baker Cancer Centre - Calgary

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

BCCA - Fraser Valley Cancer Centre

Surrey, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

British Columbia Cancer Agency - Vancouver Cancer Centre

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

CancerCare Manitoba

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Saint John Regional Hospital

Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada

Site Status

Doctor H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Site Status

Nova Scotia Cancer Centre

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario at Kingston General Hospital

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

CHUS-Hopital Fleurimont

Fleurimont, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Hopital Charles Lemoyne

Greenfield Park, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

McGill Cancer Centre at McGill University

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Hopital Notre-Dame du CHUM

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Herlev Hospital - University Hospital of Copenhagen

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Institut Bergonie

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Centre Oscar Lambret

Lille, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Regional et Universitaire de Lille

Lille, , France

Site Status

Institut Claudius Regaud

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Martin Luther Universitaet

Halle, , Germany

Site Status

Coombe Women's Hospital

Dublin, , Ireland

Site Status

St. James's Hospital

Dublin, , Ireland

Site Status

Spedali Civili di Brescia

Brescia, , Italy

Site Status

Mirano General Hospital

Mirano-Venice, , Italy

Site Status

Libero Istituto Universitario Campus Bio-Medico

Rome, , Italy

Site Status

Azienda Sanitaria Ospedaliera Ordine Mauriziano

Torino, , Italy

Site Status

Clinica Universitaria

Turin, , Italy

Site Status

Vrije Universiteit Medisch Centrum

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Akademisch Ziekenhuis Vrije Universiteit - Medisch Centrum

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Academisch Medisch Centrum at University of Amsterdam

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Leiden University Medical Center

Leiden, , Netherlands

Site Status

Universitair Medisch Centrum St. Radboud - Nijmegen

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Daniel Den Hoed Cancer Center at Erasmus Medical Center

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Erasmus MC - Sophia Children's Hospital

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Haukeland Hospital - University of Bergen

Bergen, , Norway

Site Status

Norwegian Radium Hospital

Oslo, , Norway

Site Status

Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra (HUC)

Coimbra, , Portugal

Site Status

Instituto Portugues de Oncologia de Francisco Gentil - Centro Regional de Oncologia de Lisboa, S.A.

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Institut d'Oncologia Corachan

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario San Carlos

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias

Oviedo, , Spain

Site Status

Lund University Hospital

Lund, , Sweden

Site Status

Karolinska University Hospital - Huddinge

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Umea Universitet

UmeƄ, , Sweden

Site Status

Uppsala University Hospital

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

Royal United Hospital

Bath, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Cheltenham General Hospital

Cheltenham, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

University College of London Hospitals

London, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology NHS Trust

Merseyside, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

James Cook University Hospital

Middlesbrough, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Mount Vernon Cancer Centre at Mount Vernon Hospital

Northwood, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Nottingham City Hospital NHS Trust

Nottingham, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Staffordshire General Hospital

Stafford, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Western Infirmary

Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom

Site Status

Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother Hospital

Margate, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Argentina Austria Belgium Canada Denmark France Germany Ireland Italy Netherlands Norway Portugal Spain Sweden United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chi DS, Musa F, Dao F, Zivanovic O, Sonoda Y, Leitao MM, Levine DA, Gardner GJ, Abu-Rustum NR, Barakat RR. An analysis of patients with bulky advanced stage ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal carcinoma treated with primary debulking surgery (PDS) during an identical time period as the randomized EORTC-NCIC trial of PDS vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Jan;124(1):10-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.08.014. Epub 2011 Sep 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21917306 (View on PubMed)

Verleye L, Ottevanger PB, Kristensen GB, Ehlen T, Johnson N, van der Burg ME, Reed NS, Verheijen RH, Gaarenstroom KN, Mosgaard B, Seoane JM, van der Velden J, Lotocki R, van der Graaf W, Penninckx B, Coens C, Stuart G, Vergote I. Quality of pathology reports for advanced ovarian cancer: are we missing essential information? An audit of 479 pathology reports from the EORTC-GCG 55971/NCIC-CTG OV13 neoadjuvant trial. Eur J Cancer. 2011 Jan;47(1):57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.08.008. Epub 2010 Sep 16.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20850296 (View on PubMed)

Vergote I, Trope CG, Amant F, Kristensen GB, Ehlen T, Johnson N, Verheijen RH, van der Burg ME, Lacave AJ, Panici PB, Kenter GG, Casado A, Mendiola C, Coens C, Verleye L, Stuart GC, Pecorelli S, Reed NS; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Gynaecological Cancer Group; NCIC Clinical Trials Group. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 2;363(10):943-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908806.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20818904 (View on PubMed)

Fruehauf JP, Yu I, Parker R: In vitro drug response and biomarker profiles for ovarian cancer specimens obtained at initial debulking or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (EORTC 55971). [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 21: A-2177, 2002.

Reference Type RESULT

Tajik P, van de Vrie R, Zafarmand MH, Coens C, Buist MR, Vergote I, Bossuyt PMM, Kenter GG. The FIGO Stage IVA Versus IVB of Ovarian Cancer: Prognostic Value and Predictive Value for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018 Mar;28(3):453-458. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001186.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29324537 (View on PubMed)

Vizzielli G, Fanfani F, Chiantera V, Tortorella L, Lucidi A, Petrillo M, Costantini B, Scambia G, Fagotti A. Does the diagnosis center influence the prognosis of ovarian cancer patients submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy? Anticancer Res. 2015 May;35(5):3027-32.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25964591 (View on PubMed)

van Meurs HS, Tajik P, Hof MH, Vergote I, Kenter GG, Mol BW, Buist MR, Bossuyt PM. Which patients benefit most from primary surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer? An exploratory analysis of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 55971 randomised trial. Eur J Cancer. 2013 Oct;49(15):3191-201. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.06.013. Epub 2013 Jul 11.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23850170 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EORTC-55971

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

EORTC-55971

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.